Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)
Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)
Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) The essence of my halting problem work Re: The essence of my halting problem work Re: The essence of my halting problem work Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- CORRECTION Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- CORRECTION Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---Olcott is a liar! Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct
Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar? Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: This philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: Verified facts regarding the software engineering of DDD, HHH, and HHH1 --- TYPO Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH