news.software.nntp

Liste des Groupes 1
Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Sep 24 * ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)28Dan Mahoney
27 Sep 24 +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)8Adam H. Kerman
27 Sep 24 i+* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Matthew Ernisse
27 Sep 24 ii+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Adam H. Kerman
27 Sep 24 ii`- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Adam H. Kerman
29 Sep 24 i`* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)4vallor
1 Oct 24 i `* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Julien ÉLIE
2 Oct 24 i  +- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Adam H. Kerman
3 Oct11:48 i  `- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1vallor
27 Sep 24 +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Marco Moock
27 Sep 24 i+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1rek2 hispagatos
27 Sep 24 i`- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1D
27 Sep 24 +- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Heiko Schlichting
28 Sep 24 +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)12noel
28 Sep 24 i`* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)11Ray Banana
28 Sep 24 i +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)6Julien ÉLIE
28 Sep 24 i i+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Retro Guy
28 Sep 24 i i+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1D
28 Sep 24 i i`* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Adam H. Kerman
28 Sep 24 i i `* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)2Russ Allbery
29 Sep 24 i i  `- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Adam H. Kerman
28 Sep 24 i +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Heiko Schlichting
28 Sep 24 i i+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1The Doctor
28 Sep 24 i i`- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1noel
28 Sep 24 i `- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1noel
29 Sep 24 +- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1D
6 Oct23:34 `* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)2Julien ÉLIE
7 Oct12:35  `- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Marco Moock
21 Sep 24 o INN 2.x FAQ1Russ Allbery
10 Sep 24 * After a server reboot from scratch . . .2Stefan Ram
20 Sep 24 `- Re: After a server reboot from scratch . . .1Richard Kettlewell
13 Sep 24 * inn: recommended Message-ID question7Retro Guy
13 Sep 24 `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question6Urs Janßen
13 Sep 24  `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question5Retro Guy
13 Sep 24   `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question4Stefan Ram
13 Sep 24    `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question3Retro Guy
13 Sep 24     `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question2Julien ÉLIE
13 Sep 24      `- Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question1Retro Guy
11 Sep 24 * WendzelNNTPd2George Musk
11 Sep 24 `- Re: WendzelNNTPd1D
24 Aug 24 * [Cleanfeed] Block specific crosspost groups2Kyonshi
25 Aug 24 `- Re: [Cleanfeed] Block specific crosspost groups1Ray Banana
22 Aug 24 * Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number7Jon Ribbens
22 Aug 24 +* Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number3Urs Janßen
22 Aug 24 i+- Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number1Jon Ribbens
22 Aug 24 i`- Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number1D
22 Aug 24 `* Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number3Jon Ribbens
22 Aug 24  +- Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number1Jon Ribbens
22 Aug 24  `- Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number1Stefan Ram
5 Aug 24 o Re: stats 2024 July1kyonshi
28 Jul 24 o Re: stats 2024 MAy1Dennis Preiser
21 Jul 24 o INN 2.x FAQ1Russ Allbery
5 Jul 24 * Interacting with cnfs5Nigel Reed
5 Jul 24 +- Re: Interacting with cnfs1Ray Banana
6 Jul 24 +- Re: Interacting with cnfs1Nigel Reed
14 Jul 24 `* Re: Interacting with cnfs2Julien ÉLIE
15 Jul 24  `- Re: Interacting with cnfs1Nigel Reed
1 Jul 24 * Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server8Nigel Reed
1 Jul 24 +* Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server2Spammer
2 Jul 24 i`- Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server1Nigel Reed
1 Jul 24 +* Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server2Julien ÉLIE
2 Jul 24 i`- Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server1Nigel Reed
1 Jul 24 `* Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server3Ivo Gandolfo
3 Jul 24  `* Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server2Nigel Reed
3 Jul 24   `- Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server1Retro Guy
25 Jun 24 o [ANNOUNCE] INN 2.7.2 available1Russ Allbery
16 Jun 24 * Is there a better manual on Cleanfeed somewhere3Kyonshi
17 Jun 24 `* Re: Is there a better manual on Cleanfeed somewhere2Ray Banana
18 Jun 24  `- Re: Is there a better manual on Cleanfeed somewhere1Kyonshi
6 Jun 24 o Re: github.com/go-while/nntp-overview1Billy G. (go-while)
28 May 24 * innfeed.conf set dns-expire2Roberto CORRADO
29 May 24 `- Re: innfeed.conf set dns-expire1Billy G. (go-while)
28 May 24 * Information about: batch active update2Roberto CORRADO
28 May 24 `- Re: Information about: batch active update1Marco Moock
21 May 24 o INN 2.x FAQ1Russ Allbery
14 Apr 24 * Young people peering97The Doctor
14 Apr 24 +- Re: Young people peering1Marco Moock
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering5Retro Guy
14 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
14 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Young people peering2rek2 hispagatos
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Young people peering1dgold
15 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering5Stefan Ram
15 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering2candycanearter07
15 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
7 May 24 i`* Re: Young people peering2immibis
7 May 24 i `- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering3Niklas H
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering2John Levine
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1David Ritz
16 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering37Kyonshi
16 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering32The Doctor
17 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Young people peering30Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iii+* Re: Young people peering18Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii+* Re: Young people peering3Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiiii`* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
17 Apr 24 iiiii `- Re: Young people peering1Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiii`* Re: Young people peering14The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii +* Re: Young people peering4Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii i+* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
18 Apr 24 iiii ii`- Re: Young people peering1rek2 hispagatos
17 Apr 24 iiii i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii `* Re: Young people peering9SugarBug
14 May 24 iiii  `* Re: Young people peering8Van Camp
14 May 24 iiii   +* Re: Young people peering5Russ Allbery
15 May 24 iiii   i+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
15 May 24 iiii   ii`* Re: Young people peering2Russ Allbery
16 May 24 iiii   ii `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
19 May 24 iiii   i`- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
14 May 24 iiii   +- Re: Young people peering1Frank Slootweg
15 May 24 iiii   `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
18 Apr 24 iii`* Re: Young people peering11candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii `* Re: Young people peering10Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii  `* Re: Young people peering9candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii   `* Re: Young people peering8Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii    `* Re: Young people peering6Grant Taylor
18 Apr 24 iii     +* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     i`* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
19 Apr 24 iii     i `- Re: Young people peering1Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     `* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
19 Apr 24 iii      `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
17 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 i`* Re: Young people peering4Stefan Ram
18 Apr 24 i `* Re: Young people peering3Kerr-Mudd, John
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Young people peering2Computer Nerd Kev
19 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
19 Apr 24 `* Re: Young people peering43The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
19 Apr 24  `* Re: Young people peering42Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24   `* Re: Young people peering41Retro Guy
19 Apr 24    +* Re: Young people peering2Ted Heise
20 Apr 24    i`- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24    `* Re: Young people peering37The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
20 Apr 24     +* Re: Young people peering4Marco Moock
20 Apr 24     i`* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
21 Apr 24     i +- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24     i `- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24     +* Re: Young people peering31Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i+* [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)23The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24     ii+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.14Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     iii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24     iii+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.9Adam H. Kerman
21 Apr 24     iiii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.8Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     iiii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.7Marco Moock
21 Apr 24     iiii  +* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     iiii  i`- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1D
21 Apr 24     iiii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.4Retro Guy
21 Apr 24     iiii   +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     iiii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Marco Moock
21 Apr 24     iiii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24     iii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.3Imran Zukhova
22 Apr 24     iii +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24     iii `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Mr Ön!on
21 Apr 24     ii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1yeti
21 Apr 24     ii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1Marco Moock
16 May 24     ii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)6immibis
16 May 24     ii +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
16 May 24     ii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself4Hassan Nasrallah
17 May 24     ii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself3Hassan Nasrallah
17 May 24     ii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself2Sn!pe
17 May 24     ii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself1yeti
7 May 24     i+* Re: Young people peering3immibis
7 May 24     ii`* Re: Young people peering2Adam H. Kerman
7 May 24     ii `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
16 May 24     i`* Re: Young people peering4Blue-Maned_Hawk
16 May 24     i +- Re: Young people peering1Frank Slootweg
16 May 24     i +- Re: Young people peering1Adam H. Kerman
16 May 24     i `- Re: Young people peering1D
21 Apr 24     `- Re: Young people peering1yeti
17 May 24 * beagle.ediacara.org mail server error3Retro Guy
17 May 24 `* Re: beagle.ediacara.org mail server error2Ray Banana
17 May 24  `- Re: beagle.ediacara.org mail server error1Retro Guy
5 May 24 * Compacting CNFS buffers4Nigel Reed
7 May 24 `* Re: Compacting CNFS buffers3Julien ÉLIE
8 May 24  `* Re: Compacting CNFS buffers2Nigel Reed
13 May 24   `- Re: Compacting CNFS buffers1Julien ÉLIE
28 Mar 24 * Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math4Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24 `* Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math3Ross Finlayson
22 Apr 24  `* Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math2Ross Finlayson
25 Apr 24   `- Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math1Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24 * power loss while receiving news10Nigel Reed
21 Apr 24 `* Re: power loss while receiving news9Nigel Reed
21 Apr 24  `* Re: power loss while receiving news8Julien ÉLIE
21 Apr 24   +* Re: power loss while receiving news5Ray Banana
21 Apr 24   i`* Re: power loss while receiving news4Julien ÉLIE
22 Apr 24   i `* Re: power loss while receiving news3Jesse Rehmer
22 Apr 24   i  `* Re: power loss while receiving news2Julien ÉLIE
25 Apr 24   i   `- Re: power loss while receiving news1Nigel Reed
22 Apr 24   `* Re: power loss while receiving news2Nigel Reed
22 Apr 24    `- Re: power loss while receiving news1Julien ÉLIE
5 Apr 24 * Inn 2.7 cannot work2Jason Wang
6 Apr 24 `- Re: Inn 2.7 cannot work1Julien ÉLIE
26 Mar 24 * hamster16floffy@gallaxial.com
26 Mar 24 `* Re: hamster15Thomas Hochstein
27 Mar 24  `* Re: hamster14floffy@gallaxial.com
27 Mar 24   `* Re: hamster13Frank Slootweg
28 Mar 24    +* Re: hamster11kyonshi
28 Mar 24    i+- Re: hamster1Eric M
28 Mar 24    i+- Re: hamster1Frank Slootweg
28 Mar 24    i`* Re: hamster8candycanearter07
28 Mar 24    i +* Re: hamster4Eric M
28 Mar 24    i i`* Re: hamster3candycanearter07
28 Mar 24    i i `* Re: hamster2Eric M
28 Mar 24    i i  `- Re: hamster1Frank Slootweg
30 Mar 24    i `* Re: hamster3Kyonshi
1 Apr 24    i  +- Re: hamster1candycanearter07
1 Apr 24    i  `- Re: hamster1Internetado
28 Mar 24    `- Re: hamster1Internetado
24 Mar 24 * Re: INN 2.x FAQ8floffy@gallaxial.com
24 Mar 24 +* Re: INN 2.x FAQ2Russ Allbery
25 Mar 24 i`- Re: INN 2.x FAQ1Eric M
26 Mar 24 `* News server for Windows. (was: INN 2.x FAQ)5Frank Slootweg
26 Mar 24  +* Re: News server for Windows. (was: INN 2.x FAQ)2D
26 Mar 24  i`- Re: News server for Windows. (was: INN 2.x FAQ)1floffy@gallaxial.com
26 Mar 24  `* Re: News server for Windows. (was: INN 2.x FAQ)2candycanearter07
26 Mar 24   `- Re: News server for Windows. (was: INN 2.x FAQ)1floffy@gallaxial.com
16 Mar 24 o Re: Leafnode/Newslink question1floffy@gallaxial.com
16 Mar 24 o Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.1floffy@gallaxial.com
14 Mar 24 * IMAP NNTP gateway7kyonshi
14 Mar 24 +* Re: IMAP NNTP gateway4Andrew Rump
14 Mar 24 i`* Re: IMAP NNTP gateway3kyonshi
14 Mar 24 i `* Re: IMAP NNTP gateway2Julien ÉLIE
15 Mar 24 i  `- Re: IMAP NNTP gateway1kyonshi
14 Mar 24 +- Re: IMAP NNTP gateway1Markus Schaaf
15 Mar 24 `- Re: IMAP NNTP gateway1Grant Taylor
14 Mar 24 o Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math1Ross Finlayson
11 Mar 24 * Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet7David Chmelik
11 Mar 24 +* Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet2Ross Finlayson
12 Mar 24 i`- Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet1Ross Finlayson
13 Mar 24 `* Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet4immibis
13 Mar 24  `* Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet3Ross Finlayson
14 Mar 24   `* Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet2CPMST
14 Mar 24    `- Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet1Blue-Maned_Hawk
11 Mar 24 * Basic Cleanfeed questions3kyonshi
12 Mar 24 `* Re: Basic Cleanfeed questions2yamo'
14 Mar 24  `- Re: Basic Cleanfeed questions1kyonshi
13 Mar 24 * Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.2Adam W.
13 Mar 24 `- Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.1Julien ÉLIE
10 Mar 24 * Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet2Stefan Ram
10 Mar 24 `- Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet1Ross Finlayson
10 Mar 24 o Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet1immibis
10 Mar 24 o Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal