comp.ai.philosophy

Liste des Groupes Pages :12
Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jun15:32 * The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence17olcott
7 Jun15:51 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence10dbush
7 Jun15:54 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence9olcott
7 Jun15:56 i +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence7dbush
7 Jun15:58 i i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence6olcott
7 Jun16:01 i i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence5dbush
7 Jun16:06 i i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4olcott
7 Jun16:08 i i   +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2dbush
7 Jun16:12 i i   i`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1olcott
8 Jun00:07 i i   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun23:59 i `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun23:56 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4Richard Damon
8 Jun12:08 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3Richard Damon
8 Jun18:24 i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2Richard Damon
9 Jun03:36 i  `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
8 Jun18:22 +- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun22:06 `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1anthk
9 Jun03:50 * Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point64olcott
9 Jun04:08 +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point60dbush
9 Jun04:16 i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point59olcott
9 Jun04:32 i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point56dbush
9 Jun04:39 i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point55olcott
9 Jun16:29 i i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point52olcott
9 Jun16:34 i i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point51dbush
9 Jun16:49 i i i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point50olcott
9 Jun16:54 i i i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point49dbush
9 Jun17:06 i i i   +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point47olcott
9 Jun17:12 i i i   i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point46dbush
9 Jun17:24 i i i   i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point44olcott
9 Jun17:33 i i i   i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point43dbush
9 Jun17:39 i i i   i i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point42olcott
9 Jun17:43 i i i   i i  +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1dbush
9 Jun17:52 i i i   i i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point40dbush
9 Jun18:03 i i i   i i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point39olcott
9 Jun18:07 i i i   i i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point38dbush
9 Jun18:12 i i i   i i     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point37olcott
9 Jun18:20 i i i   i i      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point36dbush
9 Jun18:34 i i i   i i       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point35olcott
9 Jun18:39 i i i   i i        `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point34dbush
9 Jun18:43 i i i   i i         `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point33olcott
9 Jun18:48 i i i   i i          `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point32dbush
9 Jun19:02 i i i   i i           `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point31olcott
9 Jun19:14 i i i   i i            `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point30dbush
9 Jun19:35 i i i   i i             `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point29olcott
9 Jun19:46 i i i   i i              `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point28dbush
9 Jun20:20 i i i   i i               `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point27olcott
9 Jun20:42 i i i   i i                +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point14dbush
9 Jun20:48 i i i   i i                i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point13olcott
9 Jun20:49 i i i   i i                i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point12dbush
9 Jun20:55 i i i   i i                i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11olcott
9 Jun20:59 i i i   i i                i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point10dbush
9 Jun21:10 i i i   i i                i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point9olcott
9 Jun21:15 i i i   i i                i     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point8dbush
9 Jun21:18 i i i   i i                i      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point7olcott
9 Jun21:20 i i i   i i                i       +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4dbush
9 Jun21:34 i i i   i i                i       i+- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun00:24 i i i   i i                i       i+- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun06:50 i i i   i i                i       i`- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun21:33 i i i   i i                i       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2dbush
9 Jun21:51 i i i   i i                i        `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun20:47 i i i   i i                `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point12dbush
9 Jun20:52 i i i   i i                 `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11olcott
9 Jun20:54 i i i   i i                  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point10dbush
9 Jun20:56 i i i   i i                   +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4olcott
9 Jun21:05 i i i   i i                   i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3dbush
9 Jun21:14 i i i   i i                   i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
9 Jun21:18 i i i   i i                   i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1dbush
9 Jun21:39 i i i   i i                   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point5Richard Heathfield
10 Jun00:10 i i i   i i                    +- It has always been impossible to define an INPUT that does the opposite of its halt decider1olcott
10 Jun01:31 i i i   i i                    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3olcott
10 Jun12:33 i i i   i i                     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2Richard Damon
10 Jun18:42 i i i   i i                      `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun17:26 i i i   i `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun20:17 i i i   `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun17:17 i i `* Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)2olcott
10 Jun18:59 i i  `- Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)1Richard Damon
9 Jun12:25 i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2Richard Damon
9 Jun15:52 i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun04:31 +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Keith Thompson
9 Jun12:24 `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2Richard Damon
9 Jun15:46  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
4 Jun 25 * Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH124olcott
4 Jun 25 `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH123dbush
4 Jun 25  `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH122olcott
4 Jun 25   `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH121dbush
4 Jun 25    `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH120olcott
4 Jun 25     `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH119dbush
4 Jun 25      `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH118olcott
5 Jun01:57       +- Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH11olcott
6 Jun17:53       `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE16olcott
7 Jun03:02        `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE15Richard Damon
7 Jun04:43         `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE14olcott
7 Jun12:18          `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE13Richard Damon
7 Jun15:13           `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE12olcott
8 Jun00:38            `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE11Richard Damon
8 Jun00:54             `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE10olcott
8 Jun12:11              `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE9Richard Damon
8 Jun17:41               `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE8olcott
8 Jun18:17                +* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE4Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun20:47                i`* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE3olcott
9 Jun03:38                i +- Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE1Richard Damon
9 Jun11:33                i `- Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE1Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun18:27                `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE3Richard Damon
8 Jun20:48                 `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE2olcott
9 Jun03:42                  `- Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE1Richard Damon
29 May 25 o Disagreeing with tautologies is always incorrect1olcott
20 May 25 o AI figured out how to replicate?1Richmond
17 May 25 o Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer1olcott
15 May 25 o Overcoming the proof of undecidability of the Halting Problem by a simple example in C1olcott
26 Apr 25 * Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs3olcott
2 May 25 `* Functions computed by Turing Machines MUST apply finite string transformations to inputs2olcott
4 May 25  `- Re: Functions computed by Turing Machines MUST apply finite string transformations to inputs +++1olcott
21 Apr 25 * A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.11Richmond
21 Apr 25 `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.10Doc O'Leary ,
21 Apr 25  `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.9Richmond
23 Apr 25   `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.8Doc O'Leary ,
23 Apr 25    `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.7Richmond
25 Apr 25     `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.6Doc O'Leary ,
25 Apr 25      `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.5Richmond
28 Apr 25       `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.4Doc O'Leary ,
28 Apr 25        `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.3Richmond
30 Apr 25         `* Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.2Doc O'Leary ,
1 May 25          `- Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.1Richmond
20 Apr 25 * All of computation and human reasoning can be encoded as finite string transformations8olcott
20 Apr 25 `* All of computation and human reasoning can be encoded as finite string transformations --- Quine7olcott
20 Apr 25  +* Re: All of computation and human reasoning can be encoded as finite string transformations --- Quine2olcott
21 Apr 25  i`- Re: All of computation and human reasoning can be encoded as finite string transformations --- Quine1olcott
22 Apr 25  `* Re: All of computation and human reasoning can be encoded as finite string transformations --- Quine4olcott
26 Apr 25   +- Re: All computation & human reasoning encoded as finite string transformations --- Quine1olcott
26 Apr 25   `* Re: All computation & human reasoning encoded as finite string transformations --- Quine2olcott
27 Apr 25    `- Re: All computation & human reasoning encoded as finite string transformations --- Quine1olcott
20 Apr 25 * Re: Annotated Breakdown: "computing the mapping from an input"2olcott
21 Apr 25 `- Re: Annotated Breakdown: "computing the mapping from an input"1Richard Damon
13 Apr 25 o A new symbol? Exporting to my LLM (just in case it matters)1Anragde
16 Feb 25 o DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN1olcott
16 Feb 25 o DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF1olcott
8 Feb 25 o Re: Mathematical incompleteness has always been a misconception --- Tarski1olcott
8 Dec 24 o test1olcott
17 Nov 24 * HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar45olcott
17 Nov 24 +* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar9Richard Damon
17 Nov 24 i`* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar8olcott
17 Nov 24 i `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar7Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar6olcott
18 Nov 24 i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar5Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar4olcott
18 Nov 24 i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar3Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar2olcott
18 Nov 24 i       `- Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar1Richard Damon
17 Nov 24 +* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar23Richard Damon
17 Nov 24 i`* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar22olcott
17 Nov 24 i `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar21Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar20olcott
18 Nov 24 i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar19Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar18olcott
18 Nov 24 i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar17Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar16olcott
18 Nov 24 i       +- Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar1Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar14Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i        `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar13olcott
18 Nov 24 i         `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar12Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i          `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar11olcott
18 Nov 24 i           `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar10Richard Damon
18 Nov 24 i            `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar9olcott
18 Nov 24 i             +* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar3Richard Damon
19 Nov 24 i             i`* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar2olcott
19 Nov 24 i             i `- Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar1Richard Damon
19 Nov 24 i             `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar5joes
19 Nov 24 i              `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar4olcott
20 Nov 24 i               `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar3Richard Damon
20 Nov 24 i                `* Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar2olcott
20 Nov 24 i                 `- Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar1Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)12olcott
7 Dec 24  `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)11Richard Damon
7 Dec 24   `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)10olcott
7 Dec 24    `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)9Richard Damon
7 Dec 24     `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)8olcott
7 Dec 24      +* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)3Richard Damon
7 Dec 24      i`* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)2olcott
7 Dec 24      i `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
8 Dec 24      `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)4olcott
8 Dec 24       +- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1olcott
8 Dec 24       `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)2olcott
8 Dec 24        `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1olcott
28 Nov 24 * Probably not much time left7olcott
28 Nov 24 `* It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months6olcott
28 Nov 24  +* Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months4olcott
28 Nov 24  i`* Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months3olcott
28 Nov 24  i `* Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months2Richard Damon
28 Nov 24  i  `- Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months1olcott
28 Nov 24  `- Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months1olcott
16 Nov 24 * Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY4olcott
16 Nov 24 `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY3Richard Damon
16 Nov 24  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY2olcott
16 Nov 24   `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY1Richard Damon
29 Oct 24 * Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---13olcott
29 Oct 24 +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---11Andy Walker
29 Oct 24 i+* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---2olcott
30 Oct 24 ii`- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1Richard Damon
30 Oct 24 i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---8Jeff Barnett
30 Oct 24 i +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---4olcott
30 Oct 24 i i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---3Richard Damon
30 Oct 24 i i `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---2olcott
31 Oct 24 i i  `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1Richard Damon
30 Oct 24 i `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---3Andy Walker
30 Oct 24 i  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---2olcott
31 Oct 24 i   `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1Richard Damon
30 Oct 24 `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1Richard Damon
12 Oct 24 * ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct4olcott
27 Oct 24 `* Re: ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct3polcott333
27 Oct 24  `* Re: ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct2polcott333
27 Oct 24   `- Re: ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct1polcott333
22 Sep 24 * have you purchased any pro account?4kami
26 Sep 24 `* Re: have you purchased any pro account?3Anna
29 Sep 24  `* Re: have you purchased any pro account?2vallor
12 Oct 24   `- Re: have you purchased any pro account?1kazu
7 Aug 24 * The Gates of the Boolean Logic10greggdurishan
7 Aug 24 +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1olcott
7 Aug 24 +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1olcott
7 Aug 24 +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1olcott
7 Aug 24 +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1olcott
11 Aug 24 `* Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic5greggdurishan
11 Aug 24  +- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1greggdurishan
11 Aug 24  `* Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic3greggdurishan
13 Aug 24   `* Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic2greggdurishan
17 Sep 24    `- Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic1greggdurishan
7 Sep 24 * Correcting the AI hallucination of LLM systems2olcott
7 Sep 24 `- Re: Correcting the AI hallucination of LLM systems1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 o test server V31olcott
2 Aug 24 * test3olcott
2 Aug 24 `* Re: test2olcott
4 Aug 24  `- Re: test1olcott
29 Jul 24 * Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...7olcott
29 Jul 24 +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...5Fred. Zwarts
29 Jul 24 i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...4olcott
29 Jul 24 i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...3Fred. Zwarts
29 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...2olcott
30 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jul 24 `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... DDD will HALT if HHH answers1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 * Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now.2olcott
23 Jul 24 `- Re: Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now.1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 * Hypothetical possibilities V23olcott
22 Jul 24 +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities V21Fred. Zwarts
23 Jul 24 `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities V21Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 * Hypothetical possibilities17olcott
20 Jul 24 +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
20 Jul 24 i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities13Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities12olcott
20 Jul 24   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities8Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal