comp.lang.forth

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678
Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"37Alexis
27 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Richard
27 May 25 i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1minforth
28 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"33dxf
28 May 25 i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"32Richard
28 May 25 i +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
29 May 25 i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"30dxf
29 May 25 i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"29Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"23Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   ii+- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1albert
31 May 25 i   ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Paul Rubin
31 May 25 i   ii `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Anton Ertl
3 Jun12:31 i   i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"18anthk
3 Jun12:39 i   i +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"8Paul Rubin
6 Jun13:00 i   i i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"7anthk
7 Jun01:02 i   i i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6Paul Rubin
8 Jun20:41 i   i i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4anthk
8 Jun21:41 i   i i  i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3LIT
8 Jun23:26 i   i i  i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Anton Ertl
8 Jun23:58 i   i i  i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1LIT
8 Jun20:41 i   i i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
3 Jun13:07 i   i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"9LIT
6 Jun13:00 i   i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5anthk
6 Jun14:21 i   i  i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4LIT
6 Jun15:54 i   i  i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3John Ames
7 Jun13:47 i   i  i  +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
7 Jun13:47 i   i  i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
6 Jun15:37 i   i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3sjack
6 Jun15:55 i   i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
6 Jun19:13 i   i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1LIT
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2yeti
29 May 25 i   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
29 May 25 i   `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2sjack
30 May 25 i    `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
4 Jun17:48 `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Kerr-Mudd, John
8 Jun17:35 o Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".1Anton Ertl
8 Jun15:41 * Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".3LIT
8 Jun17:07 `* Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".2dxf
8 Jun17:23  `- Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".1LIT
31 May 25 * THROW codes and ambiguous conditions37dxf
31 May 25 +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions7Anton Ertl
31 May 25 i+* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
3 Jun21:48 ii`- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1sjack
31 May 25 i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions4Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3albert
1 Jun 25 i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 i   `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1albert
1 Jun 25 `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions29Hans Bezemer
2 Jun05:58  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
2 Jun11:44  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions27albert
3 Jun04:23   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions26dxf
3 Jun07:10    +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions22Anton Ertl
4 Jun15:44    i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions21dxf
4 Jun20:25    i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions20sean
5 Jun07:09    i  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
5 Jun11:17    i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions18albert
6 Jun01:47    i   +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
6 Jun07:15    i   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions16sean
6 Jun12:00    i    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions15albert
6 Jun22:06    i     `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions14sean
7 Jun04:10    i      `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions13dxf
7 Jun05:26    i       `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions12sean
7 Jun05:42    i        +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
7 Jun10:43    i        +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions9Anton Ertl
7 Jun15:06    i        i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions8dxf
7 Jun20:58    i        i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions7Paul Rubin
8 Jun02:49    i        i  +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3Paul Rubin
8 Jun04:36    i        i  i+- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
8 Jun09:07    i        i  i`- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Anton Ertl
8 Jun03:16    i        i  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
8 Jun08:56    i        i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2Anton Ertl
8 Jun15:45    i        i   `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
7 Jun15:41    i        `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1LIT
3 Jun09:43    +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1John
4 Jun03:03    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
6 Jun11:47     `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Hans Bezemer
6 Oct 24 * Parsing timestamps?45dxf
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?8mhx
6 Oct 24 i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?3dxf
6 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Parsing timestamps?2dxf
7 Oct 24 ii `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
7 Jun13:38 i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?4B. Pym
7 Jun15:36 i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?3dxf
7 Jun18:07 i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?2LIT
8 Jun03:38 i   `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?5Ruvim
6 Oct 24 i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?4dxf
6 Oct 24 i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?3Ruvim
6 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Ruvim
6 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Ruvim
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?6FFmike
6 Oct 24 i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?5FFmike
7 Oct 24 i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?4dxf
7 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?3FFmike
7 Oct 24 i   `* Re: Parsing timestamps?2dxf
7 Oct 24 i    `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1FFmike
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2Anthony Howe
7 Oct 24 i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
7 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?9albert
7 Oct 24 i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?8dxf
7 Oct 24 i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?7sjack
8 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?6dxf
8 Oct 24 i   +* Re: Parsing timestamps?3Ahmed
8 Oct 24 i   i+- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
8 Oct 24 i   i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1sjack
8 Oct 24 i   `* Re: Parsing timestamps?2sjack
9 Oct 24 i    `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
8 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?3albert
8 Oct 24 i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?2dxf
8 Oct 24 i `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Ahmed
9 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?4alaa
10 Oct 24 i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?2dxf
10 Oct 24 ii`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1alaa
16 Oct 24 i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Hans Bezemer
18 Oct 24 `* Re: Parsing timestamps?7Gerry Jackson
19 Oct 24  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?6dxf
28 Oct 24   `* Re: Parsing timestamps?5Hans Bezemer
29 Oct 24    `* Re: Parsing timestamps?4dxf
29 Oct 24     `* Re: Parsing timestamps?3Hans Bezemer
30 Oct 24      `* Re: Parsing timestamps?2dxf
31 Oct 24       `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
6 Jun11:53 * Quick file handling2dxf
6 Jun12:39 `- Re: Quick file handling1dxf
1 Jun 25 o Re: Lispification of Forth1Waldek Hebisch
27 May 25 * Re: Lispification of Forth6minforth
28 May 25 `* Re: Lispification of Forth5mhx
28 May 25  +* Re: Lispification of Forth3minforth
28 May 25  i+- Re: Lispification of Forth1Anton Ertl
29 May 25  i`- Re: Lispification of Forth1albert
29 May 25  `- Re: Lispification of Forth1albert
27 May 25 o Re: Lispification of Forth1mhx
24 May 25 * The joy of OO6albert
24 May 25 +- Re: The joy of OO1LIT
26 May 25 +* Re: The joy of OO2Paul Rubin
26 May 25 i`- Re: The joy of OO1albert
26 May 25 `* Re: The joy of OO2sjack
27 May 25  `- Re: The joy of OO1albert
27 Mar 25 * "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"198Alexis
27 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"5Martin Nicholas
28 Mar 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"4Alexis
28 Mar 25 i `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3Martin Nicholas
30 Mar 25 i  +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Alexis
30 Mar 25 i  `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Bernd Linsel
28 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"7anthk
29 Mar 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"6mhx
29 Mar 25 i +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
30 Mar 25 i +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3anthk
5 Apr 25 i i+- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1anthk
6 Apr 25 i i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1sjack
31 Mar 25 i `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1John Ames
30 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"86sjack
1 Apr 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"85dxf
29 Apr 25 i `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth84Hans Bezemer
30 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth80dxf
30 Apr 25 i  i+* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth77Hans Bezemer
1 May 25 i  ii`* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth76dxf
1 May 25 i  ii +* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth3John Doe
1 May 25 i  ii i+- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1Stephen Pelc
1 May 25 i  ii i`- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1Anton Ertl
1 May 25 i  ii `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth72Hans Bezemer
2 May 25 i  ii  +- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
3 May 25 i  ii  `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth70dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   +* QUIT and ABORT (was: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth)68Anton Ertl
3 May 25 i  ii   i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   i+* Re: QUIT and ABORT65dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   ii`* Re: QUIT and ABORT64Anton Ertl
4 May 25 i  ii   ii +* Re: QUIT and ABORT62dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   ii i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT61Anton Ertl
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i +* Re: QUIT and ABORT54dxf
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT53Ruvim
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i i +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i +* Re: QUIT and ABORT3dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT48dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  +* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT44Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT43dxf
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i i    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT42Ruvim
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     +* Re: QUIT and ABORT40dxf
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT39Ruvim
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT38dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT37Ruvim
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT36dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    +* Re: QUIT and ABORT2albert
10 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT33Ruvim
10 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i     +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
13 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i     `* Re: QUIT and ABORT31Ruvim
14 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i      `* Re: QUIT and ABORT30dxf
14 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i       `* Re: QUIT and ABORT29Ruvim
15 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i        `* Re: QUIT and ABORT28dxf
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i         `* Re: QUIT and ABORT27Ruvim
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i          `* Re: QUIT and ABORT26dxf
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i           `* Re: QUIT and ABORT25Ruvim
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i            `* Re: QUIT and ABORT24dxf
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i             `* Re: QUIT and ABORT23Ruvim
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i              `* Re: QUIT and ABORT22dxf
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i               `* Re: QUIT and ABORT21Ruvim
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                `* Re: QUIT and ABORT20dxf
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 +* Re: QUIT and ABORT2Anton Ertl
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 `* Re: QUIT and ABORT17Ruvim
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT16dxf
19 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT15Ruvim
20 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT14dxf
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                     `* Re: QUIT and ABORT13Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      +* Re: QUIT and ABORT7mhx
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i+* Re: QUIT and ABORT5Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii`* Re: QUIT and ABORT4mhx
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1albert
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1albert
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      `* Re: QUIT and ABORT4dxf
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                       `* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Ruvim
25 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                        `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2dxf
26 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                         `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT5mhx
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i  +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT3albert
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2minforth
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i    `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   ii `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT (was: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth)1albert
5 May 25 i  ii   `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
30 Apr 25 i  i`* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2sjack
1 May 25 i  i `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
30 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth3albert
30 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2Hans Bezemer
30 Apr 25 i    `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1mhx
4 Apr 25 +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
5 Apr 25 `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"98dxf
5 Apr 25  +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2Paul Rubin
6 Apr 25  i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
5 Apr 25  `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"95mhx
6 Apr 25   +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2dxf
7 Apr 25   i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Anton Ertl
6 Apr 25   `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"92dxf
6 Apr 25    +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"5mhx
6 Apr 25    i+* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2mhx
6 Apr 25    ii`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1albert
6 Apr 25    i+- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal