sci.logic

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617
Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Jul15:09 * Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof11olcott
10 Jul15:38 +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof3joes
10 Jul15:55 i`* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof2olcott
11 Jul02:59 i `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
11 Jul02:58 `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof7Richard Damon
11 Jul04:58  `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof6André G. Isaak
11 Jul05:29   `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof5olcott
11 Jul05:42    +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof3André G. Isaak
11 Jul06:12    i`* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof2olcott
12 Jul18:09    i `- André G. Isaak still has not noticed his mistake1olcott
11 Jul14:35    `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
4 Jul 25 * Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller97olcott
4 Jul 25 `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller96Richard Damon
4 Jul 25  +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller85olcott
5 Jul 25  i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller84Richard Damon
5 Jul 25  i `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller83olcott
6 Jul01:44  i  `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller82Richard Damon
6 Jul04:02  i   `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller81Richard Damon
6 Jul05:34  i    `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller80olcott
6 Jul10:32  i     +- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Fred. Zwarts
6 Jul12:50  i     `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller78Richard Damon
6 Jul16:19  i      `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller77olcott
6 Jul18:00  i       `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller76Richard Damon
6 Jul21:06  i        `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller75olcott
7 Jul03:09  i         `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller74Richard Damon
7 Jul04:12  i          `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller73olcott
7 Jul08:36  i           +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller45Fred. Zwarts
7 Jul14:23  i           i+* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller11olcott
8 Jul09:10  i           ii`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller10Fred. Zwarts
8 Jul15:59  i           ii `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller9olcott
9 Jul10:58  i           ii  +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller7Fred. Zwarts
9 Jul14:46  i           ii  i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller6olcott
10 Jul12:17  i           ii  i +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller4Fred. Zwarts
10 Jul15:46  i           ii  i i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller3olcott
11 Jul10:02  i           ii  i i `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller2Fred. Zwarts
11 Jul22:17  i           ii  i i  `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1olcott
10 Jul12:41  i           ii  i `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Richard Damon
9 Jul12:32  i           ii  `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Richard Damon
7 Jul19:38  i           i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller33olcott
7 Jul23:41  i           i +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller31Richard Damon
8 Jul00:52  i           i i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller30olcott
8 Jul03:18  i           i i `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller29Richard Damon
8 Jul03:38  i           i i  `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller28olcott
8 Jul12:13  i           i i   `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller27Richard Damon
8 Jul16:08  i           i i    `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller26olcott
8 Jul23:31  i           i i     +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller3Richard Damon
8 Jul23:51  i           i i     i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller2olcott
9 Jul12:51  i           i i     i `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Richard Damon
9 Jul02:30  i           i i     +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller2olcott
9 Jul12:48  i           i i     i`- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Richard Damon
10 Jul03:50  i           i i     `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike20olcott
10 Jul12:35  i           i i      `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike19Richard Damon
10 Jul14:24  i           i i       `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike18olcott
11 Jul01:04  i           i i        `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike17Richard Damon
11 Jul01:27  i           i i         `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike16olcott
11 Jul03:10  i           i i          `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike15Richard Damon
11 Jul03:33  i           i i           `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike14olcott
11 Jul09:55  i           i i            +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike10Fred. Zwarts
11 Jul15:27  i           i i            i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike9olcott
11 Jul15:31  i           i i            i +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike7Fred. Zwarts
11 Jul18:50  i           i i            i i+* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike4olcott
12 Jul00:46  i           i i            i ii+- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike1Richard Damon
12 Jul09:22  i           i i            i ii`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike2Fred. Zwarts
12 Jul16:34  i           i i            i ii `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike1olcott
11 Jul22:27  i           i i            i i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike2olcott
12 Jul00:53  i           i i            i i `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike1Richard Damon
12 Jul00:41  i           i i            i `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike1Richard Damon
11 Jul14:42  i           i i            `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike3Richard Damon
11 Jul15:30  i           i i             `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike2olcott
12 Jul00:55  i           i i              `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike1Richard Damon
8 Jul09:17  i           i `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Fred. Zwarts
7 Jul12:19  i           +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller26Richard Damon
7 Jul14:32  i           i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller25olcott
7 Jul23:39  i           i `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller24Richard Damon
8 Jul00:47  i           i  `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller23olcott
8 Jul03:24  i           i   `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller22Richard Damon
8 Jul03:52  i           i    `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller21olcott
8 Jul08:55  i           i     +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller6Fred. Zwarts
8 Jul15:31  i           i     i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller5olcott
9 Jul10:04  i           i     i `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller4Fred. Zwarts
9 Jul14:16  i           i     i  `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller3olcott
10 Jul11:59  i           i     i   +- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Fred. Zwarts
10 Jul12:36  i           i     i   `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Richard Damon
8 Jul12:18  i           i     `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller14Richard Damon
8 Jul16:17  i           i      `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller13olcott
9 Jul09:58  i           i       +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller11Fred. Zwarts
9 Jul14:02  i           i       i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller10olcott
10 Jul11:54  i           i       i +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller8Fred. Zwarts
10 Jul15:35  i           i       i i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller7olcott
11 Jul09:52  i           i       i i `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller6Fred. Zwarts
11 Jul22:05  i           i       i i  `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller5olcott
12 Jul09:17  i           i       i i   `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller4Fred. Zwarts
12 Jul13:20  i           i       i i    +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller2Richard Damon
12 Jul16:43  i           i       i i    i`- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1olcott
12 Jul16:21  i           i       i i    `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1olcott
10 Jul15:04  i           i       i `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1olcott
9 Jul13:00  i           i       `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Richard Damon
8 Jul15:21  i           `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1olcott
4 Jul 25  +* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller9olcott
5 Jul 25  i+* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller5Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul 25  ii`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller4olcott
6 Jul10:24  ii `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller3Fred. Zwarts
6 Jul16:36  ii  `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller2olcott
7 Jul08:42  ii   `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul 25  i`* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller3Richard Damon
5 Jul 25  i `* Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller2olcott
6 Jul01:47  i  `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1Richard Damon
5 Jul 25  `- Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller1olcott
17 May 25 * Simple enough for every reader?215WM
18 May 25 +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?125Mikko
18 May 25 i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ross Finlayson
18 May 25 i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?123WM
18 May 25 i +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ross Finlayson
18 May 25 i i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
19 May 25 i i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
19 May 25 i i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
20 May 25 i i   `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
19 May 25 i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?117Mikko
19 May 25 i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?116WM
20 May 25 i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?115Mikko
20 May 25 i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?114WM
22 May 25 i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?113Mikko
22 May 25 i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?112WM
23 May 25 i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?111Mikko
23 May 25 i        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?110WM
24 May 25 i         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?109Mikko
24 May 25 i          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?108WM
25 May 25 i           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?107Mikko
25 May 25 i            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?106WM
26 May 25 i             `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?105Mikko
26 May 25 i              `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?104WM
27 May 25 i               `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?103Mikko
27 May 25 i                `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?102WM
28 May 25 i                 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?101Mikko
28 May 25 i                  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?100WM
29 May 25 i                   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?99Mikko
29 May 25 i                    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?98WM
30 May 25 i                     +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?96Mikko
30 May 25 i                     i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?95WM
31 May 25 i                     i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?94Mikko
31 May 25 i                     i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?93WM
1 Jun 25 i                     i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?92Mikko
1 Jun 25 i                     i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?91WM
3 Jun 25 i                     i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?90Mikko
3 Jun 25 i                     i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?89WM
4 Jun 25 i                     i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?88Mikko
4 Jun 25 i                     i        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?87WM
5 Jun 25 i                     i         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?86Mikko
5 Jun 25 i                     i          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?85WM
6 Jun 25 i                     i           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?84Mikko
6 Jun 25 i                     i            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?83WM
8 Jun 25 i                     i             `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?82Mikko
10 Jun 25 i                     i              `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?81WM
11 Jun 25 i                     i               `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?80Mikko
11 Jun 25 i                     i                `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?79WM
12 Jun 25 i                     i                 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?78Mikko
12 Jun 25 i                     i                  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?77WM
13 Jun 25 i                     i                   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?76Mikko
13 Jun 25 i                     i                    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?75WM
14 Jun 25 i                     i                     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?74Mikko
14 Jun 25 i                     i                      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?73WM
15 Jun 25 i                     i                       +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?71Mikko
15 Jun 25 i                     i                       i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?70WM
16 Jun 25 i                     i                       i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?69Mikko
16 Jun 25 i                     i                       i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?68WM
17 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?66Mikko
17 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?65WM
18 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?63Mikko
18 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?62WM
19 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?61Mikko
19 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?60WM
20 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?59Mikko
20 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?58WM
21 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?57Mikko
21 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?56WM
22 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?55Mikko
22 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?54WM
23 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?53Mikko
23 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?52WM
24 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?51Mikko
24 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?50WM
25 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i             `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?49Mikko
25 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i              `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?48WM
26 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i               `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?47Mikko
26 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i                `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?46WM
27 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i                 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?45Mikko
27 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i                  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?44WM
28 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i                   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?43Mikko
28 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i                    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?42WM
29 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i                     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?41Mikko
30 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i                      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?40WM
30 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i i                       +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2joes
1 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                       i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
2 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?37Mikko
2 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?36WM
2 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                         +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4joes
2 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                         i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
2 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                         i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2joes
2 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                         i  `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
3 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?31Mikko
3 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?30WM
3 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8joes
3 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6joes
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4joes
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2joes
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           i      `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?21Mikko
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?20WM
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                             +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2joes
4 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                             i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
5 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                             `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?17Mikko
5 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                              `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?16WM
5 Jul 25 i                     i                       i   i i                               +- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1joes
6 Jul09:34 i                     i                       i   i i                               `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14Mikko
6 Jul11:04 i                     i                       i   i i                                `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?13WM
7 Jul09:29 i                     i                       i   i i                                 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?12Mikko
7 Jul16:37 i                     i                       i   i i                                  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11WM
8 Jul08:46 i                     i                       i   i i                                   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Mikko
8 Jul16:47 i                     i                       i   i i                                    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
8 Jul16:59 i                     i                       i   i i                                     +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3joes
9 Jul17:32 i                     i                       i   i i                                     i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
10 Jul11:05 i                     i                       i   i i                                     i `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1joes
9 Jul09:34 i                     i                       i   i i                                     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Mikko
9 Jul17:35 i                     i                       i   i i                                      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
10 Jul10:47 i                     i                       i   i i                                       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
10 Jul10:58 i                     i                       i   i i                                        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
11 Jul09:22 i                     i                       i   i i                                         `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
24 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   i `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1joes
24 Jun 25 i                     i                       i   `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1joes
24 Jun 25 i                     i                       `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1joes
24 Jun 25 i                     `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1joes
18 May 25 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?89Ben Bacarisse
19 May 25  +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2olcott
19 May 25  i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
19 May 25  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?86WM
20 May 25   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?85Ben Bacarisse
20 May 25    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
20 May 25    i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
21 May 25    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse
20 May 25    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?81WM
21 May 25     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?80Ben Bacarisse
21 May 25      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?79WM
23 May 25       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?78Ben Bacarisse
24 May 25        +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?27Mikko
25 May 25        i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?26Ben Bacarisse
25 May 25        i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?25Mikko
26 May 25        i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?24Ben Bacarisse

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal