comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun18:43 * Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method52Alan Mackenzie
26 Jun18:57 `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method51olcott
27 Jun14:57  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method30olcott
29 Jun10:18  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method29Mikko
29 Jun15:09  i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method27olcott
29 Jun20:26  i i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method13olcott
30 Jun03:46  i ii+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method11Richard Damon
30 Jun04:05  i iii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method10olcott
30 Jun12:28  i iii `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method9Richard Damon
30 Jun18:00  i iii  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method8olcott
1 Jul02:10  i iii   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method7Richard Damon
1 Jul02:26  i iii    +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method5olcott
1 Jul12:28  i iii    i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method4Richard Damon
1 Jul13:07  i iii    i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method3olcott
2 Jul02:25  i iii    i  +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
2 Jul21:40  i iii    i  `- Logic proves that Peter Olcott is just a liar.1Richard Damon
2 Jul11:12  i iii    `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Heathfield
30 Jun09:47  i ii`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Mikko
30 Jun03:39  i i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method12Richard Damon
1 Jul02:12  i ii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method11Richard Damon
1 Jul02:34  i ii +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method8olcott
1 Jul09:28  i ii i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method4Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul12:52  i ii ii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method3olcott
2 Jul02:28  i ii ii +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
2 Jul09:37  i ii ii `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul12:32  i ii i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method3Richard Damon
1 Jul12:55  i ii i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method2olcott
2 Jul02:31  i ii i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
3 Jul03:50  i ii `* HHH(DDD)==0 is correct2olcott
3 Jul09:57  i ii  `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Mikko
30 Jun09:39  i i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Mikko
30 Jun09:28  i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Mikko
27 Jun15:06  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method20Richard Damon
27 Jun15:44   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method19olcott
27 Jun16:59    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method18Richard Damon
27 Jun17:16     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method12olcott
27 Jun18:54     i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method11Richard Damon
27 Jun20:11     i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method10olcott
27 Jun20:24     i  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method9Richard Damon
27 Jun20:43     i   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method8olcott
27 Jun20:55     i    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method7Richard Damon
27 Jun21:10     i     `* ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude all agree the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-terminating behavior6olcott
27 Jun22:42     i      +- Re: ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude all agree the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-terminating behavior1Richard Damon
28 Jun02:12     i      `* Re: ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude all agree the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-terminating behavior4Richard Damon
28 Jun02:20     i       `* Re: ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude all agree the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-terminating behavior3olcott
28 Jun04:07     i        `* Re: ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude all agree the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-terminating behavior2Richard Damon
28 Jun14:04     i         `- Re: ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude all agree the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-terminating behavior1Richard Damon
27 Jun17:34     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method5olcott
27 Jun18:27      +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method3Alan Mackenzie
27 Jun19:11      i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method2olcott
27 Jun20:24      i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
27 Jun18:50      `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25 * HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT117olcott
16 Jun 25 +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT41Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT40olcott
16 Jun 25 i +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25 i i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
16 Jun 25 i +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT13Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i i+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10olcott
17 Jun 25 i ii`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT9Richard Damon
17 Jun 25 i ii +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3olcott
17 Jun 25 i ii i+- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25 i ii i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
17 Jun 25 i ii `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5olcott
17 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25 i ii  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
18 Jun 25 i ii  i `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT !!!2olcott
17 Jun 25 i i `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT !!!1Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25 i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT24Mikko
16 Jun 25 i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT23olcott
17 Jun 25 i   +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT18Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25 i   i+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT16olcott
18 Jun 25 i   ii+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT14Richard Damon
18 Jun 25 i   iii`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT13olcott
19 Jun 25 i   iii +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
19 Jun 25 i   iii `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT11Mikko
19 Jun 25 i   iii  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10olcott
20 Jun 25 i   iii   +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
20 Jun 25 i   iii   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT8Mikko
20 Jun 25 i   iii    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT7olcott
21 Jun 25 i   iii     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT6Mikko
21 Jun 25 i   iii      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5olcott
21 Jun 25 i   iii       +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 i   iii       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
22 Jun 25 i   iii        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
23 Jun 25 i   iii         `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
18 Jun 25 i   ii`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25 i   i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25 i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4Mikko
17 Jun 25 i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3olcott
18 Jun 25 i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2Mikko
18 Jun 25 i      `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
16 Jun 25 +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2Mikko
16 Jun 25 i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
16 Jun 25 `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT73Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25  +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
17 Jun 25  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25  i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
18 Jun 25  i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT68olcott
17 Jun 25   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT67Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT66olcott
18 Jun 25     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT65Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT64olcott
19 Jun 25       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT63Fred. Zwarts
19 Jun 25        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT62olcott
20 Jun 25         `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT61Fred. Zwarts
20 Jun 25          `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT60olcott
20 Jun 25           +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT11joes
20 Jun 25           i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10olcott
21 Jun 25           i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT9Richard Damon
21 Jun 25           i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT8olcott
21 Jun 25           i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT7Richard Damon
21 Jun 25           i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT6olcott
22 Jun 25           i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT5Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
22 Jun 25           i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT3Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           i        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
23 Jun 25           i         `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT48Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 25            `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT47olcott
23 Jun 25             `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT46Fred. Zwarts
23 Jun 25              +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT40olcott
24 Jun 25              i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT39Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 25              i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT38olcott
25 Jun 25              i  +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT18Mikko
25 Jun 25              i  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT17olcott
26 Jun11:20              i  i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT16Mikko
27 Jun05:21              i  i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT15olcott
27 Jun15:26              i  i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT14olcott
28 Jun09:47              i  i    +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT7Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun10:01              i  i    i+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
29 Jun15:28              i  i    ii`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun10:32              i  i    ii `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
29 Jun11:43              i  i    i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun14:49              i  i    i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun08:43              i  i    i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun12:56              i  i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT6Mikko
28 Jun14:51              i  i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5olcott
29 Jun10:10              i  i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4Mikko
29 Jun15:34              i  i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3olcott
30 Jun08:42              i  i        +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun10:40              i  i        `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
25 Jun 25              i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT19Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 25              i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT18olcott
26 Jun10:16              i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT17Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun00:30              i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT16olcott
28 Jun09:50              i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT15Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun14:02              i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT14olcott
29 Jun10:14              i        +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
29 Jun15:37              i        i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun10:46              i        i `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
29 Jun11:38              i        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun14:37              i         +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
29 Jun14:46              i         `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT8olcott
30 Jun08:40              i          `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT7Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun18:08              i           +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
1 Jul10:17              i           i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul13:44              i           i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
2 Jul09:43              i           i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun18:22              i           `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
1 Jul10:11              i            `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 25              `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5Mikko
24 Jun 25               `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
25 Jun 25                `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
25 Jun 25                 `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
26 Jun11:23                  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
23 Jun 25 * ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis90olcott
23 Jun 25 `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis89Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis21olcott
23 Jun 25  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis20Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis19olcott
23 Jun 25  i  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis17joes
23 Jun 25  i  i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
24 Jun 25  i  ii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis7Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  i  ii `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis6olcott
24 Jun 25  i  ii  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  i  ii   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
25 Jun 25  i  ii    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Richard Damon
25 Jun 25  i  ii     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25  i  ii      `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  i  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
23 Jun 25  i  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis7joes
23 Jun 25  i  i  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis6olcott
24 Jun 25  i  i   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5joes
24 Jun 25  i  i    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
25 Jun 25  i  i     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Mikko
25 Jun 25  i  i      `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25  i  i       `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
24 Jun 25  i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis67olcott
24 Jun 25   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis66Richard Damon
24 Jun 25    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis65olcott
24 Jun 25     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Chris M. Thomasson
24 Jun 25     i+- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
25 Jun 25     i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
25 Jun 25     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis9Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
25 Jun 25     i +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
26 Jun 25     i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
26 Jun 25     i i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun12:30     i i i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun12:28     i i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis51Mikko
25 Jun 25      `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis50olcott
26 Jun 25       +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis18Fred. Zwarts
27 Jun05:26       i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis17olcott
27 Jun08:59       i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis16Fred. Zwarts
27 Jun15:08       i  `* ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---15olcott
28 Jun09:57       i   `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---14Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun14:08       i    `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---13olcott
28 Jun18:39       i     +- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Richard Damon
29 Jun11:34       i     `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---11Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun14:29       i      `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---10olcott
29 Jun20:05       i       +- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Richard Damon
30 Jun08:38       i       `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---8Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun17:33       i        `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---7olcott
30 Jun21:40       i         `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---6joes
30 Jun22:50       i          `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---5olcott
1 Jul09:56       i           +* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---3joes
1 Jul12:38       i           i`* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---2olcott
1 Jul15:42       i           i `- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1joes
1 Jul10:06       i           `- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Fred. Zwarts
26 Jun11:16       `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis31Mikko
27 Jun03:58        `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis30olcott
27 Jun07:55         `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis29Mikko
27 Jun15:19          `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis28olcott
28 Jun13:04           `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis27Mikko
28 Jun14:54            `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis26olcott
28 Jun18:41             +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis20Richard Damon
28 Jun22:52             i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis19olcott
29 Jun00:10             i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis16Richard Damon
29 Jun00:19             i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis15olcott
29 Jun02:14             i i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4Richard Damon
29 Jun04:36             i i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3olcott
29 Jun12:09             i i i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2Richard Damon
29 Jun14:23             i i i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
29 Jun15:47             i i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis10olcott
30 Jun08:35             i i  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun17:20             i i  i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
1 Jul09:40             i i  ii`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun17:42             i i  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Mike Terry
30 Jun23:00             i i  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
1 Jul09:36             i i  i  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul13:09             i i  i   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal