comp.theory
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
56
olcott
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
55
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
54
olcott
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
53
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
2
olcott
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
50
olcott
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
49
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
48
olcott
19 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
47
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
46
olcott
19 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
45
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
44
olcott
19 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
43
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
42
olcott
19 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
15
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
14
olcott
20 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
12
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
11
olcott
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
10
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
9
olcott
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
8
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
7
olcott
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
6
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
5
olcott
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
4
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
3
olcott
21 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
1
immibis
22 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
1
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
1
immibis
20 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
26
olcott
22 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
25
olcott
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
24
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
23
olcott
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
21
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
6
olcott
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
5
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
4
olcott
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
3
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
2
olcott
24 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
1
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
14
olcott
27 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
13
olcott
27 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
12
olcott
28 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
11
olcott
29 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
10
Richard Damon
29 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
9
olcott
29 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
5
Richard Damon
29 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
4
olcott
29 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
3
Richard Damon
29 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
2
olcott
30 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
1
Richard Damon
29 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
3
Python
29 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
2
olcott
30 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method MTT
1
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method (agreement)
1
olcott
17 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
2
olcott
17 May 24
Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
1
Richard Damon
28 May 24
Another Halting Problem Question (very difficult)
6
wij
29 May 24
Re: Another Halting Problem Question (very difficult)
5
wij
29 May 24
Re: Another Halting Problem Question (very difficult)
4
wij
29 May 24
Re: Another Halting Problem Question (very difficult)
3
wij
29 May 24
Re: Another Halting Problem Question (very difficult)
2
Mike Terry
29 May 24
Re: Another Halting Problem Question (very difficult)
1
wij
26 May 24
Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems --- Key feedback from Mike Terry
4
olcott
26 May 24
Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems --- Key feedback from Mike Terry
2
Richard Damon
26 May 24
Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems --- Key feedback from Mike Terry
1
olcott
26 May 24
Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems --- Key feedback from Mike Terry
1
Richard Damon
26 May 24
Is there quick sort that the worst case complexity is O(NlogN)?
2
wij
26 May 24
Re: Is there quick sort that the worst case complexity is O(NlogN)?
1
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Addressing the only rebuttal of my proof in the last two years (correction)
2
olcott
25 May 24
Re: Addressing the only rebuttal of my proof in the last two years (correction)
1
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Addressing the only rebuttal of my proof in the last two years
2
olcott
25 May 24
Re: Addressing the only rebuttal of my proof in the last two years
1
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
10
olcott
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
9
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
8
olcott
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
7
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
6
olcott
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
5
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
4
olcott
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
3
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
2
olcott
25 May 24
Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
1
Richard Damon
25 May 24
Is this a NP problem?
1
wij
22 May 24
No decider is ever allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
13
olcott
23 May 24
Re: No decider is ever allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
12
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
11
olcott
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
10
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
9
olcott
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
8
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
7
olcott
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
3
Fred. Zwarts
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
2
olcott
24 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within
1
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within (LIE)
3
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within (LIE)
2
olcott
24 May 24
Re: No decider is allowed to report on the behavior of the computation that itself is contained within (LIE)
1
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Message_ID Provided V2
33
olcott
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Message_ID Provided V2
32
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Message_ID Provided V2
25
olcott
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Message_ID Provided V2
24
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
20
olcott
20 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
19
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
18
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
17
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
16
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
15
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
14
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
13
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
12
olcott
22 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
11
Richard Damon
22 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
10
olcott
22 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
3
Richard Damon
22 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
2
olcott
22 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
1
Richard Damon
22 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
1
Fred. Zwarts
22 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt
5
joes
22 May 24
Every D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation
4
olcott
23 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation
3
Richard Damon
23 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation
2
olcott
23 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation
1
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Message_ID Provided V2
3
immibis
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Message_ID Provided V2
2
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Message_ID Provided V2
1
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
6
olcott
20 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
5
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
4
olcott
20 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
3
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
2
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H cannot possible reach its own line 06 and halt
1
Richard Damon
17 May 24
Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
37
olcott
17 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
3
Richard Damon
17 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
2
olcott
17 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Richard Damon
17 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
32
Fred. Zwarts
17 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
21
Mikko
17 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
20
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
18
Mikko
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
17
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
15
Mikko
19 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
14
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
13
Mikko
19 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
12
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
3
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts --- Admitted Liar
2
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts --- Olcott is an Admitted Liar
1
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
8
Mikko
20 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
7
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
5
Mikko
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
2
immibis
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Mikko
21 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
2
olcott
22 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Richard Damon
17 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
10
olcott
17 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
8
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
2
Mikko
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
joes
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
3
Mikko
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
2
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts
1
immibis
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
31
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
30
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
2
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
27
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
26
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
25
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
24
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
23
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
15
immibis
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
9
olcott
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
8
immibis
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
7
olcott
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
3
immibis
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
2
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
3
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
2
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
5
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
3
immibis
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
2
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
7
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
6
olcott
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
5
Richard Damon
20 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
4
olcott
21 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
Richard Damon
21 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
2
immibis
21 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
olcott
14 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
19
Mikko
14 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
18
olcott
15 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
17
Mikko
15 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
16
olcott
16 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS WRONG !!!
1
Richard Damon
16 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
14
Mikko
16 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
13
olcott
17 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
9
Mikko
17 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
8
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS WRONG !!!
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
6
Mikko
18 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
5
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
1
Richard Damon
19 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
3
Mikko
19 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
2
olcott
19 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS A LIAR !!!
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
3
immibis
18 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
2
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
ℙ≠ℕℙ proof
5
wij
18 May 24
Re: ℙ≠ℕℙ proof
4
immibis
18 May 24
Re: ℙ≠ℕℙ proof
3
wij
19 May 24
Re: ℙ≠ℕℙ proof
2
immibis
19 May 24
Re: ℙ≠ℕℙ proof
1
wij
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
7
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
3
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
2
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
3
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
2
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message-ID provided
4
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message-ID provided
3
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message-ID provided
2
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message-ID provided
1
Richard Damon
14 May 24
Re: Is Richard a Liar?
175
Mikko
14 May 24
Re: Is Richard a Liar?
18
olcott
15 May 24
Re: Olcott is a Liar!
1
Richard Damon
15 May 24
Re: Is Richard a Liar?
16
Mikko
15 May 24
Re: Is Richard a Liar?
15
olcott
16 May 24
Re: Olcott is a Liar!
1
Richard Damon
16 May 24
Re: Is Richard a Liar?
13
Mikko
16 May 24
Re: Is Richard a Liar?
12
olcott
17 May 24
Re: Olcott is a patholgociat liar!
1
Richard Damon
17 May 24
Re: Is Richard a Liar?
10
Mikko
17 May 24
Re: Is Richard a Liar?
9
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Olcott is a Liar!
5
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Re: Olcott is a Liar!
4
Mikko
18 May 24
Re: Olcott is a Liar!
1
Richard Damon
18 May 24
Richard is proven to be incorrect on a key point
2
olcott
18 May 24
Re: Richard is proven to be incorrect on a key point
1
Richard Damon
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal