comp.arch

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819
Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  ii       +* Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove3Michael S
14 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  ii       i`* Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove2Michael S
14 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  ii       i `- Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove1MitchAlsup1
14 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  ii       `* Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove2Stefan Monnier
14 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  ii        `- Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove1MitchAlsup1
13 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  i+* Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove (was: Why VAX ..)3Michael S
13 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  ii+- Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove1MitchAlsup1
14 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  ii`- Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove (was: Why VAX ..)1Anton Ertl
16 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  i`- Re: rep movsb vs. simpler instructions for memcpy/memmove (was: Why VAX ..)1George Neuner
13 Mar 25 ii     i     i  i  `- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Mar 25 ii     i     i  `- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Mar 25 ii     i     `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2Michael S
7 Mar 25 ii     i      `- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Terje Mathisen
3 Mar 25 ii     `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2Robert Swindells
4 Mar 25 ii      `- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Anton Ertl
1 Mar 25 i+* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC28BGB
2 Mar 25 ii+* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2MitchAlsup1
2 Mar 25 iii`- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1BGB
2 Mar 25 ii+* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC24Anton Ertl
2 Mar 25 iii+* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC14BGB
2 Mar 25 iiii+* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2Stephen Fuld
2 Mar 25 iiiii`- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Mar 25 iiii`* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC11John Levine
3 Mar 25 iiii `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC10Brian G. Lucas
4 Mar 25 iiii  +* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC4John Levine
4 Mar 25 iiii  i`* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC3Brian G. Lucas
4 Mar 25 iiii  i `* Re: PC/IX, not, Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2John Levine
4 Mar 25 iiii  i  `- Re: PC/IX, not, Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Brian G. Lucas
4 Mar 25 iiii  `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC5John Dallman
5 Mar 25 iiii   `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Mar 25 iiii    `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC3John Dallman
7 Mar 25 iiii     `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2George Neuner
8 Mar 25 iiii      `- Re: PC/IX, Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1John Levine
3 Mar 25 iii`* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC9Terje Mathisen
3 Mar 25 iii +* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC7Anton Ertl
3 Mar 25 iii i+- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Terje Mathisen
3 Mar 25 iii i`* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC5Michael S
4 Mar 25 iii i `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC4George Neuner
5 Mar 25 iii i  `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC3Michael S
5 Mar 25 iii i   `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Mar 25 iii i    `- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Michael S
4 Mar 25 iii `- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Mar 25 i+* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Anton Ertl
5 Mar 25 i`* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2Stefan Monnier
5 Mar 25 i `- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Thomas Koenig
1 Mar 25 +- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1MitchAlsup1
2 Mar 25 +* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Mar 25 i+- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1BGB
2 Mar 25 i+* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2Anton Ertl
2 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1MitchAlsup1
2 Mar 25 i`- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Michael S
2 Mar 25 +- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1MitchAlsup1
5 Mar 25 `* Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC2Theo
6 Mar 25  `- Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Mar 25 * An execution time puzzle11Anton Ertl
10 Mar 25 +* Re: An execution time puzzle7Anton Ertl
10 Mar 25 i+* Re: An execution time puzzle2Brett
10 Mar 25 ii`- Re: An execution time puzzle1Anton Ertl
10 Mar 25 i`* Re: An execution time puzzle4Anton Ertl
11 Mar 25 i `* Re: An execution time puzzle3Anton Ertl
11 Mar 25 i  `* Re: An execution time puzzle2Michael S
11 Mar 25 i   `- Re: An execution time puzzle1Anton Ertl
10 Mar 25 `* Re: An execution time puzzle3Robert Finch
10 Mar 25  +- Re: An execution time puzzle1Michael S
11 Mar 25  `- Re: An execution time puzzle1Anton Ertl
30 Jan 25 * Misc: Ongoing status...25BGB
31 Jan 25 +* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...19MitchAlsup1
31 Jan 25 i`* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...18BGB
31 Jan 25 i `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...17MitchAlsup1
1 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...16BGB
1 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...15MitchAlsup1
1 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...14BGB
2 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...13MitchAlsup1
2 Feb 25 i      +- Re: Misc: Ongoing status...1BGB
2 Feb 25 i      `* Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers (was: Misc: Ongoing status...)11Anton Ertl
2 Feb 25 i       `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers10BGB
2 Feb 25 i        `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers9BGB
3 Feb 25 i         `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers8MitchAlsup1
3 Feb 25 i          `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers7BGB
3 Feb 25 i           `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers6MitchAlsup1
3 Feb 25 i            `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers5BGB
4 Feb 25 i             `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers4MitchAlsup1
4 Feb 25 i              `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers3BGB
4 Feb 25 i               `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers2MitchAlsup1
5 Feb 25 i                `- Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers1BGB
9 Mar 25 `* Instruction Parcel Size5Robert Finch
9 Mar 25  `* Re: Instruction Parcel Size4MitchAlsup1
9 Mar 25   +- Re: Instruction Parcel Size1Robert Finch
9 Mar 25   `* Re: Instruction Parcel Size2Robert Finch
9 Mar 25    `- Re: Instruction Parcel Size1MitchAlsup1
2 Feb 25 * Re: Cost of handling misaligned access112BGB
3 Feb 25 +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2MitchAlsup1
3 Feb 25 i`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
3 Feb 25 `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access109Anton Ertl
3 Feb 25  +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access11BGB
3 Feb 25  i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access10Anton Ertl
3 Feb 25  i +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
3 Feb 25  i `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access8Thomas Koenig
4 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access7Anton Ertl
4 Feb 25  i   +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access5Thomas Koenig
4 Feb 25  i   i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access4Anton Ertl
4 Feb 25  i   i +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Thomas Koenig
10 Feb 25  i   i i`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Mike Stump
10 Feb 25  i   i `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Mike Stump
4 Feb 25  i   `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1MitchAlsup1
3 Feb 25  +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access3Thomas Koenig
3 Feb 25  i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2BGB
3 Feb 25  i `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1MitchAlsup1
4 Feb 25  +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access41Anton Ertl
5 Feb 25  i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access40Terje Mathisen
5 Feb 25  i +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access4Anton Ertl
5 Feb 25  i i+* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Terje Mathisen
6 Feb 25  i ii`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Anton Ertl
6 Feb 25  i i`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Anton Ertl
5 Feb 25  i `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access35Michael S
6 Feb 25  i  +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access32Anton Ertl
6 Feb 25  i  i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access31Michael S
6 Feb 25  i  i +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Anton Ertl
6 Feb 25  i  i i`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Michael S
6 Feb 25  i  i `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access28Terje Mathisen
6 Feb 25  i  i  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access27Terje Mathisen
6 Feb 25  i  i   `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access26Michael S
6 Feb 25  i  i    `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access25Terje Mathisen
6 Feb 25  i  i     +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access19Michael S
7 Feb 25  i  i     i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access18Terje Mathisen
7 Feb 25  i  i     i `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access17Michael S
7 Feb 25  i  i     i  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access16Terje Mathisen
7 Feb 25  i  i     i   `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access15Michael S
7 Feb 25  i  i     i    +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Terje Mathisen
7 Feb 25  i  i     i    +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access3MitchAlsup1
8 Feb 25  i  i     i    i+- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Terje Mathisen
8 Feb 25  i  i     i    i`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Michael S
8 Feb 25  i  i     i    `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access10Anton Ertl
8 Feb 25  i  i     i     +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Terje Mathisen
8 Feb 25  i  i     i     +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access6Michael S
8 Feb 25  i  i     i     i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access5Anton Ertl
8 Feb 25  i  i     i     i +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Michael S
9 Feb 25  i  i     i     i +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Michael S
11 Feb 25  i  i     i     i i`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Michael S
9 Feb 25  i  i     i     i `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Michael S
9 Feb 25  i  i     i     +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Michael S
10 Feb 25  i  i     i     `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Michael S
7 Feb 25  i  i     `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access5BGB
7 Feb 25  i  i      `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access4MitchAlsup1
7 Feb 25  i  i       `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access3BGB
8 Feb 25  i  i        `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Anssi Saari
8 Feb 25  i  i         `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
6 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Terje Mathisen
6 Feb 25  i   `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Michael S
6 Feb 25  +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access5Waldek Hebisch
6 Feb 25  i+* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access3Anton Ertl
6 Feb 25  ii`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Waldek Hebisch
6 Feb 25  ii `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Anton Ertl
6 Feb 25  i`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Terje Mathisen
13 Feb 25  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access48Marcus
13 Feb 25   +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Thomas Koenig
14 Feb 25   +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access41BGB
14 Feb 25   i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access40MitchAlsup1
18 Feb 25   i `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access39BGB
18 Feb 25   i  +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access33MitchAlsup1
18 Feb 25   i  i+- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
18 Feb 25   i  i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access31Michael S
18 Feb 25   i  i +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Thomas Koenig
18 Feb 25   i  i +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access26MitchAlsup1
18 Feb 25   i  i i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access25Terje Mathisen
18 Feb 25   i  i i `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access24MitchAlsup1
19 Feb 25   i  i i  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access23Terje Mathisen
19 Feb 25   i  i i   `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access22MitchAlsup1
19 Feb 25   i  i i    `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access21BGB
20 Feb 25   i  i i     +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Robert Finch
20 Feb 25   i  i i     +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access5MitchAlsup1
20 Feb 25   i  i i     i+* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2BGB
20 Feb 25   i  i i     ii`- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
21 Feb 25   i  i i     i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Robert Finch
21 Feb 25   i  i i     i `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
21 Feb 25   i  i i     `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access14BGB
22 Feb 25   i  i i      +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Robert Finch
22 Feb 25   i  i i      `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access12Robert Finch
23 Feb 25   i  i i       +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access10BGB
23 Feb 25   i  i i       i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access9Michael S
24 Feb 25   i  i i       i +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
24 Feb 25   i  i i       i `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access7Michael S
24 Feb 25   i  i i       i  +* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access4Robert Finch
24 Feb 25   i  i i       i  i+- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
24 Feb 25   i  i i       i  i`* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2MitchAlsup1
25 Feb 25   i  i i       i  i `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
25 Feb 25   i  i i       i  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2MitchAlsup1
25 Feb 25   i  i i       i   `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
23 Feb 25   i  i i       `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Robert Finch
18 Feb 25   i  i `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access3BGB
19 Feb 25   i  i  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2MitchAlsup1
19 Feb 25   i  i   `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
18 Feb 25   i  `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access5Robert Finch
18 Feb 25   i   `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access4BGB
18 Feb 25   i    `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access3Brett
18 Feb 25   i     `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Marcus
18 Feb 25   i      `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1BGB
17 Feb 25   `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access5Terje Mathisen
17 Feb 25    +- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1Thomas Koenig
17 Feb 25    `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access3MitchAlsup1
17 Feb 25     `* Re: Cost of handling misaligned access2Terje Mathisen
17 Feb 25      `- Re: Cost of handling misaligned access1MitchAlsup1
1 Oct 24 * Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)387MitchAlsup1
1 Oct 24 `* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)386Thomas Koenig
1 Oct 24  +* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)379MitchAlsup1
2 Oct 24  i+* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)377Brett
3 Oct 24  ii`* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)376Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24  ii +- Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)1Brett
3 Oct 24  ii +- Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)1Anton Ertl
3 Oct 24  ii `* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)373David Brown
3 Oct 24  ii  `* Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)372Anton Ertl
3 Oct 24  ii   +- Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)1David Brown
3 Oct 24  ii   +* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)369Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24  ii   i+- Re: Byte ordering1Lynn Wheeler
4 Oct 24  ii   i+* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)365David Brown
4 Oct 24  ii   ii`* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)364Anton Ertl
4 Oct 24  ii   ii +* Re: Byte ordering5BGB
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i`* Re: Byte ordering4MitchAlsup1
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i +* Re: Byte ordering2BGB
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i i`- Re: Byte ordering1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i `- Re: Byte ordering1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24  ii   ii +* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i`* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)12Brett
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)11Anton Ertl
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i  `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)10Michael S
6 Oct 24  ii   ii i   +- Re: Byte ordering1Terje Mathisen
6 Oct 24  ii   ii i   `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)8Brett
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i    `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i     `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)6Brett
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i      `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)5Michael S
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i       +* Re: Byte ordering2Stefan Monnier
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i       i`- Re: Byte ordering1Michael S
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i       `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Oct 24  ii   ii i        `- Re: Byte ordering1Terje Mathisen
6 Oct 24  ii   ii `* Re: Byte ordering345David Brown
6 Oct 24  ii   ii  `* Re: Byte ordering344Anton Ertl
6 Oct 24  ii   ii   +* Re: Byte ordering189John Dallman
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i+* Re: Byte ordering20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii`* Re: Byte ordering19John Dallman
9 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii +- VMS/NT memory management (was: Byte ordering)1Stefan Monnier
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii +* Re: Byte ordering2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii i`- Re: Byte ordering1MitchAlsup1
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii `* Re: Byte ordering15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  +* Re: Byte ordering3Michael S
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  i+- Re: Byte ordering1John Dallman
18 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  i`- Re: Byte ordering1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  +* Re: Byte ordering9John Dallman
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  i+* Re: Byte ordering7George Neuner

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal