news.software.nntp

Liste des Groupes Pages :12
Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Dec09:01 o INN 2.x FAQ1Russ Allbery
27 Sep 24 * ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)31Dan Mahoney
27 Sep 24 +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)9Adam H. Kerman
27 Sep 24 i+* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Matthew Ernisse
27 Sep 24 ii+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Adam H. Kerman
27 Sep 24 ii`- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Adam H. Kerman
29 Sep 24 i+* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)4vallor
1 Oct 24 ii`* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Julien ÉLIE
2 Oct 24 ii +- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Adam H. Kerman
3 Oct 24 ii `- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1vallor
4 Dec 24 i`- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Nomen Nescio
27 Sep 24 +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Marco Moock
27 Sep 24 i+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1rek2 hispagatos
27 Sep 24 i`- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1D
27 Sep 24 +- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Heiko Schlichting
28 Sep 24 +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)12noel
28 Sep 24 i`* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)11Ray Banana
28 Sep 24 i +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)6Julien ÉLIE
28 Sep 24 i i+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Retro Guy
28 Sep 24 i i+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1D
28 Sep 24 i i`* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Adam H. Kerman
28 Sep 24 i i `* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)2Russ Allbery
29 Sep 24 i i  `- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Adam H. Kerman
28 Sep 24 i +* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)3Heiko Schlichting
28 Sep 24 i i+- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1The Doctor
28 Sep 24 i i`- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1noel
28 Sep 24 i `- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1noel
29 Sep 24 +- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1D
6 Oct 24 `* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)4Julien ÉLIE
7 Oct 24  +- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Marco Moock
17 Oct 24  `* Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)2Julien ÉLIE
4 Dec 24   `- Re: ISC will likely be shutting down FTP access to ftp.isc.org soon (https will remain)1Nomen Nescio
23 Nov 24 * Last version of INN2 for production instance14Roberto CORRADO
24 Nov 24 +* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance11Nigel Reed
24 Nov 24 i`* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance10Roberto CORRADO
24 Nov 24 i `* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance9Roberto CORRADO
24 Nov 24 i  +* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance3Roberto CORRADO
25 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance2candycanearter07
25 Nov 24 i  i `- Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance1roby
24 Nov 24 i  `* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance5Nigel Reed
24 Nov 24 i   `* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance4Roberto CORRADO
25 Nov 24 i    `* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance3Nigel Reed
25 Nov 24 i     `* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance2roby
26 Nov 24 i      `- Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance1Julien ÉLIE
26 Nov 24 `* Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance2Julien ÉLIE
27 Nov 24  `- Re: Last version of INN2 for production instance1roby
23 Nov 24 o mrtg scripts1Nigel Reed
21 Nov 24 o INN 2.x FAQ1Russ Allbery
5 Nov 24 * Improving trn: LISTGROUP with no arguments vs. ...?6Richard
5 Nov 24 +- Re: Improving trn: LISTGROUP with no arguments vs. ...?1Urs Janßen
5 Nov 24 `* Re: Improving trn: LISTGROUP with no arguments vs. ...?4Julien ÉLIE
6 Nov 24  `* Re: Improving trn: LISTGROUP with no arguments vs. ...?3Richard
6 Nov 24   `* Re: Improving trn: LISTGROUP with no arguments vs. ...?2Julien ÉLIE
18 Nov 24    `- Re: Improving trn: LISTGROUP with no arguments vs. ...?1Richard
3 Nov 24 * Is Leafnode still possible?4Jason Evans
3 Nov 24 `* Re: Is Leafnode still possible?3Ray Banana
3 Nov 24  +- Re: Is Leafnode still possible?1Jason Evans
9 Nov 24  `- Re: Is Leafnode still possible?1candycanearter07
29 Oct 24 * inn 2.7.0, expire takes ages and hangs6Adam W.
2 Nov 24 +* Re: inn 2.7.0, expire takes ages and hangs3Matija Nalis
5 Nov 24 i+- Re: inn 2.7.0, expire takes ages and hangs1Adam W.
5 Nov 24 i`- Re: inn 2.7.0, expire takes ages and hangs1Adam W.
2 Nov 24 `* Re: inn 2.7.0, expire takes ages and hangs2Julien ÉLIE
5 Nov 24  `- Re: inn 2.7.0, expire takes ages and hangs1Adam W.
11 Oct 24 * Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.3Schlomo Goldberg
11 Oct 24 `* Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.2Sn!pe
11 Oct 24  `- Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.1R Daneel Olivaw
10 Mar 24 * Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet2immibis
11 Oct 24 `- Re: Archive Any And All Text Usenet1Schlomo Goldberg
11 Oct 24 o Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.1Schlomo Goldberg
11 Oct 24 o Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.1Schlomo Goldberg
11 Oct 24 o Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.1Schlomo Goldberg
14 Apr 24 * Young people peering100The Doctor
14 Apr 24 +- Re: Young people peering1Marco Moock
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering6Retro Guy
14 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
14 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Young people peering2rek2 hispagatos
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Young people peering1dgold
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
10 Oct 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering5Stefan Ram
15 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering2candycanearter07
15 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
7 May 24 i`* Re: Young people peering2immibis
7 May 24 i `- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering3Niklas H
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering2John Levine
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1David Ritz
16 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering38Kyonshi
16 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering33The Doctor
17 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Young people peering31Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iii+* Re: Young people peering19Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii+* Re: Young people peering3Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiiii`* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
17 Apr 24 iiiii `- Re: Young people peering1Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiii`* Re: Young people peering15The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii +* Re: Young people peering4Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii i+* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
18 Apr 24 iiii ii`- Re: Young people peering1rek2 hispagatos
17 Apr 24 iiii i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii `* Re: Young people peering10SugarBug
14 May 24 iiii  +* Re: Young people peering8Van Camp
14 May 24 iiii  i+* Re: Young people peering5Russ Allbery
15 May 24 iiii  ii+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
15 May 24 iiii  iii`* Re: Young people peering2Russ Allbery
16 May 24 iiii  iii `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
19 May 24 iiii  ii`- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
14 May 24 iiii  i+- Re: Young people peering1Frank Slootweg
15 May 24 iiii  i`- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
10 Oct 24 iiii  `- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg
18 Apr 24 iii`* Re: Young people peering11candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii `* Re: Young people peering10Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii  `* Re: Young people peering9candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii   `* Re: Young people peering8Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii    `* Re: Young people peering6Grant Taylor
18 Apr 24 iii     +* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     i`* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
19 Apr 24 iii     i `- Re: Young people peering1Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     `* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
19 Apr 24 iii      `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
17 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 i`* Re: Young people peering4Stefan Ram
18 Apr 24 i `* Re: Young people peering3Kerr-Mudd, John
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Young people peering2Computer Nerd Kev
19 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
19 Apr 24 `* Re: Young people peering44The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
19 Apr 24  +* Re: Young people peering42Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24  i`* Re: Young people peering41Retro Guy
19 Apr 24  i +* Re: Young people peering2Ted Heise
20 Apr 24  i i`- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24  i +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24  i `* Re: Young people peering37The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
20 Apr 24  i  +* Re: Young people peering4Marco Moock
20 Apr 24  i  i`* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
21 Apr 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24  i  i `- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24  i  +* Re: Young people peering31Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  i+* [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)23The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24  i  ii+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.14Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24  i  iii+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.9Adam H. Kerman
21 Apr 24  i  iiii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.8Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.7Marco Moock
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  +* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  i`- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1D
21 Apr 24  i  iiii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.4Retro Guy
21 Apr 24  i  iiii   +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
21 Apr 24  i  iiii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Marco Moock
21 Apr 24  i  iiii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24  i  iii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.3Imran Zukhova
22 Apr 24  i  iii +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24  i  iii `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Mr Ön!on
21 Apr 24  i  ii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1yeti
21 Apr 24  i  ii+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1Marco Moock
16 May 24  i  ii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)6immibis
16 May 24  i  ii +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
16 May 24  i  ii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself4Hassan Nasrallah
17 May 24  i  ii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself3Hassan Nasrallah
17 May 24  i  ii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself2Sn!pe
17 May 24  i  ii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is very bad, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should kill yourself1yeti
7 May 24  i  i+* Re: Young people peering3immibis
7 May 24  i  ii`* Re: Young people peering2Adam H. Kerman
7 May 24  i  ii `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
16 May 24  i  i`* Re: Young people peering4Blue-Maned_Hawk
16 May 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Frank Slootweg
16 May 24  i  i +- Re: Young people peering1Adam H. Kerman
16 May 24  i  i `- Re: Young people peering1D
21 Apr 24  i  `- Re: Young people peering1yeti
10 Oct 24  `- Re: Young people peering1Schlomo Goldberg
10 Sep 24 * After a server reboot from scratch . . .2Stefan Ram
20 Sep 24 `- Re: After a server reboot from scratch . . .1Richard Kettlewell
13 Sep 24 * inn: recommended Message-ID question7Retro Guy
13 Sep 24 `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question6Urs Janßen
13 Sep 24  `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question5Retro Guy
13 Sep 24   `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question4Stefan Ram
13 Sep 24    `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question3Retro Guy
13 Sep 24     `* Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question2Julien ÉLIE
13 Sep 24      `- Re: inn: recommended Message-ID question1Retro Guy
11 Sep 24 * WendzelNNTPd2George Musk
11 Sep 24 `- Re: WendzelNNTPd1D
24 Aug 24 * [Cleanfeed] Block specific crosspost groups2Kyonshi
25 Aug 24 `- Re: [Cleanfeed] Block specific crosspost groups1Ray Banana
22 Aug 24 * Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number7Jon Ribbens
22 Aug 24 +* Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number3Urs Janßen
22 Aug 24 i+- Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number1Jon Ribbens
22 Aug 24 i`- Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number1D
22 Aug 24 `* Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number3Jon Ribbens
22 Aug 24  +- Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number1Jon Ribbens
22 Aug 24  `- Re: Efficiency of requesting by message-id vs group+number1Stefan Ram
5 Aug 24 o Re: stats 2024 July1kyonshi
28 Jul 24 o Re: stats 2024 MAy1Dennis Preiser
21 Jul 24 o INN 2.x FAQ1Russ Allbery
5 Jul 24 * Interacting with cnfs5Nigel Reed
5 Jul 24 +- Re: Interacting with cnfs1Ray Banana
6 Jul 24 +- Re: Interacting with cnfs1Nigel Reed
14 Jul 24 `* Re: Interacting with cnfs2Julien ÉLIE
15 Jul 24  `- Re: Interacting with cnfs1Nigel Reed
1 Jul 24 * Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server8Nigel Reed
1 Jul 24 +* Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server2Spammer
2 Jul 24 i`- Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server1Nigel Reed
1 Jul 24 +* Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server2Julien ÉLIE
2 Jul 24 i`- Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server1Nigel Reed
1 Jul 24 `* Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server3Ivo Gandolfo
3 Jul 24  `* Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server2Nigel Reed
3 Jul 24   `- Re: Right, I'm at it again...new usenet server1Retro Guy
25 Jun 24 o [ANNOUNCE] INN 2.7.2 available1Russ Allbery
16 Jun 24 * Is there a better manual on Cleanfeed somewhere3Kyonshi
17 Jun 24 `* Re: Is there a better manual on Cleanfeed somewhere2Ray Banana
18 Jun 24  `- Re: Is there a better manual on Cleanfeed somewhere1Kyonshi
6 Jun 24 o Re: github.com/go-while/nntp-overview1Billy G. (go-while)
28 May 24 * innfeed.conf set dns-expire2Roberto CORRADO
29 May 24 `- Re: innfeed.conf set dns-expire1Billy G. (go-while)
28 May 24 * Information about: batch active update2Roberto CORRADO
28 May 24 `- Re: Information about: batch active update1Marco Moock
21 May 24 o INN 2.x FAQ1Russ Allbery
17 May 24 * beagle.ediacara.org mail server error3Retro Guy
17 May 24 `* Re: beagle.ediacara.org mail server error2Ray Banana
17 May 24  `- Re: beagle.ediacara.org mail server error1Retro Guy
5 May 24 * Compacting CNFS buffers4Nigel Reed
7 May 24 `* Re: Compacting CNFS buffers3Julien ÉLIE
8 May 24  `* Re: Compacting CNFS buffers2Nigel Reed
13 May 24   `- Re: Compacting CNFS buffers1Julien ÉLIE
28 Mar 24 * Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math4Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24 `* Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math3Ross Finlayson
22 Apr 24  `* Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math2Ross Finlayson
25 Apr 24   `- Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.math1Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24 * power loss while receiving news10Nigel Reed
21 Apr 24 `* Re: power loss while receiving news9Nigel Reed
21 Apr 24  `* Re: power loss while receiving news8Julien ÉLIE
21 Apr 24   +* Re: power loss while receiving news5Ray Banana
21 Apr 24   i`* Re: power loss while receiving news4Julien ÉLIE
22 Apr 24   i `* Re: power loss while receiving news3Jesse Rehmer
22 Apr 24   i  `* Re: power loss while receiving news2Julien ÉLIE
25 Apr 24   i   `- Re: power loss while receiving news1Nigel Reed
22 Apr 24   `* Re: power loss while receiving news2Nigel Reed
22 Apr 24    `- Re: power loss while receiving news1Julien ÉLIE
5 Apr 24 * Inn 2.7 cannot work2Jason Wang
6 Apr 24 `- Re: Inn 2.7 cannot work1Julien ÉLIE
26 Mar 24 * hamster16floffy@gallaxial.com
26 Mar 24 `* Re: hamster15Thomas Hochstein
27 Mar 24  `* Re: hamster14floffy@gallaxial.com
27 Mar 24   `* Re: hamster13Frank Slootweg
28 Mar 24    +* Re: hamster11kyonshi
28 Mar 24    i+- Re: hamster1Eric M
28 Mar 24    i+- Re: hamster1Frank Slootweg
28 Mar 24    i`* Re: hamster8candycanearter07
28 Mar 24    i +* Re: hamster4Eric M

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal