comp.unix.shell

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345
Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jun13:07 * Bad performance of back-references4Janis Papanagnou
1 Jun13:52 `* Re: Bad performance of back-references3Dan Cross
1 Jun14:07  `* Re: Bad performance of back-references2Janis Papanagnou
2 Jun12:20   `- Re: Bad performance of back-references1Dan Cross
8 May 25 * [ksh] Warning: pipe symbol within ${} should be quoted?4Janis Papanagnou
30 May20:52 `* Re: [ksh] Warning: pipe symbol within ${} should be quoted?3Martijn Dekker
30 May23:30  `* Re: [ksh] Warning: pipe symbol within ${} should be quoted?2Janis Papanagnou
31 May20:15   `- Re: [ksh] Warning: pipe symbol within ${} should be quoted?1Eric Pozharski
4 May 25 * How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII25Kenny McCormack
4 May 25 +* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII6Lew Pitcher
4 May 25 i+* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII3Kenny McCormack
4 May 25 ii`* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII2John-Paul Stewart
4 May 25 ii `- Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII1Kenny McCormack
5 May 25 i`* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII2Eli the Bearded
5 May 25 i `- Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII1Janis Papanagnou
12 May 25 `* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII18Chuck Martin
12 May 25  `* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII17Kenny McCormack
12 May 25   `* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII16Nuno Silva
12 May 25    +* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII14Kenny McCormack
12 May 25    i`* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII13Chris Elvidge
14 May 25    i `* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII12Brian Patrie
14 May 25    i  `* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII11Chris Elvidge
14 May 25    i   `* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII10Kaz Kylheku
14 May 25    i    +* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII7Janis Papanagnou
15 May 25    i    i`* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII6Alexis
15 May 25    i    i +- Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII1Janis Papanagnou
21 May 25    i    i `* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII4Lars Poulsen
22 May 25    i    i  `* Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May 25    i    i   +- Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII1Kaz Kylheku
22 May 25    i    i   `- Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII1Keith Thompson
15 May 25    i    +- Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII1Brian Patrie
15 May 25    i    `- Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII1Geoff Clare
12 May 25    `- Re: How to convert <binaryGlowMixedWithASCII> to pure ASCII1Eli the Bearded
8 May 25 * Lew Pitcher still around?10Ruben Safir
8 May 25 +- Re: Lew Pitcher still around?1Janis Papanagnou
9 May 25 `* Re: Lew Pitcher still around?8Lew Pitcher
10 May 25  +* Re: Lew Pitcher still around?4Lew Pitcher
10 May 25  i`* Re: Lew Pitcher still around?3Lars Poulsen
11 May 25  i `* Re: Lew Pitcher still around?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 May 25  i  `- Re: Lew Pitcher still around?1Keith Thompson
11 May 25  `* Re: Lew Pitcher still around?3Popping Mad
11 May 25   +- Re: Lew Pitcher still around?1Popping Mad
11 May 25   `- Re: Lew Pitcher still around?1Lew Pitcher
7 May 25 * Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?10Janis Papanagnou
7 May 25 +* Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?2Kaz Kylheku
7 May 25 i`- Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?1Janis Papanagnou
7 May 25 +* Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?3Lars Poulsen
7 May 25 i`* Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?2Janis Papanagnou
7 May 25 i `- Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?1Janis Papanagnou
7 May 25 `* Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?4Ben Bacarisse
7 May 25  `* Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?3Janis Papanagnou
7 May 25   `* Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?2Christian Weisgerber
7 May 25    `- Re: Create functional processing pipe (without eval)?1Janis Papanagnou
12 Apr 25 * GNU grep and files with nulls3Kenny McCormack
12 Apr 25 `* Re: GNU grep and files with nulls2John McCue
12 Apr 25  `- Re: GNU grep and files with nulls1Kaz Kylheku
8 Apr 25 * LOL, managed to suspend "fg" command somehow.4Kaz Kylheku
8 Apr 25 `* Re: LOL, managed to suspend "fg" command somehow.3Keith Thompson
8 Apr 25  `* Re: LOL, managed to suspend "fg" command somehow.2Kaz Kylheku
8 Apr 25   `- Re: LOL, managed to suspend "fg" command somehow.1Kaz Kylheku
18 Dec 24 * a sed question64Salvador Mirzo
18 Dec 24 +- Re: a sed question1John-Paul Stewart
19 Dec 24 +* Re: a sed question16Ralf Damaschke
19 Dec 24 i`* Re: a sed question15Salvador Mirzo
20 Dec 24 i `* Re: a sed question14Ralf Damaschke
20 Dec 24 i  `* Re: a sed question13Kenny McCormack
21 Dec 24 i   `* Re: a sed question12Ralf Damaschke
21 Dec 24 i    `* Re: a sed question11Kaz Kylheku
21 Dec 24 i     +* sed... (Was: a sed question)8Kenny McCormack
21 Dec 24 i     i`* Re: sed... (Was: a sed question)7Kaz Kylheku
21 Dec 24 i     i +* Re: sed... (Was: a sed question)4Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 i     i i`* Re: sed... (Was: a sed question)3Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 i     i i `* Re: sed...2Keith Thompson
22 Dec 24 i     i i  `- Re: sed...1Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 i     i `* Re: sed... (Was: a sed question)2Lars Poulsen
22 Dec 24 i     i  `- Re: sed... (Was: a sed question)1Kaz Kylheku
21 Dec 24 i     +- Re: a sed question1Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24 i     `- Re: a sed question1Ralf Damaschke
20 Dec 24 +* Re: a sed question18Janis Papanagnou
20 Dec 24 i+* Checking for right # of args in a shell script (Was: a sed question)3Kenny McCormack
20 Dec 24 ii`* Re: Checking for right # of args in a shell script (Was: a sed question)2Janis Papanagnou
20 Dec 24 ii `- Re: Checking for right # of args in a shell script (Was: a sed question)1Kenny McCormack
21 Dec 24 i+* Re: a sed question13Salvador Mirzo
21 Dec 24 ii+* Re: a sed question7Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 iii`* Re: a sed question6Keith Thompson
22 Dec 24 iii `* Re: a sed question5Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24 iii  +* Re: a sed question2Keith Thompson
22 Dec 24 iii  i`- Re: a sed question1Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24 iii  `* Re: a sed question2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Dec 24 iii   `- Re: a sed question1Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 ii+* Re: a sed question4Andy Walker
21 Dec 24 iii+- Re: a sed question1Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 iii`* Re: a sed question2Salvador Mirzo
21 Dec 24 iii `- Re: a sed question1Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 ii`- Re: a sed question1Helmut Waitzmann
22 Dec 24 i`- Re: a sed question1Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 `* Re: a sed question28Ed Morton
21 Dec 24  `* Re: a sed question27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Dec 24   +* Re: a sed question12Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24   i`* Re: a sed question11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Dec 24   i +* Re: a sed question9Keith Thompson
22 Dec 24   i i`* Re: a sed question8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Dec 24   i i `* Re: a sed question7Keith Thompson
22 Dec 24   i i  `* Re: a sed question6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Dec 24   i i   `* Re: a sed question5Keith Thompson
23 Dec 24   i i    `* Re: a sed question4Eric Pozharski
23 Dec 24   i i     `* Re: a sed question3Kenny McCormack
23 Dec 24   i i      +- Re: a sed question1Kaz Kylheku
24 Dec 24   i i      `- Re: a sed question1Eric Pozharski
22 Dec 24   i `- Re: a sed question1Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24   +- Re: a sed question1Kenny McCormack
22 Dec 24   +- Re: a sed question1Kaz Kylheku
23 Dec 24   `* Re: a sed question12Ed Morton
23 Dec 24    +- How to solve The Miracle (was Re: a sed question)1Janis Papanagnou
23 Dec 24    `* Re: a sed question10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Dec 24     +* Re: a sed question4Keith Thompson
24 Dec 24     i`* Re: a sed question3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Mar 25     i `* Re: a sed question2anthk
24 Mar 25     i  `- Re: a sed question1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Dec 24     `* Re: a sed question5Ed Morton
24 Dec 24      +- Dealing with four-year-olds... (Was: a sed question)1Kenny McCormack
24 Dec 24      `* Re: a sed question3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Dec 24       `* Re: a sed question2Kaz Kylheku
25 Dec 24        `- Arguing with a four-year-old (Was: a sed question)1Kenny McCormack
13 Mar 25 * Initiate command in another shell session?17Janis Papanagnou
13 Mar 25 +* Re: Initiate command in another shell session?6Dan Cross
13 Mar 25 i+- [OT] SunOS issue (historic) (was Re: Initiate command in another shell session?)1Janis Papanagnou
13 Mar 25 i`* Re: Initiate command in another shell session?4Janis Papanagnou
13 Mar 25 i `* Re: Initiate command in another shell session?3Dan Cross
14 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1Janis Papanagnou
16 Mar 25 i  `- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1Jim Diamond
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1Kaz Kylheku
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1David W. Hodgins
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1Christian Weisgerber
14 Mar 25 +* Re: Initiate command in another shell session?6Keith Thompson
14 Mar 25 i+- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1Kaz Kylheku
14 Mar 25 i+- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1Dan Cross
14 Mar 25 i`* Re: Initiate command in another shell session?3Christian Weisgerber
14 Mar 25 i `* Re: Initiate command in another shell session?2Kaz Kylheku
15 Mar 25 i  `- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1Christian Weisgerber
14 Mar 25 `- Re: Initiate command in another shell session?1Janis Papanagnou
5 Mar 25 * (shellcheck) SC21038Kenny McCormack
5 Mar 25 +* Re: (shellcheck) SC21032Helmut Waitzmann
6 Mar 25 i`- Re: (shellcheck) SC21031Kenny McCormack
5 Mar 25 `* Re: (shellcheck) SC21035Kaz Kylheku
5 Mar 25  +- Re: (shellcheck) SC21031Janis Papanagnou
5 Mar 25  +- Re: (shellcheck) SC21031Helmut Waitzmann
6 Mar 25  `* Re: (shellcheck) SC21032Kenny McCormack
6 Mar 25   `- Re: (shellcheck) SC21031Kaz Kylheku
5 Mar 25 * Another shellcheck rant...5Kenny McCormack
5 Mar 25 `* Re: Another shellcheck rant...4Kaz Kylheku
5 Mar 25  +- Re: Another shellcheck rant...1Janis Papanagnou
5 Mar 25  +- Re: Another shellcheck rant...1Kenny McCormack
5 Mar 25  `- Re: Another shellcheck rant...1Kenny McCormack
19 Feb 25 * Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue9Janis Papanagnou
19 Feb 25 +* Re: Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue4Christian Weisgerber
20 Feb 25 i+* Re: Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue2Janis Papanagnou
20 Feb 25 ii`- Re: Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Feb 25 i`- Re: Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue1Janis Papanagnou
19 Feb 25 +* Re: Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue3Dan Cross
20 Feb 25 i+- Re: Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue1Janis Papanagnou
20 Feb 25 i`- Re: Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue1Christian Weisgerber
20 Feb 25 `- Re: Sorting problem with Unix sort(1) with UTF-8 punctuation characters - locale issue1Lem Novantotto
18 Feb 25 * Calculating in other bases than 105Janis Papanagnou
18 Feb 25 +- Re: Calculating in other bases than 101Janis Papanagnou
18 Feb 25 +* Re: Calculating in other bases than 102Christian Weisgerber
19 Feb 25 i`- Re: Calculating in other bases than 101Janis Papanagnou
19 Feb 25 `- Re: Calculating in other bases than 101Janis Papanagnou
9 Feb 25 * lisp scripts30zara
9 Feb 25 +* Re: lisp scripts11Kaz Kylheku
9 Feb 25 i`* Re: lisp scripts10Keith Thompson
9 Feb 25 i +* OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)8Nuno Silva
9 Feb 25 i i+- Re: OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)1Kenny McCormack
9 Feb 25 i i+- Re: OT: web-based source hosting1Christian Weisgerber
10 Feb 25 i i+* Re: OT: web-based source hosting (was: Re: lisp scripts)3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Feb 25 i ii`* Re: OT: web-based source hosting2Nuno Silva
10 Feb 25 i ii `- Re: OT: web-based source hosting1D
10 Feb 25 i i`* Re: OT: web-based source hosting2Keith Thompson
10 Feb 25 i i `- Re: OT: web-based source hosting1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Feb 25 i `- Re: lisp scripts1Janis Papanagnou
9 Feb 25 `* Re: lisp scripts18Dan Espen
9 Feb 25  +* Re: lisp scripts12Kenny McCormack
9 Feb 25  i+* Re: lisp scripts5Dan Espen
9 Feb 25  ii`* Re: lisp scripts4Janis Papanagnou
9 Feb 25  ii `* Re: lisp scripts3Dan Espen
10 Feb 25  ii  `* Re: lisp scripts2Janis Papanagnou
10 Feb 25  ii   `- Re: lisp scripts1Janis Papanagnou
13 Feb 25  i`* Re: lisp scripts6Randal L. Schwartz
13 Feb 25  i `* Re: lisp scripts5Kaz Kylheku
14 Feb 25  i  +- Re: lisp scripts1Salvador Mirzo
14 Feb 25  i  `* Re: lisp scripts3Eberhard W Lisse
15 Feb 25  i   `* Re: lisp scripts2Dan Cross
16 Feb 25  i    `- Re: lisp scripts1Randal L. Schwartz
10 Feb 25  `* Re: lisp scripts5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Feb 25   +* Re: lisp scripts2Dan Espen
11 Feb 25   i`- Re: lisp scripts1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25   `* Re: lisp scripts2Eberhard W Lisse
14 Feb 25    `- Re: lisp scripts1Janis Papanagnou
12 Feb 25 o Basta update!1Kaz Kylheku
14 Jan 25 * Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?84Dan Cross
14 Jan 25 +- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Richard Harnden
20 Jan 25 `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?82Wayne
20 Jan 25  `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?81Janis Papanagnou
21 Jan 25   `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?80Axel Reichert
21 Jan 25    +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?7Janis Papanagnou
22 Jan 25    i+* Soft-links to binaries (was Re: Default PATH setting)4Janis Papanagnou
22 Jan 25    ii`* Re: Soft-links to binaries (was Re: Default PATH setting)3Keith Thompson
22 Jan 25    ii +- Re: Soft-links to binaries (was Re: Default PATH setting)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Jan 25    ii `- Re: Soft-links to binaries (was Re: Default PATH setting)1Janis Papanagnou
25 Jan 25    i`* PATH for GUI applications (was: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?)2Axel Reichert
26 Jan 25    i `- Re: PATH for GUI applications (was: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Jan 25    `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?72Geoff Clare
22 Jan 25     `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?71Kaz Kylheku
23 Jan 25      `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?70Geoff Clare
23 Jan 25       `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?69Kenny McCormack
23 Jan 25        +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?52Dan Cross
23 Jan 25        i`* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?51Janis Papanagnou
23 Jan 25        i +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?3Keith Thompson
24 Jan 25        i i`* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?2Janis Papanagnou
24 Jan 25        i i `- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Keith Thompson
23 Jan 25        i +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?3Kaz Kylheku
24 Jan 25        i i+- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Janis Papanagnou
24 Jan 25        i i`- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Jerry Peters
23 Jan 25        i +- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1marrgol
24 Jan 25        i `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?43Dan Cross
24 Jan 25        i  `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?42Janis Papanagnou
24 Jan 25        i   +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?14Dan Cross
25 Jan 25        i   i+* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?5Janis Papanagnou
25 Jan 25        i   ii`* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?4Dan Cross
26 Jan 25        i   ii +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?2Keith Thompson
27 Jan 25        i   ii i`- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Dan Cross
26 Jan 25        i   ii `- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Janis Papanagnou
26 Jan 25        i   i`* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?8Keith Thompson
26 Jan 25        i   i +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?3Janis Papanagnou
26 Jan 25        i   i i`* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?2Christian Weisgerber
27 Jan 25        i   i i `- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Janis Papanagnou
26 Jan 25        i   i `* Early history of Bash (was: Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?)4Christian Weisgerber
27 Jan 25        i   i  +- Re: Early history of Bash1Keith Thompson
27 Jan 25        i   i  `* Re: Early history of Bash2Keith Thompson
27 Jan 25        i   i   `- Re: Early history of Bash1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Jan 25        i   `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?27Keith Thompson
25 Jan 25        i    `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?26Janis Papanagnou
26 Jan 25        i     `* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?25Keith Thompson
26 Jan 25        i      +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?23Kaz Kylheku
26 Jan 25        i      i`* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?22Janis Papanagnou
26 Jan 25        i      i +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?2Kaz Kylheku
27 Jan 25        i      i i`- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Janis Papanagnou
26 Jan 25        i      i +* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?3Keith Thompson
3 Feb 25        i      i i`* Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?2Keith Thompson
3 Feb 25        i      i i `- Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible?1Kaz Kylheku

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal