sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Apr00:44 * Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)3Physfitfreak
3 Apr00:51 +- Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Apr01:50 `- Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)1Physfitfreak
2 Apr13:32 * How? ? ?22Richard Hachel
2 Apr13:49 +* Re: How? ? ?15efji
2 Apr14:05 i+* Re: How? ? ?6Richard Hachel
2 Apr14:14 ii+* Re: How? ? ?4efji
2 Apr15:24 iii`* Re: How? ? ?3sobriquet
2 Apr15:37 iii `* Re: How? ? ?2efji
2 Apr15:40 iii  `- Re: How? ? ?1Richard Hachel
2 Apr14:40 ii`- Re: How? ? ?1Python
2 Apr14:37 i+* Re: How? ? ?2Python
2 Apr14:56 ii`- Re: How? ? ?1efji
2 Apr20:53 i`* Re: How? ? ?6Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr20:55 i +- Re: How? ? ?1Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr21:11 i `* Re: How? ? ?4efji
2 Apr21:14 i  +* Re: How? ? ?2Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr21:18 i  i`- Re: How? ? ?1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Apr01:08 i  `- Re: How? ? ?1Moebius
2 Apr14:21 +* Re: How? ? ?4Python
2 Apr14:31 i`* Re: How? ? ?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr14:33 i `* Re: How? ? ?2Python
2 Apr15:26 i  `- Re: How? ? ?1Richard Hachel
2 Apr15:30 `* Re: How? ? ?2Python
3 Apr01:10  `- Re: How? ? ?1Moebius
30 Mar07:24 * n-poly from a line...25Chris M. Thomasson
30 Mar08:29 +* Re: n-poly from a line...2Chris M. Thomasson
30 Mar08:44 i`- Re: n-poly from a line...1Chris M. Thomasson
31 Mar03:37 +- Re: n-poly from a line...1Chris M. Thomasson
31 Mar14:40 `* Re: n-poly from a line...21sobriquet
31 Mar22:05  `* Re: n-poly from a line...20Chris M. Thomasson
31 Mar23:53   `* Re: n-poly from a line...19sobriquet
31 Mar23:57    +- Re: n-poly from a line...1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr05:48    `* Re: n-poly from a line...17Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr05:54     `* Re: n-poly from a line...16Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr11:46      `* Re: n-poly from a line...15sobriquet
1 Apr20:44       +* Re: n-poly from a line...2Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr20:56       i`- Re: n-poly from a line...1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr21:10       +* Re: n-poly from a line...8Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr21:51       i+* Re: n-poly from a line...6Richard Hachel
1 Apr21:55       ii`* Re: n-poly from a line...5Richard Hachel
1 Apr22:07       ii +* Re: n-poly from a line...3Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr00:18       ii i`* Re: n-poly from a line...2Richard Hachel
2 Apr00:32       ii i `- Re: n-poly from a line...1sobriquet
1 Apr22:27       ii `- Re: n-poly from a line...1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr22:05       i`- Re: n-poly from a line...1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr21:33       `* Re: n-poly from a line...4Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr00:28        `* Re: n-poly from a line...3sobriquet
2 Apr20:40         `* Re: n-poly from a line...2Chris M. Thomasson
3 Apr00:39          `- Re: n-poly from a line...1sobriquet
28 Mar23:55 * Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)12Physfitfreak
29 Mar01:24 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
30 Mar19:24 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Physfitfreak
30 Mar21:04  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
30 Mar21:12   +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr15:51   i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr17:39   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
2 Apr00:48    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
2 Apr20:50    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
2 Apr20:54     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
2 Apr21:07      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
2 Apr21:32       `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 * The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series414WM
12 Mar 25 `* Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series413Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar 25  `* Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series412WM
12 Mar 25   `* The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series]411Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar 25    +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series]407WM
12 Mar 25    i+* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"377Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar 25    ii`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"376WM
12 Mar 25    ii `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"375Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar 25    ii  +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"6Moebius
13 Mar 25    ii  i+- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1WM
13 Mar 25    ii  i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"4Alan Mackenzie
13 Mar 25    ii  i `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"3Moebius
13 Mar 25    ii  i  `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"2WM
13 Mar 25    ii  i   `- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1joes
13 Mar 25    ii  +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"364WM
13 Mar 25    ii  i+* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"362Alan Mackenzie
13 Mar 25    ii  ii+* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"360WM
13 Mar 25    ii  iii+* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"3joes
13 Mar 25    ii  iiii`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"2WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iiii `- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1joes
13 Mar 25    ii  iii`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"356Alan Mackenzie
14 Mar 25    ii  iii `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"355WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"7FromTheRafters
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"6WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"5FromTheRafters
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i  `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"4WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i   `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"3FromTheRafters
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i    +- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" (thread too long, nothing in it)1Ross Finlayson
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i    `- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"346Alan Mackenzie
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"345WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"343Alan Mackenzie
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"342WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"334Alan Mackenzie
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"333WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"4joes
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"3WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"2joes
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i  `- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"325Alan Mackenzie
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"324WM
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"319Alan Mackenzie
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"318WM
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"231Jim Burns
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"230WM
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"229Jim Burns
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i  `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"228WM
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i   `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"227Jim Burns
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i    `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"226WM
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i     `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"225Jim Burns
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i      `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"224WM
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i       `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"223Jim Burns
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i        `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"222WM
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i         `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"221Jim Burns
18 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i          `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"220WM
18 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i           `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"219Jim Burns
18 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i            `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"218WM
19 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i             `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"217Jim Burns
19 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i              `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"216WM
19 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i               `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"215Jim Burns
20 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"214WM
20 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                 `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"213Jim Burns
20 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                  `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"212WM
20 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                   `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"211Jim Burns
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                    `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"210WM
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                     `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"209Jim Burns
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                      `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"208WM
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       +* The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]154Alan Mackenzie
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]40Moebius
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       ii+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]37Moebius
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iiii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1034Alan Mackenzie
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1032Moebius
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii i+- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101Ross Finlayson
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1029Ralf Bader
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1028Moebius
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 102Moebius
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101Moebius
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1025Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1024Jim Burns
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)23Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)19Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)18Jim Burns
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)11Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)10Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)9Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)3Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i  i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)2Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i  i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)5Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)4Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)3Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i     `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)2Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i      `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Jim Burns
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)6Chris M. Thomasson
27 Mar11:37    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)5Jim Burns
27 Mar12:46    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)4FromTheRafters
27 Mar15:05    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i    +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Jim Burns
27 Mar18:24    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)2Ross Finlayson
27 Mar18:53    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i     `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)3Jim Burns
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii     `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)2Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii      `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Jim Burns
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101WM
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101WM
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       ii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2WM
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       ii `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1joes
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]113WM
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]78joes
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]77WM
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]76Alan Mackenzie
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]11Moebius
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]10Alan Mackenzie
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]8WM
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]7Alan Mackenzie
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i   +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i   i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i   +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Alan Mackenzie
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i     `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]63WM
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]61Alan Mackenzie
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]60WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]59Alan Mackenzie
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3Moebius
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i  i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i  i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]55WM
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]54Alan Mackenzie
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]4Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    i i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]47WM
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]30joes
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]29WM
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]21Alan Mackenzie
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]15Moebius
27 Mar21:11    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]14WM
27 Mar22:45    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3joes
2 Apr15:14    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2WM
2 Apr20:54    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1joes
28 Mar02:02    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]10Moebius
28 Mar06:02    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
2 Apr15:28    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar08:34    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]6WM
28 Mar11:39    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2joes
2 Apr15:31    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  ii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar16:24    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
2 Apr15:45    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  ii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar19:03    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Jim Burns
2 Apr15:25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
27 Mar21:15    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5WM
27 Mar22:50    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101joes
28 Mar16:45    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3Alan Mackenzie
29 Mar04:39    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i  +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
2 Apr15:51    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i  `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
27 Mar15:59    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]7joes
27 Mar20:31    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]6WM
27 Mar22:31    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 103joes
2 Apr14:58    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 102WM
2 Apr20:39    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101joes
28 Mar01:55    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
2 Apr15:18    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i    `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
27 Mar12:18    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]16Alan Mackenzie
27 Mar17:45    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]9Moebius
27 Mar18:50    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]8Alan Mackenzie
27 Mar19:29    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1FromTheRafters
27 Mar22:01    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5Jim Burns
28 Mar12:22    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Alan Mackenzie
29 Mar04:32    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i ii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
2 Apr14:41    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i i+- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
2 Apr15:38    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar01:35    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
27 Mar21:07    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]6WM
27 Mar22:41    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i       +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101joes
28 Mar01:59    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i       +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
2 Apr15:20    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i       i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar17:32    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i       `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Alan Mackenzie
2 Apr16:02    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i        `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1joes
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]34Alan Mackenzie

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal