comp.ai.philosophy

Liste des Groupes 1
Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Aug 24 * The Gates of the Boolean Logic10greggdurishan
7 Aug 24 +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1olcott
7 Aug 24 +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1olcott
7 Aug 24 +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1olcott
7 Aug 24 +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1olcott
11 Aug 24 `* Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic5greggdurishan
11 Aug 24  +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1greggdurishan
11 Aug 24  `* Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic3greggdurishan
13 Aug 24   `* Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic2greggdurishan
17 Sep08:42    `- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1greggdurishan
7 Sep 24 * Correcting the AI hallucination of LLM systems2olcott
7 Sep 24 `- Re: Correcting the AI hallucination of LLM systems1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 o test server V31olcott
3 Aug 24 * test3olcott
3 Aug 24 `* Re: test2olcott
4 Aug 24  `- Re: test1olcott
29 Jul 24 * Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...7olcott
29 Jul 24 +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...5Fred. Zwarts
29 Jul 24 i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...4olcott
29 Jul 24 i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...3Fred. Zwarts
29 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...2olcott
30 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jul 24 `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... DDD will HALT if HHH answers1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 * Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now.2olcott
23 Jul 24 `- Re: Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now.1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 * Hypothetical possibilities V23olcott
22 Jul 24 +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities V21Fred. Zwarts
23 Jul 24 `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities V21Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 * Hypothetical possibilities17olcott
20 Jul 24 +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
20 Jul 24 i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities13Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities12olcott
20 Jul 24   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities8Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24   i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6olcott
20 Jul 24   ii+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities4Richard Damon
20 Jul 24   iii`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3olcott
20 Jul 24   iii +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24   iii `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24   ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24   i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Alan Mackenzie
20 Jul 24   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
20 Jul 24    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
20 Jul 24     `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 * Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily True? --- AKA a Tautology2olcott
13 Jul 24 `- Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily True? --- AKA a Tautology1Richard Damon
12 Jul 24 * DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V229olcott
12 Jul 24 +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V21Fred. Zwarts
13 Jul 24 `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INcorrectly rejected as non-halting V227Richard Damon
13 Jul 24  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V226olcott
13 Jul 24   +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V23Richard Damon
13 Jul 24   i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V22olcott
13 Jul 24   i `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V21Richard Damon
13 Jul 24   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V222Fred. Zwarts
13 Jul 24    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V221olcott
13 Jul 24     +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V217Fred. Zwarts
13 Jul 24     i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V216olcott
13 Jul 24     i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V215Richard Damon
13 Jul 24     i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V214olcott
13 Jul 24     i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V213Richard Damon
13 Jul 24     i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V212olcott
13 Jul 24     i     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V211Richard Damon
13 Jul 24     i      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V210olcott
13 Jul 24     i       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V29Richard Damon
13 Jul 24     i        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V28olcott
13 Jul 24     i         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V27Richard Damon
13 Jul 24     i          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V26olcott
13 Jul 24     i           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V25Richard Damon
13 Jul 24     i            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V24olcott
13 Jul 24     i             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V23Richard Damon
13 Jul 24     i              `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V22olcott
13 Jul 24     i               `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V21Richard Damon
13 Jul 24     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V23Richard Damon
13 Jul 24      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V22olcott
13 Jul 24       `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V21Richard Damon
7 Jul 24 * Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters4olcott
7 Jul 24 `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters3Richard Damon
9 Jul 24  `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters2olcott
10 Jul 24   `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24 o Why examine the halting problem using the x86 language?1olcott
29 Jun 24 * People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language24olcott
29 Jun 24 +* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language21Richard Damon
29 Jun 24 i`* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language20olcott
29 Jun 24 i `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language19Richard Damon
29 Jun 24 i  `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language18olcott
29 Jun 24 i   `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language17Richard Damon
29 Jun 24 i    `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language16olcott
29 Jun 24 i     `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language15Richard Damon
29 Jun 24 i      `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language14olcott
29 Jun 24 i       `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language13Richard Damon
29 Jun 24 i        `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language12olcott
29 Jun 24 i         `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language11Richard Damon
29 Jun 24 i          `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language10olcott
29 Jun 24 i           `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language9Richard Damon
30 Jun 24 i            `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language8olcott
30 Jun 24 i             `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language7Richard Damon
30 Jun 24 i              `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language6olcott
30 Jun 24 i               `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language5Richard Damon
30 Jun 24 i                `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language4olcott
30 Jun 24 i                 `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language3Richard Damon
30 Jun 24 i                  `* Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language2olcott
30 Jun 24 i                   `- Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language1Richard Damon
1 Jul 24 +- Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language1Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 24 `- Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language1olcott
15 Jun 24 * H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES12olcott
15 Jun 24 `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES11Richard Damon
15 Jun 24  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES10olcott
16 Jun 24   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES9Richard Damon
16 Jun 24    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES8olcott
16 Jun 24     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES7Richard Damon
16 Jun 24      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES6olcott
16 Jun 24       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES5Richard Damon
16 Jun 24        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES4olcott
16 Jun 24         `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES3Richard Damon
16 Jun 24          `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES2olcott
16 Jun 24           `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES1Richard Damon
22 May 24 * test posting2olcott
22 May 24 `- Re: test posting1olcott
16 May 24 * Re: Is Richard a Liar? (test formatting)2olcott
18 May 24 `- test of time stamp1olcott
17 May 24 * Reply to Ben's long standing objection --- I finally have the words2olcott
18 May 24 `- Re: Reply to Ben's long standing objection --- I finally have the words1Richard Damon
4 May 24 o test to see if posting works1olcott
17 Mar 24 * Re: Analytical truth redefined so that Quine can understand that bachelors are unmarried2HenHanna
17 Mar 24 `- Re: Analytical truth redefined so that Quine can understand that bachelors are unmarried1olcott
17 Mar 24 o Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions: reject them --discourse context --1Ross Finlayson
14 Mar 24 * Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions: reject them4olcott
14 Mar 24 +* Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions: reject them2olcott
15 Mar 24 i`- Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions: reject them1olcott
15 Mar 24 `- Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions: reject them --HOL--1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal