sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Jul05:27 * Re: Positrons7Bertietaylor
7 Jul19:40 `* Re: Positrons6Paul.B.Andersen
7 Jul19:53  +- Re: Positrons1Athel Cornish-Bowden
7 Jul22:20  +- Re: Positrons1Maciej Woźniak
7 Jul23:02  `* Re: Positrons3Stefan Ram
8 Jul13:57   `* Re: Positrons2Paul.B.Andersen
8 Jul15:17    `- Re: Positrons1Stefan Ram
6 Jul06:34 * Dr. Cluster...12Chris M. Thomasson
6 Jul06:47 +- Re: Dr. Cluster...1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Jul10:36 `* Re: Dr. Cluster...10Nolan Kouropoulos
6 Jul23:10  `* Re: Dr. Cluster...9Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul12:59   `* Re: Dr. Cluster...8Jimmy Munaev
7 Jul20:21    +* Re: Dr. Cluster...6Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul21:19    i`* Re: Dr. Cluster...5Patricio Bekhoev
7 Jul21:40    i `* Re: Dr. Cluster...4Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul21:51    i  `* Re: Dr. Cluster...3Stanton Takeshita
8 Jul01:41    i   `* Re: Dr. Cluster...2Chris M. Thomasson
8 Jul11:47    i    `- Re: Dr. Cluster...1Orlirio Mukusev
7 Jul20:21    `- Re: Dr. Cluster...1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Jul09:19 o "Physical time" is a delusion1Maciej Woźniak
4 Jul20:46 * Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics7Aether Regained
4 Jul22:41 `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics6Bertitaylor
4 Jul23:19  +- Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics1Jim Pennino
5 Jul20:32  `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics4Aether Regained
5 Jul20:44   `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics3Aether Regained
6 Jul01:02    `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics2Antony Paraskos
8 Jul08:32     `- Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics1Thomas Heger
27 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings21Lucus Shalabanov
28 Jun 25 `* Re: The Apollo moon landings20Bertitaylor
28 Jun 25  `* Re: The Apollo moon landings19Oleg Tzeboev
2 Jul01:03   `* Re: The Apollo moon landings18Bertitaylor
2 Jul19:01    `* Re: The Apollo moon landings17Tyller Maksimchikov
2 Jul23:06     `* Re: The Apollo moon landings16Bertitaylor
3 Jul20:09      `* Re: The Apollo moon landings15Luther Makhmutov
3 Jul22:28       `* Re: The Apollo moon landings14Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jul00:11        `* Re: The Apollo moon landings13Bertitaylor
4 Jul19:55         +* Re: The Apollo moon landings2Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jul22:32         i`- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor
4 Jul22:31         `* Re: The Apollo moon landings10Anderw Bakadorov
4 Jul23:02          `* Re: The Apollo moon landings9Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jul23:05           +- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jul11:53           `* Re: The Apollo moon landings7Vince Babakulov
5 Jul12:50            `* Re: The Apollo moon landings6Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul13:13             `* Re: The Apollo moon landings5Cesario Lokhanov
7 Jul20:22              +- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul20:39              `* Re: The Apollo moon landings3Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul21:33               `* Re: The Apollo moon landings2Pat Ruzaev
7 Jul21:42                `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jul23:38 * ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?5George Hammond
6 Jul00:19 +* Re: ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?3Sean Beizerov
6 Jul03:59 i`* Re: ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?2George Hammond
6 Jul08:35 i `- Re: ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?1Fransisco Méndez
6 Jul23:22 `- Re: ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Jun 25 * Bertietaylor 's formula34Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25 +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula6Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25 i+* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula4Jim Pennino
2 Jul01:45 ii`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
2 Jul02:39 ii `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Python
2 Jul03:21 ii  `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25 i`- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25 +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula9Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25 i+- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25 i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula7Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25 i +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25 i i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25 i i `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25 i `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25 i  `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul10:05 i   `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25 `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula18Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25  `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula17Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25   `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula15Paul.B.Andersen
30 Jun 25    +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula8guido wugi
1 Jul20:28    i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula7Paul.B.Andersen
1 Jul21:48    i +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1guido wugi
1 Jul22:35    i `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula5Chris M. Thomasson
2 Jul03:24    i  +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
2 Jul03:36    i  i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul04:45    i  i `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
5 Jul19:34    i  `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Deangelo Kalabukhov
1 Jul 25    +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
1 Jul21:35    +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
2 Jul00:55    +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
2 Jul00:47    `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
2 Jul01:42     `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul03:11      `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
5 Jul16:27 o Re: The Apollo moon landings1Fonzie Mocharov
7 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings11Jim Pennino
8 Jun 25 +- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Jonny Veselov
8 Jun 25 `* Re: The Apollo moon landings9Jim Pennino
8 Jun 25  +* Re: The Apollo moon landings7Powell Speech-language pathologists Ban
9 Jun 25  i`* Re: The Apollo moon landings6rhertz
9 Jun 25  i +* Re: The Apollo moon landings2Thomas Heger
10 Jun 25  i i`- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor
14 Jun 25  i `* Re: The Apollo moon landings3LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25  i  `* Re: The Apollo moon landings2Thomas Heger
5 Jul11:25  i   `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertietaylor
10 Jun 25  `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Jim Pennino
25 Jun 25 * Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)40Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25 `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)39bertitaylor
26 Jun 25  +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)37Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jun 25   +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Lon Mahankov
27 Jun 25   +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)34Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   i+* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)16Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)14Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)13Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   ii  +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)7Chris M. Thomasson
28 Jun 25   ii  i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)6Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25   ii  i `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)5Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun 25   ii  i  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)4Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25   ii  i   `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun 25   ii  i    `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
4 Jul23:19   ii  i     `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii  +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   ii  i`- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   ii  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Jim Pennino
28 Jun 25   ii   `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
28 Jun 25   ii    `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)16Paul.B.Andersen
27 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Dekota Hamaev
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Martino Krakowski
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Kerwin Baklanov
1 Jul 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25   i +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25   i i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25   i i `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
2 Jul18:20   i +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Jul18:46   i i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Maciej Woźniak
3 Jul09:43   i i`- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Paul.B.Andersen
2 Jul19:34   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jul23:00   i `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Truman Agamov
3 Jul15:06   `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Bertitaylor
4 Jul22:54 o Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from 2nd law1Orazio Vakulovsky
4 Jul14:08 o Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics1Jim Pennino
9 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings6Jim Pennino
10 Jun 25 +* Re: The Apollo moon landings4Jim Pennino
10 Jun 25 i`* Re: The Apollo moon landings3Jim Pennino
10 Jun 25 i +- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Yanko Habov
4 Jul04:09 i `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor
11 Jun 25 `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Shay Bagaev
28 Jun 25 * Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy10Maciej Woźniak
28 Jun 25 +* Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy2Python
29 Jun 25 i`- Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy1Maciej Woźniak
30 Jun 25 `* Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy7Maciej Woźniak
1 Jul22:19  `* Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy6Maciej Woźniak
2 Jul03:13   +- Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy1Python
2 Jul22:08   `* Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy4Python
3 Jul08:43    `* Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy3Python
3 Jul20:54     `* Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy2Python
3 Jul23:53      `- Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy1Python
21 Jun 25 * Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?18anthk
21 Jun 25 +* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?16Stefan Ram
22 Jun 25 i`* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?15Jan Panteltje
24 Jun 25 i `* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?14Jan Panteltje
25 Jun 25 i  `* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?13Jan Panteltje
26 Jun 25 i   `* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?12Jan Panteltje
27 Jun 25 i    `* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?11Jan Panteltje
28 Jun 25 i     `* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?10Jan Panteltje
2 Jul07:41 i      +- Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?1Jan Panteltje
2 Jul20:03 i      `* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?8squalk
2 Jul21:21 i       +* Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?3squalk
2 Jul23:30 i       i+- Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jul19:06 i       i`- Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?1Thomas Heger
3 Jul09:24 i       +- Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?1Jan Panteltje
3 Jul09:37 i       +- Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?1Jan Panteltje
3 Jul19:01 i       +- Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?1Thomas Heger
3 Jul19:04 i       `- Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?1Thomas Heger
21 Jun 25 `- Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?1Chris M. Thomasson
15 Jun 25 * The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven16LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven9J. J. Lodder
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven4LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25 i`- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Mikko
27 Jun 25 i`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jul10:44 i `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Mikko
19 Jun 25 `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Richard Hachel
20 Jun 25  `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2Mikko
20 Jun 25   `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Jonatan Babanov
2 Jul03:33 * The cause of gravity and unification of forces11Bertitaylor
2 Jul04:51 +- Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces1Jim Pennino
2 Jul07:32 +* Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces8Bertitaylor
2 Jul14:41 i`* Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces7Jim Pennino
2 Jul22:55 i `* Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces6Bertitaylor
2 Jul23:09 i  +* Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces2Python
3 Jul01:25 i  i`- Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces1Bertitaylor
2 Jul23:11 i  `* Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces3Jim Pennino
3 Jul01:22 i   `* Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces2Bertitaylor
3 Jul02:36 i    `- Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces1Jim Pennino
2 Jul17:08 `- Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces1David Canzi
23 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings6Jim Pennino
24 Jun 25 `* Re: The Apollo moon landings5bertietaylor
24 Jun 25  `* Re: The Apollo moon landings4Jim Pennino
25 Jun 25   `* Re: The Apollo moon landings3Bertitaylor
25 Jun 25    `* Re: The Apollo moon landings2Jim Pennino
2 Jul23:07     `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor
19 Jun 25 * The first postulate is a truism.55LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Jun 25 +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.53Mikko
20 Jun 25 i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.33LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.32Mikko
21 Jun 25 ii +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25 ii i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.5Python
22 Jun 25 ii ii+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Bertitaylor
22 Jun 25 ii ii+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Maciej Woźniak
23 Jun 25 ii ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25 ii ii `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Python
22 Jun 25 ii i`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.3Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii i `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii i  `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
22 Jun 25 ii +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Jerald Warszawski
22 Jun 25 ii +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Walid Paradjanov
23 Jun 25 ii +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25 ii i+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii i`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii i `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.16LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii  +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
27 Jun 25 ii  `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.14Thomas Heger
27 Jun 25 ii   `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.13Mikko
28 Jun 25 ii    `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.12Thomas Heger
28 Jun 25 ii     +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.10Athel Cornish-Bowden
29 Jun 25 ii     i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.8Thomas Heger
29 Jun 25 ii     ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.7Athel Cornish-Bowden
30 Jun 25 ii     ii `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.6Thomas Heger
30 Jun 25 ii     ii  `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.5Athel Cornish-Bowden
30 Jun 25 ii     ii   +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2Julio Di Egidio
30 Jun 25 ii     ii   i`- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Python
1 Jul 25 ii     ii   +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Thomas Heger
1 Jul 25 ii     ii   `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25 ii     i`- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25 ii     `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
20 Jun 25 i+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25 i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.5Mikko
21 Jun 25 ii +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 25 ii i`- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal