Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
3 Apr00:44 | Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-) | 3 | | Physfitfreak |
3 Apr00:51 |  Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-) | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
3 Apr01:50 |  Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-) | 1 | | Physfitfreak |
2 Apr13:32 | How? ? ? | 22 | | Richard Hachel |
2 Apr13:49 |  Re: How? ? ? | 15 | | efji |
2 Apr14:05 |   Re: How? ? ? | 6 | | Richard Hachel |
2 Apr14:14 |    Re: How? ? ? | 4 | | efji |
2 Apr15:24 |     Re: How? ? ? | 3 | | sobriquet |
2 Apr15:37 |      Re: How? ? ? | 2 | | efji |
2 Apr15:40 |       Re: How? ? ? | 1 | | Richard Hachel |
2 Apr14:40 |    Re: How? ? ? | 1 | | Python |
2 Apr14:37 |   Re: How? ? ? | 2 | | Python |
2 Apr14:56 |    Re: How? ? ? | 1 | | efji |
2 Apr20:53 |   Re: How? ? ? | 6 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
2 Apr20:55 |    Re: How? ? ? | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
2 Apr21:11 |    Re: How? ? ? | 4 | | efji |
2 Apr21:14 |     Re: How? ? ? | 2 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
2 Apr21:18 |      Re: How? ? ? | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
3 Apr01:08 |     Re: How? ? ? | 1 | | Moebius |
2 Apr14:21 |  Re: How? ? ? | 4 | | Python |
2 Apr14:31 |   Re: How? ? ? | 3 | | Richard Hachel |
2 Apr14:33 |    Re: How? ? ? | 2 | | Python |
2 Apr15:26 |     Re: How? ? ? | 1 | | Richard Hachel |
2 Apr15:30 |  Re: How? ? ? | 2 | | Python |
3 Apr01:10 |   Re: How? ? ? | 1 | | Moebius |
30 Mar07:24 | n-poly from a line... | 25 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
30 Mar08:29 |  Re: n-poly from a line... | 2 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
30 Mar08:44 |   Re: n-poly from a line... | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
31 Mar03:37 |  Re: n-poly from a line... | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
31 Mar14:40 |  Re: n-poly from a line... | 21 | | sobriquet |
31 Mar22:05 |   Re: n-poly from a line... | 20 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
31 Mar23:53 |    Re: n-poly from a line... | 19 | | sobriquet |
31 Mar23:57 |     Re: n-poly from a line... | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr05:48 |     Re: n-poly from a line... | 17 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr05:54 |      Re: n-poly from a line... | 16 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr11:46 |       Re: n-poly from a line... | 15 | | sobriquet |
1 Apr20:44 |        Re: n-poly from a line... | 2 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr20:56 |         Re: n-poly from a line... | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr21:10 |        Re: n-poly from a line... | 8 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr21:51 |         Re: n-poly from a line... | 6 | | Richard Hachel |
1 Apr21:55 |          Re: n-poly from a line... | 5 | | Richard Hachel |
1 Apr22:07 |           Re: n-poly from a line... | 3 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
2 Apr00:18 |            Re: n-poly from a line... | 2 | | Richard Hachel |
2 Apr00:32 |             Re: n-poly from a line... | 1 | | sobriquet |
1 Apr22:27 |           Re: n-poly from a line... | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr22:05 |         Re: n-poly from a line... | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr21:33 |        Re: n-poly from a line... | 4 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
2 Apr00:28 |         Re: n-poly from a line... | 3 | | sobriquet |
2 Apr20:40 |          Re: n-poly from a line... | 2 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
3 Apr00:39 |           Re: n-poly from a line... | 1 | | sobriquet |
28 Mar23:55 | Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 12 | | Physfitfreak |
29 Mar01:24 |  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 1 | | Bertitaylor |
30 Mar19:24 |  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 10 | | Physfitfreak |
30 Mar21:04 |   Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 9 | | Physfitfreak |
30 Mar21:12 |    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 2 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
1 Apr15:51 |     Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 1 | | Physfitfreak |
1 Apr17:39 |    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 6 | | Physfitfreak |
2 Apr00:48 |     Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 1 | | Bertitaylor |
2 Apr20:50 |     Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 4 | | Physfitfreak |
2 Apr20:54 |      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 3 | | Physfitfreak |
2 Apr21:07 |       Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 2 | | Physfitfreak |
2 Apr21:32 |        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) | 1 | | Physfitfreak |
12 Mar 25 | The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 414 | | WM |
12 Mar 25 |  Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 413 | | Alan Mackenzie |
12 Mar 25 |   Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 412 | | WM |
12 Mar 25 |    The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 411 | | Alan Mackenzie |
12 Mar 25 |     Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 407 | | WM |
12 Mar 25 |      Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 377 | | Alan Mackenzie |
12 Mar 25 |       Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 376 | | WM |
12 Mar 25 |        Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 375 | | Alan Mackenzie |
12 Mar 25 |         Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 6 | | Moebius |
13 Mar 25 |          Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
13 Mar 25 |          Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | Alan Mackenzie |
13 Mar 25 |           Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | Moebius |
13 Mar 25 |            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | WM |
13 Mar 25 |             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
13 Mar 25 |         Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 364 | | WM |
13 Mar 25 |          Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 362 | | Alan Mackenzie |
13 Mar 25 |           Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 360 | | WM |
13 Mar 25 |            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | joes |
13 Mar 25 |             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
13 Mar 25 |            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 356 | | Alan Mackenzie |
14 Mar 25 |             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 355 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 7 | | FromTheRafters |
14 Mar 25 |               Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 6 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |                Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 5 | | FromTheRafters |
14 Mar 25 |                 Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | FromTheRafters |
15 Mar 25 |                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" (thread too long, nothing in it) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
15 Mar 25 |                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 346 | | Alan Mackenzie |
14 Mar 25 |               Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 345 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |                Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 343 | | Alan Mackenzie |
14 Mar 25 |                 Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 342 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 334 | | Alan Mackenzie |
15 Mar 25 |                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 333 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                    Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | joes |
15 Mar 25 |                     Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                      Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | joes |
15 Mar 25 |                       Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                    Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 325 | | Alan Mackenzie |
15 Mar 25 |                     Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 324 | | WM |
16 Mar 25 |                      Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 319 | | Alan Mackenzie |
16 Mar 25 |                       Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 318 | | WM |
16 Mar 25 |                        Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 231 | | Jim Burns |
16 Mar 25 |                         Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 230 | | WM |
16 Mar 25 |                          Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 229 | | Jim Burns |
16 Mar 25 |                           Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 228 | | WM |
16 Mar 25 |                            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 227 | | Jim Burns |
16 Mar 25 |                             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 226 | | WM |
17 Mar 25 |                              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 225 | | Jim Burns |
17 Mar 25 |                               Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 224 | | WM |
17 Mar 25 |                                Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 223 | | Jim Burns |
17 Mar 25 |                                 Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 222 | | WM |
17 Mar 25 |                                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 221 | | Jim Burns |
18 Mar 25 |                                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 220 | | WM |
18 Mar 25 |                                    Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 219 | | Jim Burns |
18 Mar 25 |                                     Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 218 | | WM |
19 Mar 25 |                                      Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 217 | | Jim Burns |
19 Mar 25 |                                       Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 216 | | WM |
19 Mar 25 |                                        Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 215 | | Jim Burns |
20 Mar 25 |                                         Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 214 | | WM |
20 Mar 25 |                                          Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 213 | | Jim Burns |
20 Mar 25 |                                           Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 212 | | WM |
20 Mar 25 |                                            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 211 | | Jim Burns |
21 Mar 25 |                                             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 210 | | WM |
21 Mar 25 |                                              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 209 | | Jim Burns |
21 Mar 25 |                                               Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 208 | | WM |
21 Mar 25 |                                                The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 154 | | Alan Mackenzie |
21 Mar 25 |                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 40 | | Moebius |
21 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 37 | | Moebius |
21 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
21 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
21 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 34 | | Alan Mackenzie |
21 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 32 | | Moebius |
22 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
22 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 29 | | Ralf Bader |
22 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 28 | | Moebius |
22 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 2 | | Moebius |
22 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Moebius |
23 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 25 | | Ross Finlayson |
23 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 24 | | Jim Burns |
23 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 23 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 19 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 18 | | Jim Burns |
24 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 11 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 10 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 9 | | Ross Finlayson |
25 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 5 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 4 | | Ross Finlayson |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
26 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 6 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
27 Mar11:37 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 5 | | Jim Burns |
27 Mar12:46 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 4 | | FromTheRafters |
27 Mar15:05 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
27 Mar18:24 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
27 Mar18:53 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
24 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
22 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | joes |
22 Mar 25 |                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 113 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 78 | | joes |
23 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 77 | | WM |
23 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 76 | | Alan Mackenzie |
23 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 11 | | Moebius |
23 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 10 | | Alan Mackenzie |
24 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 8 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 7 | | Alan Mackenzie |
24 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Alan Mackenzie |
25 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
23 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 63 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 61 | | Alan Mackenzie |
25 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 60 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 59 | | Alan Mackenzie |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 55 | | WM |
26 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 54 | | Alan Mackenzie |
26 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 4 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
26 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 47 | | WM |
26 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 30 | | joes |
26 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 29 | | WM |
26 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 21 | | Alan Mackenzie |
26 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 15 | | Moebius |
27 Mar21:11 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 14 | | WM |
27 Mar22:45 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | joes |
2 Apr15:14 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | WM |
2 Apr20:54 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | joes |
28 Mar02:02 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 10 | | Moebius |
28 Mar06:02 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
2 Apr15:28 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar08:34 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 6 | | WM |
28 Mar11:39 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | joes |
2 Apr15:31 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar16:24 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
2 Apr15:45 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar19:03 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Jim Burns |
2 Apr15:25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
27 Mar21:15 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | WM |
27 Mar22:50 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | joes |
28 Mar16:45 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | Alan Mackenzie |
29 Mar04:39 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
2 Apr15:51 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
27 Mar15:59 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 7 | | joes |
27 Mar20:31 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 6 | | WM |
27 Mar22:31 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 3 | | joes |
2 Apr14:58 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 2 | | WM |
2 Apr20:39 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | joes |
28 Mar01:55 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
2 Apr15:18 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
27 Mar12:18 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 16 | | Alan Mackenzie |
27 Mar17:45 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 9 | | Moebius |
27 Mar18:50 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 8 | | Alan Mackenzie |
27 Mar19:29 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | FromTheRafters |
27 Mar22:01 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | Jim Burns |
28 Mar12:22 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Alan Mackenzie |
29 Mar04:32 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
2 Apr14:41 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
2 Apr15:38 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar01:35 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
27 Mar21:07 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 6 | | WM |
27 Mar22:41 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | joes |
28 Mar01:59 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
2 Apr15:20 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar17:32 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Alan Mackenzie |
2 Apr16:02 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | joes |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 34 | | Alan Mackenzie |