comp.misc

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789
Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 May 25 * Banning Social Media For Under-16s68Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 May 25 +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s16Rod Speed
15 May 25 i+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s14Petzl
15 May 25 ii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Richmond
15 May 25 iii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
15 May 25 iiii`- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 iii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6MightyMouse
16 May 25 iii  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 iii   +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii   i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2vallor
16 May 25 iii   i `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 iii   `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Frank Slootweg
15 May 25 ii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
15 May 25 ii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
15 May 25 ii  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
4 Jun10:28 i`- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Kerr-Mudd, John
16 May 25 +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Computer Nerd Kev
16 May 25 i+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
16 May 25 i+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Scott Dorsey
16 May 25 i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 May 25 i `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Computer Nerd Kev
16 May 25 `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s46BR
16 May 25  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Tony
17 May 25  +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s21MightyMouse
17 May 25  i+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii+- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii+* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Petzl
17 May 25  iii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
17 May 25  iii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Petzl
17 May 25  iii  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  ii`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4MightyMouse
17 May 25  ii `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Rod Speed
18 May 25  ii  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2MightyMouse
18 May 25  ii   `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Petzl
17 May 25  i +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6Rod Speed
17 May 25  i i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5Petzl
17 May 25  i i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Rod Speed
18 May 25  i i  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Petzl
18 May 25  i i   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Rod Speed
18 May 25  i i    `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rich80105
19 May 25  i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Peter Jason
19 May 25  i  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Peter Jason
19 May 25  i  `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
17 May 25  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s23Frank Slootweg
17 May 25   +* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s19Scott Dorsey
18 May 25   i`* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 May 25   i +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rich80105
18 May 25   i +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
22 May 25   i `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s15Scott Dorsey
22 May 25   i  +- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Rod Speed
22 May 25   i  `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s13Peter Jason
23 May 25   i   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s12Rod Speed
23 May 25   i    `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s11Peter Jason
23 May 25   i     `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s10Rod Speed
5 Jun02:53   i      `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s9Peter Jason
5 Jun09:41   i       `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s8Rod Speed
5 Jun22:03   i        `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s7Peter Jason
5 Jun22:48   i         `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s6Rod Speed
6 Jun07:08   i          `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s5noel
7 Jun00:49   i           `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s4Peter Jason
7 Jun07:53   i            `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3MightyMouse
7 Jun09:37   i             `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Rod Speed
7 Jun10:07   i              `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1MightyMouse
4 Jun10:36   `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s3Kerr-Mudd, John
4 Jun21:14    `* Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s2Mike Spencer
5 Jun10:26     `- Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s1Kerr-Mudd, John
7 Jun08:33 * 🇦🇺 Navy Ship Causes Internet Outage In Parts Of 🇳🇿2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jun09:02 `- Re: ?? Navy Ship Causes Internet Outage In Parts Of ??1Tony
1 Jun22:24 * 24 years after Steve Jobs was told stores won't work5Retrograde
2 Jun04:09 +- Re: 24 years after Steve Jobs was told stores won't work1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun11:43 `* Re: 24 years after Steve Jobs was told stores won't work3Theo
6 Jun01:26  `* Re: 24 years after Steve Jobs was told stores won't work2Retrograde
6 Jun06:39   `- Re: 24 years after Steve Jobs was told stores won't work1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jun03:21 o Phoronix turns 21: thanks for all the hardware reviews1Retrograde
5 Jun03:34 * Who Are “nxcli.net”?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jun16:59 `- Re: Who Are “nxcli.net”?1Ethan Carter
31 May14:07 * AI is Dehumanizing Technology5Ben Collver
31 May15:18 +- Re: AI is Dehumanizing Technology1D
1 Jun21:08 `* Re: AI is Dehumanizing Technology3Stefan Ram
2 Jun14:59  `* Re: AI is Dehumanizing Technology2Ben Collver
5 Jun16:46   `- Re: AI is Dehumanizing Technology1Ethan Carter
5 Jun01:44 * physicality is the next UI2Retrograde
5 Jun06:23 `- Re: physicality is the next UI1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 * JWNO: tiling WM for Windows4Retrograde
22 May 25 `* Re: JWNO: tiling WM for Windows3candycanearter07
4 Jun10:44  `* Re: JWNO: tiling WM for Windows2Kerr-Mudd, John
5 Jun04:20   `- Re: JWNO: tiling WM for Windows1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jun22:26 * Flatpak not being actively developed4Retrograde
2 Jun21:11 `* Re: Flatpak not being actively developed3John McCue
2 Jun23:56  `* Re: Flatpak not being actively developed2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun02:34   `- Re: Flatpak not being actively developed1jmclnx
31 May 25 * Alexa oddity4Chris J Dixon
31 May 25 +* Re: Alexa oddity2David LaRue
31 May15:35 i`- Re: Alexa oddity1Chris J Dixon
31 May16:30 `- Re: Alexa oddity1Richmond
29 May 25 o The Hobby Computer Culture1Ben Collver
21 Apr 25 * Wondering ...17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Apr 25 +- Re: Wondering ...1Ethan Carter
22 Apr 25 `* Re: Wondering ...15candycanearter07
22 Apr 25  `* Re: Wondering ...14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Apr 25   +* Re: Wondering ...7mm0fmf
24 Apr 25   i`* Re: Wondering ...6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Apr 25   i +* Re: Wondering ...2candycanearter07
25 Apr 25   i i`- Re: Wondering ...1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 May 25   i `* Re: Wondering ...3hrtuybxi
28 May 25   i  +- Re: Wondering ...1Rich
29 May 25   i  `- Re: Wondering ...1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Apr 25   `* Re: Wondering ...6Jim Jackson
25 Apr 25    +- Re: Wondering ...1yeti
26 Apr 25    +- Re: Wondering ...1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Apr 25    `* Re: Wondering ...3candycanearter07
27 Apr 25     `* Re: Wondering ...2Sn!pe
28 Apr 25      `- Re: Wondering ...1candycanearter07
21 May 25 * you don't want AI? Too bad, we're force feeding it6Retrograde
21 May 25 +- Re: you don't want AI? Too bad, we're force feeding it1D Finnigan
21 May 25 `* Re: you don't want AI? Too bad, we're force feeding it4Stefan Ram
22 May 25  +- Re: you don't want AI? Too bad, we're force feeding it1D
25 May 25  `* Re: you don't want AI? Too bad, we're force feeding it2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 May 25   `- Re: you don't want AI? Too bad, we're force feeding it1Retrograde
27 May 25 o Deanonymizing Pseudonymity1D
26 May 25 o troll farm advertising executive1D
16 May 25 o Detecting Malicious Unicode1Ben Collver
15 May 25 * Screenless Drawing Tablets Are Still A Thing2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 May 25 `- Re: Screenless Drawing Tablets Are Still A Thing1candycanearter07
7 May 25 * Mira Pro e-ink monitor by Boox4Retrograde
7 May 25 +- Re: Mira Pro e-ink monitor by Boox1Rich
15 May 25 `* Re: Mira Pro e-ink monitor by Boox2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 May 25  `- Re: Mira Pro e-ink monitor by Boox1Scott Dorsey
14 May 25 o SUBLEQ and Eforth1anthk
1 Apr 25 * On Binary Digits17Ben Collver
1 Apr 25 +- Re: On Binary Digits1Stefan Ram
1 Apr 25 +* Re: On Binary Digits9Richmond
2 Apr 25 i`* Re: On Binary Digits8Ben Collver
2 Apr 25 i +* Re: On Binary Digits5Aharon Robbins
2 Apr 25 i i+- Re: On Binary Digits1Bob Eager
4 Apr 25 i i`* Re: On Binary Digits3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 May 25 i i `* Re: On Binary Digits2anthk
12 May 25 i i  `- Re: On Binary Digits1Richmond
2 Apr 25 i `* Re: On Binary Digits2Bob Eager
3 Apr 25 i  `- Re: On Binary Digits1Anton Shepelev
1 Apr 25 +- Re: On Binary Digits1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Apr 25 `* Re: On Binary Digits5vallor
3 Apr 25  `* Re: On Binary Digits4Sn!pe
3 Apr 25   +- Re: On Binary Digits1Scott Dorsey
4 Apr 25   `* Re: On Binary Digits2vallor
4 Apr 25    `- Re: On Binary Digits1Sn!pe
17 Mar 25 * the computer built to last 50 years11Salvador Mirzo
18 Mar 25 +* Re: the computer built to last 50 years7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 25 i+* Re: the computer built to last 50 years5Bruce
18 Mar 25 ii`* Re: the computer built to last 50 years4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Mar 25 ii `* Re: the computer built to last 50 years3Bruce
19 Mar 25 ii  +- Re: the computer built to last 50 years1Bob Eager
20 Mar 25 ii  `- Re: the computer built to last 50 years1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 May 25 i`- Re: the computer built to last 50 years1anthk
18 Mar 25 +- Re: the computer built to last 50 years1anthk
18 Mar 25 `* Re: the computer built to last 50 years2Stefan Ram
18 Mar 25  `- Re: the computer built to last 50 years1Computer Nerd Kev
18 Mar 25 * bad bot behavior18Ben Collver
18 Mar 25 `* Re: bad bot behavior17D Finnigan
18 Mar 25  +- Re: bad bot behavior1Computer Nerd Kev
18 Mar 25  `* Re: bad bot behavior15Toaster
19 Mar 25   +* Re: bad bot behavior13Ian
19 Mar 25   i+* Re: bad bot behavior2Rich
23 Mar 25   ii`- Re: bad bot behavior1candycanearter07
20 Mar 25   i+* Re: bad bot behavior5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Mar 25   ii`* Re: bad bot behavior4Ian
21 Mar 25   ii +- Re: bad bot behavior1Toaster
21 Mar 25   ii `* Re: bad bot behavior2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Mar 25   ii  `- Re: bad bot behavior1Ian
23 Mar 25   i+* Re: bad bot behavior4candycanearter07
26 Mar 25   ii`* Re: bad bot behavior3D Finnigan
26 Mar 25   ii +- Re: bad bot behavior1candycanearter07
26 Mar 25   ii `- Re: bad bot behavior1Computer Nerd Kev
12 May 25   i`- Re: bad bot behavior1anthk
12 May 25   `- Re: bad bot behavior1anthk
11 May 25 o software bloat and security in 20251Retrograde
11 May 25 o Win Surface laptops 256GB RAM base model1Retrograde
1 May 25 * Re: Inside an IBM z1733Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 May 25 +* Re: Inside an IBM z172Scott Dorsey
2 May 25 i`- Re: Inside an IBM z171Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 May 25 `* Re: Inside an IBM z1730Marco Moock
2 May 25  +- Re: Inside an IBM z171Scott Dorsey
3 May 25  `* Re: Inside an IBM z1728Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 May 25   +* Re: Inside an IBM z1723Marco Moock
3 May 25   i`* Re: Inside an IBM z1722Dan Espen
3 May 25   i +* Re: Inside an IBM z1718Scott Dorsey
3 May 25   i i`* Re: Inside an IBM z1717Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25   i i `* Re: Inside an IBM z1716Scott Dorsey
4 May 25   i i  `* Re: Inside an IBM z1715Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25   i i   `* Re: Inside an IBM z1714Scott Dorsey
4 May 25   i i    `* Re: Inside an IBM z1713Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 May 25   i i     `* Re: Inside an IBM z1712Scott Dorsey
5 May 25   i i      `* Re: Inside an IBM z1711Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 May 25   i i       +* Re: Inside an IBM z172Scott Dorsey
5 May 25   i i       i`- Re: Inside an IBM z171Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 May 25   i i       `* Re: Inside an IBM z178Dan Espen
5 May 25   i i        +* Re: Inside an IBM z176Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 May 25   i i        i`* Re: Inside an IBM z175Dan Espen
6 May 25   i i        i +- Re: Inside an IBM z171Rich
6 May 25   i i        i `* Re: Inside an IBM z173Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 May 25   i i        i  +- Re: Inside an IBM z171Scott Dorsey
9 May 25   i i        i  `- Re: Inside an IBM z171Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 May 25   i i        `- Re: Inside an IBM z171Scott Dorsey
3 May 25   i `* Re: Inside an IBM z173Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25   i  `* Re: Inside an IBM z172Scott Dorsey
4 May 25   i   `- Re: Inside an IBM z171Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 May 25   `* Re: Inside an IBM z174Scott Dorsey
3 May 25    `* Re: Inside an IBM z173Dan Espen
3 May 25     `* Re: Inside an IBM z172Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25      `- Re: Inside an IBM z171Dan Espen
18 Apr 25 * Re: Tinker WriterDeck8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Apr 25 +* Re: Tinker WriterDeck2mm0fmf
8 May 25 i`- Re: Tinker WriterDeck1Oregonian Haruspex
18 Apr 25 +* Re: Tinker WriterDeck3Scott Dorsey
18 Apr 25 i`* Re: Tinker WriterDeck2Anton Shepelev
19 Apr 25 i `- Re: Tinker WriterDeck1Scott Dorsey
18 Apr 25 +- Re: Tinker WriterDeck1candycanearter07
29 Apr 25 `- Re: Tinker WriterDeck1Visiblink
7 May 25 o Zhaoxin x86-64 processor1Retrograde
3 May 25 * Microsoft now forcing passkeys5Retrograde
4 May 25 +- Re: Microsoft now forcing passkeys1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 `* Re: Microsoft now forcing passkeys3candycanearter07
4 May 25  `* Re: Microsoft now forcing passkeys2Richmond
5 May 25   `- Re: Microsoft now forcing passkeys1Retrograde
18 Mar 25 * Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi28Sylvia Else
18 Mar 25 +* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi4yeti
18 Mar 25 i+- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1yeti
20 Mar 25 i`* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi2Stefan Ram
21 Mar 25 i `- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 25 +- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 25 +* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi5yeti
20 Mar 25 i+* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi3brian
20 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi2SH
21 Mar 25 ii `- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Mar 25 i`- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1Sn!pe
18 Mar 25 +* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi14john larkin
18 Mar 25 i+* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi7john larkin
19 Mar 25 ii+* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi3Sn!pe
20 Mar 25 iii`* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi2brian
21 Mar 25 iii `- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi3Tom Del Rosso
23 Mar 25 ii +- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1john larkin
24 Mar 25 ii `- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Mar 25 i`* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi6candycanearter07
23 Mar 25 i +* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi4piglet
24 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi3candycanearter07
24 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi2yeti
25 Mar 25 i i  `- Re: Totally OT: Colliding blocks that compute pi1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal