comp.mail.sendmail

Liste des Groupes 1
Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 May17:35 * Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?8John Levine
20 May19:48 `* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?7Claus Aßmann
20 May21:18  `* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?6John Levine
21 May06:33   `* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?5Claus Aßmann
22 May08:07    +* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?2Claus Aßmann
22 May21:09    i`- Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?1John Levine
22 May21:08    `* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?2John Levine
23 May08:44     `- Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?1Claus Aßmann
12 May 25 * Question: should submit.mc include nocanonify by default?4Stacey Marshall
13 May 25 `* Re: Question: should submit.mc include nocanonify by default?3Marco Moock
14 May 25  +- Re: Question: should submit.mc include nocanonify by default?1Stacey Marshall
14 May 25  `- Re: Question: should submit.mc include nocanonify by default?1Andrzej Adam Filip
4 May 25 * ldaprouting esmtp:[192.168.100.100]:25252none
4 May 25 `- Re: ldaprouting esmtp:[192.168.100.100]:25251none
21 Apr 25 o sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.101Claus Aßmann
10 Feb 25 * GCC 15 and sendmail and milter?5AMM
11 Feb 25 +* Re: GCC 15 and sendmail and milter?3Claus Aßmann
11 Feb 25 i`* Re: GCC 15 and sendmail and milter?2AMM
11 Feb 25 i `- Re: GCC 15 and sendmail and milter?1Claus Aßmann
5 Apr 25 `- Re: GCC 15 and sendmail and milter?1Claus Aßmann
2 Apr 25 * Allow local senders only for specific accounts?2Thorsten Glaser
3 Apr 25 `- Re: Allow only local senders for specific accounts?1Claus Aßmann
12 Mar 25 * What exactly is a token in a ruleset?2Marco Moock
28 Mar 25 `- Re: What exactly is a token in a ruleset?1Martin Neitzel
27 Mar 25 * manually bounce a queued message6Marco Moock
28 Mar 25 +* Re: manually bounce a queued message4Claus Aßmann
28 Mar 25 i`* Re: manually bounce a queued message3Otto J. Makela
28 Mar 25 i `* Re: manually bounce a queued message2Marco Moock
28 Mar 25 i  `- Re: manually bounce a queued message1Otto J. Makela
28 Mar 25 `- Re: manually bounce a queued message1Andreas S. Kerber
12 Mar 25 * Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?10Otto J. Makela
12 Mar 25 +* Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?3Claus Aßmann
19 Mar 25 i`* Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?2Otto J. Makela
19 Mar 25 i `- Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?1Otto J. Makela
14 Mar 25 +* Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?4Grant Taylor
19 Mar 25 i`* Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?3Otto J. Makela
19 Mar 25 i `* Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?2Marco Moock
19 Mar 25 i  `- Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?1Otto J. Makela
14 Mar 25 `* Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?2Marco Moock
15 Mar 25  `- Re: Sendmail and DKIM for bounce messages?1Grant Taylor
5 Mar 25 * long uptimes and mountd port2Mike Scott
5 Mar 25 `- (retract - wrong group) Re: long uptimes and mountd port1Mike Scott
12 Feb 25 * mailinglist container2none
12 Feb 25 `- Re: mailinglist container1Marco Moock
8 Feb 25 * sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.93Claus Aßmann
9 Feb 25 `* Re: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.92HQuest
11 Feb 25  `- Re: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.91Claus Aßmann
10 Feb 25 * MTA to MTA and DANE SUPPORT3jaapw
10 Feb 25 `* Re: MTA to MTA and DANE SUPPORT2Claus Aßmann
10 Feb 25  `- Re: MTA to MTA and DANE SUPPORT1jaapw
1 Feb 25 * reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver10Marco Moock
1 Feb 25 +* Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver8Grant Taylor
1 Feb 25 i`* Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver7Marco Moock
2 Feb 25 i `* Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver6Grant Taylor
2 Feb 25 i  `* Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver5Marco Moock
2 Feb 25 i   `* Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver4Grant Taylor
2 Feb 25 i    `* Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver3Marco Moock
2 Feb 25 i     `* Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver2Grant Taylor
3 Feb 25 i      `- Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver1Marco Moock
3 Feb 25 `- Re: reject=553 5.3.0 127.0.0.2 due to unreachable DNS resolver1Claus Aßmann
2 Feb 25 * how/where to limit these tries5none
2 Feb 25 +* Re: how/where to limit these tries2Marco Moock
3 Feb 25 i`- Re: how/where to limit these tries1none
3 Feb 25 `* Re: how/where to limit these tries2Claus Aßmann
3 Feb 25  `- Re: how/where to limit these tries1none
22 Jan 25 * auth relay limitting4none
22 Jan 25 `* Re: auth relay limitting3Claus Aßmann
24 Jan 25  +- Re: auth relay limitting1none
27 Jan 25  `- Re: auth relay limitting1none
13 Nov 24 * adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail)14Wolfgang Agnes
13 Nov 24 `* Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail)13Grant Taylor
13 Nov 24  +* Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail)11John D Groenveld
13 Nov 24  i`* Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail)10Bjørn Mork
13 Nov 24  i `* Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail)9Claus Aßmann
13 Nov 24  i  `* Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail)8Bjørn Mork
9 Jan 25  i   `* Trusted CA config (was: Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail))7Bjørn Mork
10 Jan 25  i    `* Re: Trusted CA config (was: Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail))6Claus Aßmann
11 Jan 25  i     `* Re: Trusted CA config5Grant Taylor
11 Jan 25  i      +* Re: Trusted CA config2Andreas S. Kerber
11 Jan 25  i      i`- Re: Trusted CA config1Grant Taylor
12 Jan 25  i      `* Re: Trusted CA config2Bjørn Mork
22 Jan 25  i       `- Re: FFRs1Claus Aßmann
19 Nov 24  `- Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail)1Wolfgang Agnes
9 Jan 25 * DAEMON_OPTIONS with Modifiers=A but still authentication attempts on port 255Jobst Schmalenbach
9 Jan 25 `* Re: DAEMON_OPTIONS with Modifiers=A but still authentication attempts on port 254Claus Aßmann
9 Jan 25  +* Re: DAEMON_OPTIONS with Modifiers=A but still authentication attempts on port 252Marco Moock
13 Jan 25  i`- Re: DAEMON_OPTIONS with Modifiers=A but still authentication attempts on port 251Jobst Schmalenbach
13 Jan 25  `- Re: DAEMON_OPTIONS with Modifiers=A but still authentication attempts on port 251Jobst Schmalenbach
28 Dec 24 * OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?11AMM
28 Dec 24 +* Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?9Claus Aßmann
6 Jan 25 i`* Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?8AMM
6 Jan 25 i `* Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?7Claus Aßmann
7 Jan 25 i  +* Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?3Grant Taylor
7 Jan 25 i  i`* Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?2Claus Aßmann
7 Jan 25 i  i `- Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?1Grant Taylor
8 Jan 25 i  `* Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?3AMM
8 Jan 25 i   +- Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?1Bjørn Mork
8 Jan 25 i   `- Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?1Claus Aßmann
28 Dec 24 `- Re: OpenSSL 3.4.x supported?1HQuest
4 Jan 25 * Filtering HELO / EHLO names before MAIL FROM7Grant Taylor
4 Jan 25 +* Re: Filtering HELO / EHLO names before MAIL FROM4Claus Aßmann
4 Jan 25 i`* Re: Filtering HELO / EHLO names before MAIL FROM3Grant Taylor
4 Jan 25 i `* Re: Filtering HELO / EHLO names before MAIL FROM2Claus Aßmann
5 Jan 25 i  `- Re: Filtering HELO / EHLO names before MAIL FROM1Grant Taylor
8 Jan 25 `* Re: Filtering HELO / EHLO names before MAIL FROM2Anthony Howe
8 Jan 25  `- Re: Filtering HELO / EHLO names before MAIL FROM1Grant Taylor
27 Dec 24 * STS causes mail to be deferred8Marco Moock
27 Dec 24 `* Re: STS causes mail to be deferred7Claus Aßmann
27 Dec 24  `* Re: STS causes mail to be deferred6Marco Moock
27 Dec 24   `* Re: STS causes mail to be deferred5Claus Aßmann
27 Dec 24    `* Re: STS causes mail to be deferred4Marco Moock
28 Dec 24     `* Re: STS causes mail to be deferred3Claus Aßmann
28 Dec 24      +- Re: STS causes mail to be deferred1Marco Moock
28 Dec 24      `- Re: STS causes mail to be deferred1Bjørn Mork
29 Oct 24 * Problem with FEATURE(`sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects14Bjørn Mork
29 Oct 24 +* Re: Problem with FEATURE(`sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects10Bjørn Mork
29 Oct 24 i+* Re: Problem with FEATURE('sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects8HQuest
29 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Problem with FEATURE('sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects7Bjørn Mork
29 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Problem with FEATURE('sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects6Claus Aßmann
29 Oct 24 ii  `* Re: Problem with FEATURE('sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects5Marco Moock
30 Oct 24 ii   `* Re: Problem with FEATURE('sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects4Claus Aßmann
30 Oct 24 ii    `* Re: Problem with FEATURE('sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects3HQuest
31 Oct 24 ii     `* Re: Problem with FEATURE('sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects2Claus Aßmann
11 Nov 24 ii      `- Re: Problem with FEATURE('sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects1Bjørn Mork
29 Oct 24 i`- Re: Problem with FEATURE(`sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects1Bjørn Mork
27 Dec 24 `* Re: Problem with FEATURE(`sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects3Marco Moock
27 Dec 24  `* Re: Problem with FEATURE(`sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects2Bjørn Mork
27 Dec 24   `- Re: Problem with FEATURE(`sts'): bogus "not listed in SANs" rejects1Marco Moock
25 Dec 24 * compile-time options list3Marco Moock
25 Dec 24 `* Re: compile-time options list2Claus Aßmann
25 Dec 24  `- Re: compile-time options list1Marco Moock
22 Dec 24 o mail @example.com without dns a-record for example.com1Salvador Mirzo
11 Dec 24 * How to know local IP on which mail was received on5AMM
11 Dec 24 `* Re: How to know local IP on which mail was received on4Claus Aßmann
11 Dec 24  `* Re: How to know local IP on which mail was received on3AMM
11 Dec 24   `* Re: How to know local IP on which mail was received on2Claus Aßmann
12 Dec 24    `- Re: How to know local IP on which mail was received on1Grant Taylor
3 Dec 24 * Mail sent to users that don't read mail?4Knute Johnson
4 Dec 24 +- Re: Mail sent to users that don't read mail?1Bjørn Mork
4 Dec 24 +- Re: Mail sent to users that don't read mail?1Claus Aßmann
9 Dec 24 `- Re: Mail sent to users that don't read mail?1Knute Johnson
12 Nov 24 * dmarc=fail: sendmail, spf, dkim and opendmarc4Wolfgang Agnes
12 Nov 24 `* Re: dmarc=fail: sendmail, spf, dkim and opendmarc3Marco Moock
13 Nov 24  `* Re: dmarc=fail: sendmail, spf, dkim and opendmarc2Wolfgang Agnes
13 Nov 24   `- Re: dmarc=fail: sendmail, spf, dkim and opendmarc1Marco Moock
7 Nov 24 * sendmail AUTH15Wolfgang Agnes
8 Nov 24 +* Re: sendmail AUTH13Andrzej Adam Filip
8 Nov 24 i`* Re: sendmail AUTH12Wolfgang Agnes
8 Nov 24 i +* Re: sendmail AUTH6Kalevi Kolttonen
8 Nov 24 i i`* Re: sendmail AUTH5Wolfgang Agnes
8 Nov 24 i i +* Re: sendmail AUTH2Kalevi Kolttonen
9 Nov 24 i i i`- Re: sendmail AUTH1Wolfgang Agnes
8 Nov 24 i i `* Re: sendmail AUTH2Bjørn Mork
9 Nov 24 i i  `- Re: sendmail AUTH1Wolfgang Agnes
8 Nov 24 i `* Re: sendmail AUTH5Andrzej Adam Filip
8 Nov 24 i  +- Re: sendmail AUTH1Wolfgang Agnes
9 Nov 24 i  `* Re: sendmail AUTH3Wolfgang Agnes
10 Nov 24 i   `* Re: sendmail AUTH2Claus Aßmann
11 Nov 24 i    `- Re: sendmail AUTH1Wolfgang Agnes
8 Nov 24 `- Re: sendmail AUTH1Wolfgang Agnes
5 Nov 24 * Is there an unambiguous syntax for URLs in a mail item?2Kenny McCormack
5 Nov 24 `- Re: Is there an unambiguous syntax for URLs in a mail item?1Marco Moock
4 Sep 24 * Forwarding problem with aliases13Knute Johnson
5 Sep 24 +* Re: Forwarding problem with aliases10Marco Moock
5 Sep 24 i`* Re: Forwarding problem with aliases9Knute Johnson
6 Sep 24 i `* Re: Forwarding problem with aliases8Marco Moock
6 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Forwarding problem with aliases1Knute Johnson
26 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Forwarding problem with aliases6Grant Taylor
26 Oct 24 i   `* Re: Forwarding problem with aliases5Marco Moock
26 Oct 24 i    +* Re: Forwarding problem with aliases3John Levine
27 Oct 24 i    i`* Re: Forwarding problem with aliases2Marco Moock
27 Oct 24 i    i `- Re: Forwarding problem with aliases1HQuest
27 Oct 24 i    `- Re: Forwarding problem with aliases1Grant Taylor
6 Sep 24 `* Re: Forwarding problem with aliases2Claus Aßmann
6 Sep 24  `- Re: Forwarding problem with aliases1Knute Johnson
3 Oct 24 * strange host lookups2Marco Moock
3 Oct 24 `- Re: strange host lookups1Claus Aßmann
22 Sep 24 * tempfail for bar LF2Marco Moock
22 Sep 24 `- Re: tempfail for bar LF1Claus Aßmann
3 Aug 24 * access data base question?12Knute Johnson
4 Aug 24 +* Re: access data base question?2HQuest
4 Aug 24 i`- Re: access data base question?1Knute Johnson
4 Aug 24 +* Re: access data base question?2Grant Taylor
4 Aug 24 i`- Re: access data base question?1Knute Johnson
4 Aug 24 `* Re: access data base question?7Claus Aßmann
4 Aug 24  `* Re: access data base question?6Knute Johnson
4 Aug 24   `* Re: access data base question?5Claus Aßmann
4 Aug 24    `* Re: access data base question?4Knute Johnson
5 Aug 24     `* Re: access data base question?3Claus Aßmann
5 Aug 24      `* Re: access data base question?2Knute Johnson
8 Aug 24       `- Re: access data base question?1Grant Taylor
29 Jul 24 * key / crt permissions constantly13none
29 Jul 24 +* Re: key / crt permissions constantly6Marco Moock
29 Jul 24 i+* Re: key / crt permissions constantly3none
29 Jul 24 ii`* Re: key / crt permissions constantly2Marco Moock
29 Jul 24 ii `- Re: key / crt permissions constantly1Claus Aßmann
29 Jul 24 i+- Re: key / crt permissions constantly1HQuest
29 Jul 24 i`- Re: key / crt permissions constantly1none
29 Jul 24 +* Re: key / crt permissions constantly4Claus Aßmann
29 Jul 24 i`* Re: key / crt permissions constantly3none
30 Jul 24 i `* Re: key / crt permissions constantly2Claus Aßmann
31 Jul 24 i  `- Re: key / crt permissions constantly1none
1 Aug 24 `* Re: key / crt permissions constantly2Claus Aßmann
1 Aug 24  `- Re: key / crt permissions constantly1none
26 Jul 24 * what is the equivalent to Postfix's X-Original-To3none
26 Jul 24 `* Re: what is the equivalent to Postfix's X-Original-To2Lew Pitcher
28 Jul 24  `- Re: what is the equivalent to Postfix's X-Original-To1none
30 Jul 03 * Free lesson to learn Tamil language2Mr. Ambrose Sabastian
30 Jul 03 `- Re: Free lesson to learn Tamil language1AcCeSsDeNiEd

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal