comp.theory
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
4 Sep 24
The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
22
olcott
13 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
21
Mikko
13 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
20
olcott
13 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
14 Sep
10:26
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
18
Mikko
14 Sep
16:01
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
17
olcott
15 Sep
10:32
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
16
Mikko
15 Sep
19:09
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
14
olcott
15 Sep
19:16
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
16 Sep
09:54
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
12
Mikko
16 Sep
13:57
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
11
olcott
17 Sep
00:58
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
17 Sep
08:41
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
9
Mikko
17 Sep
15:01
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
8
olcott
17 Sep
16:45
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
7
Mikko
17 Sep
17:20
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
6
olcott
18 Sep
00:37
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
18 Sep
10:22
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
4
Mikko
18 Sep
14:49
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
3
olcott
19 Sep
00:47
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
19 Sep
10:22
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Mikko
16 Sep
10:01
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Fred. Zwarts
15 Sep
16:23
Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
18
olcott
15 Sep
18:55
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
3
Richard Damon
15 Sep
21:07
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
2
olcott
16 Sep
03:10
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
1
Richard Damon
16 Sep
10:06
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
3
Mikko
16 Sep
14:03
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
2
olcott
17 Sep
08:51
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
1
Mikko
16 Sep
10:09
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
1
Fred. Zwarts
16 Sep
13:21
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
10
Fred. Zwarts
16 Sep
14:09
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- damned liar
9
olcott
16 Sep
15:36
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- damned liar
7
Fred. Zwarts
16 Sep
17:58
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
6
olcott
17 Sep
00:52
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
5
Richard Damon
17 Sep
01:15
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
4
olcott
17 Sep
04:42
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
3
Richard Damon
17 Sep
05:13
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
2
olcott
17 Sep
12:59
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
1
Richard Damon
17 Sep
00:52
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- damned liar
1
Richard Damon
17 Sep
02:26
The Foundation of Linguistic truth is NOT stipulated relations between finite strings
4
Jeff Barnett
17 Sep
04:01
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is NOT stipulated relations between finite strings
3
olcott
17 Sep
04:36
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is NOT stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
17 Sep
08:48
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is NOT stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Mikko
2 Sep 24
Defining a correct simulating halt decider
193
olcott
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
39
Fred. Zwarts
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
27
olcott
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
21
joes
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
19
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
13
joes
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
12
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
10
Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
Fred. Zwarts
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
11
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
6
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
joes
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
148
Mikko
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
147
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
145
Mikko
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
144
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
56
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
55
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
52
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
51
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
48
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
47
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
41
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
8
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
joes
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
31
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
29
joes
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
28
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
17
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
16
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
15
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
14
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
13
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
12
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
11
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
10
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
10
Fred. Zwarts
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
olcott
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
Fred. Zwarts
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
6
olcott
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
85
Mikko
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
84
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
67
joes
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
66
Mikko
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
65
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
joes
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
59
Mikko
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
58
olcott
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
6
joes
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
5
olcott
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
35
Mikko
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
34
olcott
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
GOD
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
30
Mikko
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
29
olcott
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
20
Fred. Zwarts
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
19
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
18
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Doug Lenat
2
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Doug Lenat
1
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
15
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
14
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
12
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
11
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
10
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
9
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
8
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
7
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
6
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
5
Richard Damon
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
4
olcott
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
3
Richard Damon
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
2
olcott
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler
1
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
Mikko
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
6
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
15
Fred. Zwarts
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
olcott
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
8
Fred. Zwarts
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Mikko
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
13 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
Mike Terry
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Ridiculously stupid
2
olcott
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Ridiculously stupid
1
Richard Damon
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Mike Terry
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Mike Terry
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
14
Mikko
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
13
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
joes
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
6
olcott
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Mikko
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Mikko
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
R. Swipe
1 Sep 24
I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
59
olcott
1 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
1
Python
1 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
57
Mikko
2 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
56
olcott
2 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
1
Richard Damon
2 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
1
Richard Damon
3 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
53
Mikko
3 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
52
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
2
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
1
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
49
Mikko
5 Sep 24
I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases with mt new notion of {linguistic truth}
48
olcott
6 Sep 24
Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases with mt new notion of {linguistic truth}
9
Richard Damon
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal