sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :12
Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Mar22:14 * The paradox of the Binary Tree5wm
16 Mar01:27 +- Re: The paradox of the Binary Tree1Ross Finlayson
16 Mar02:02 `* Re: The paradox of the Binary Tree3Chris M. Thomasson
16 Mar02:10  +- Re: The paradox of the Binary Tree1Chris M. Thomasson
16 Mar04:04  `- Re: The paradox of the Binary Tree1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
14 Mar06:59 * visualizing complex roots of polynomials5sobriquet
14 Mar20:09 +* Re: visualizing complex roots of polynomials3Chris M. Thomasson
15 Mar17:34 i`* Re: visualizing complex roots of polynomials2sobriquet
16 Mar02:16 i `- Re: visualizing complex roots of polynomials1Chris M. Thomasson
15 Mar03:37 `- Re: visualizing complex roots of polynomials1sobriquet
12 Mar18:38 * Re: energy and mass22Ronnie Pantelakos
12 Mar22:12 `* Re: energy and mass21Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
12 Mar23:11  `* Re: energy and mass20Tathan Nagahama
13 Mar01:47   `* Re: energy and mass19Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
14 Mar14:21    `* Re: energy and mass18Jairo Pantelakos
14 Mar16:23     `* GPS (was: energy and mass)17Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
14 Mar16:39      +* Re: GPS (was: energy and mass)3Brock Nakamura
14 Mar18:31      i`* Re: GPS2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
14 Mar18:43      i `- Re: energy and mass1Virgil Dömötör
14 Mar16:52      +* Re: GPS (was: energy and mass)8Kyndal Zsoldos
14 Mar18:37      i`* Re: GPS7Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
14 Mar20:49      i `* Re: GPS6Mikey Santiago
15 Mar15:29      i  `* Re: GPS5Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
15 Mar15:37      i   `* Re: GPS4Frauly Christakos
15 Mar19:22      i    `* Re: GPS3Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
15 Mar21:00      i     `* Re: energy and mass2Enmanuel Jacques
15 Mar22:40      i      `- GPS (was: energy and mass)1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
14 Mar18:16      `* Re: GPS5Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
14 Mar18:49       `* Re: GPS4Lowen Missiakos
14 Mar19:44        `* Re: GPS3Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
14 Mar20:39         +- Re: GPS1Ridge Górski
15 Mar15:44         `- Re: GPS1Krinden Hoffmann
15 Mar16:17 o Re: energy and mass1Donel Profeta
10 Mar17:51 * on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers27dart200
10 Mar19:24 +- Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers1Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar05:15 +* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers8dart200
12 Mar19:00 i+* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers6dart200
12 Mar20:51 ii+- Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers1Ross Finlayson
13 Mar05:44 ii+- Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers1dart200
13 Mar18:25 ii`* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers3dart200
14 Mar21:45 ii +- Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers1dart200
15 Mar15:02 ii `- Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers1Ross Finlayson
14 Mar21:43 i`- Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
12 Mar08:17 +* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers16Lawrence D’Oliveiro
12 Mar08:41 i`* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers15dart200
13 Mar06:53 i `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers14Lawrence D’Oliveiro
13 Mar08:30 i  `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers13dart200
13 Mar17:41 i   +* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers7dart200
13 Mar18:11 i   i`* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers6Richard Damon
13 Mar18:33 i   i `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers5dart200
13 Mar23:12 i   i  `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers4dart200
14 Mar05:43 i   i   `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers3dart200
14 Mar18:29 i   i    `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers2dart200
14 Mar20:56 i   i     `- Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers1dart200
14 Mar02:24 i   `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers5Lawrence D’Oliveiro
14 Mar05:25 i    `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers4dart200
14 Mar10:05 i     `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers3Tristan Wibberley
14 Mar18:02 i      `* Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers2dart200
14 Mar23:53 i       `- Re: on enumerating circle-free sequences: a fallacy in turing's paper on computable numbers1Tristan Wibberley
14 Mar20:35 `- Vanilla Prolog: semi-decidable =\= decidable (Was: on enumerating circle-free sequences)1Mild Shock
6 Mar 26 * Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics50olcott
7 Mar 26 +* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics4Tristan Wibberley
7 Mar 26 i+- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1olcott
7 Mar 26 i`* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26 i `- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1olcott
7 Mar 26 +* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics11Lawrence D’Oliveiro
7 Mar 26 i+* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics9olcott
7 Mar 26 ii`* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics8Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26 ii `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics7olcott
7 Mar 26 ii  +* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2Tristan Wibberley
7 Mar 26 ii  i`- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1olcott
8 Mar 26 ii  +* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26 ii  i`- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1olcott
8 Mar 26 ii  `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2Tristan Wibberley
8 Mar 26 ii   `- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26 i`- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26 `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics34Mikko
7 Mar 26  `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics33olcott
8 Mar 26   `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics32Mikko
8 Mar 26    +* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics26olcott
9 Mar08:35    i`* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics25Mikko
9 Mar13:27    i `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics24olcott
10 Mar09:28    i  `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics23Mikko
10 Mar14:47    i   +* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics18olcott
11 Mar09:37    i   i+* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics6Mikko
12 Mar14:31    i   ii`* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics5olcott
14 Mar10:02    i   ii `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics4Mikko
14 Mar15:09    i   ii  `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics3olcott
15 Mar11:27    i   ii   `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2Mikko
15 Mar14:22    i   ii    `- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1olcott
11 Mar17:44    i   i`* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics11olcott
11 Mar18:30    i   i +* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics5Tristan Wibberley
11 Mar20:06    i   i i`* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics4olcott
12 Mar00:49    i   i i `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics3Tristan Wibberley
12 Mar01:30    i   i i  `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2olcott
12 Mar14:35    i   i i   `- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1olcott
12 Mar10:08    i   i `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics5Mikko
12 Mar14:18    i   i  `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics4olcott
14 Mar10:06    i   i   `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics3Mikko
14 Mar15:12    i   i    `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2olcott
15 Mar11:28    i   i     `- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1Mikko
10 Mar16:20    i   `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics4Ross Finlayson
10 Mar16:32    i    +- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1Ross Finlayson
11 Mar17:49    i    `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2Tristan Wibberley
11 Mar22:31    i     `- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26    `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics5Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26     `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics4Tristan Wibberley
8 Mar 26      `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics3Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26       `* Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics2Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26        `- Re: Replacing the foundations of math, logic, computation and linguistics1Ross Finlayson
14 Mar22:31 o Re: energy and mass1Adiel Ungaretti
12 Mar17:37 o Re: energy and mass1Isais Kitamura
12 Mar13:36 o Re: energy and mass1Larry Gulyás
3 Mar 26 * Re: Black hole7Micheal Babadjanov
8 Mar 26 `* Re: Black hole6Tristan Wibberley
8 Mar 26  +- Re: Black hole1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Mar 26  `* Re: Black hole4Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
11 Mar12:38   `* Re: Black hole3Benton Mersinias
11 Mar21:12    `* Re: Black hole2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
11 Mar23:05     `- Re: Black hole1Thimber Tsukamoto
11 Mar11:04 o Re: "seems" like a minute1Palmer Kefalas
5 Mar 26 * The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations59olcott
5 Mar 26 +- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Mild Shock
5 Mar 26 +* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations6Ross Finlayson
5 Mar 26 i+- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Ross Finlayson
5 Mar 26 i`* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations4Tristan Wibberley
6 Mar 26 i `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations3Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26 i  `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2Tristan Wibberley
7 Mar 26 i   `- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Ross Finlayson
6 Mar 26 +* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations38Mikko
6 Mar 26 i+* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations30olcott
6 Mar 26 ii+* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations3olcott
6 Mar 26 iii`* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2Ross Finlayson
6 Mar 26 iii `- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1olcott
7 Mar 26 ii+* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations4Tristan Wibberley
7 Mar 26 iii+* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2olcott
7 Mar 26 iiii`- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26 iii`- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26 ii`* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations22Mikko
7 Mar 26 ii +* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations13olcott
7 Mar 26 ii i+* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2Tristan Wibberley
7 Mar 26 ii ii`- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1olcott
8 Mar 26 ii i`* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations10Mikko
8 Mar 26 ii i `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations9olcott
9 Mar08:46 ii i  `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations8Mikko
9 Mar13:34 ii i   +* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2olcott
10 Mar09:33 ii i   i`- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Mikko
9 Mar13:42 ii i   `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations5olcott
10 Mar13:03 ii i    `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations4Tristan Wibberley
10 Mar14:45 ii i     `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations3olcott
10 Mar17:43 ii i      +- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Ross Finlayson
10 Mar18:41 ii i      `- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1olcott
7 Mar 26 ii `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations8Tristan Wibberley
7 Mar 26 ii  `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations7olcott
9 Mar10:43 ii   `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations6Tristan Wibberley
9 Mar13:48 ii    +* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2olcott
10 Mar14:07 ii    i`- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Tristan Wibberley
9 Mar20:34 ii    +* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2Ross Finlayson
10 Mar06:15 ii    i`- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Ross Finlayson
10 Mar12:57 ii    `- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Tristan Wibberley
6 Mar 26 i`* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations7Ross Finlayson
6 Mar 26 i `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations6Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26 i  +* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2Tristan Wibberley
8 Mar 26 i  i`- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26 i  `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations3olcott
8 Mar 26 i   `* Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations2Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26 i    `- Re: The proper way to use LLMs to aid primary research into foundations1olcott
7 Mar 26 `* Don Knuth on the superb capability of Claude Opus 4.613olcott
7 Mar 26  `* Re: Don Knuth on the superb capability of Claude Opus 4.612Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26   `* Re: Don Knuth on the superb capability of Claude Opus 4.611Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 26    `* Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728 (Re: Don Knuth on the superb capability of Claude Opus 4.6)10Mild Shock
7 Mar 26     `* Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728)9Mild Shock
8 Mar 26      +* Only, three decades in software engineering? (Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here)6Mild Shock
8 Mar 26      i`* Re: Only, three decades in software engineering? (Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here)5Mild Shock
8 Mar 26      i `* Amazing Visual Perception, even for ASCII Input [GPT 5.3] (Re: Only, three decades in software engineering?)4Mild Shock
8 Mar 26      i  `* Re: Amazing Visual Perception, even for ASCII Input [GPT 5.3] (Re: Only, three decades in software engineering?)3Tristan Wibberley
8 Mar 26      i   `* Re: Amazing Visual Perception, even for ASCII Input [GPT 5.3] (Re: Only, three decades in software engineering?)2Ross Finlayson
8 Mar 26      i    `- Visual Perception helps reading Matrices, Fractions, etc.. (Was: Amazing Visual Perception, even for ASCII Input)1Mild Shock
9 Mar11:24      `* Biobrain cannot digest "Artificial" in AI (Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here)2Mild Shock
10 Mar13:09       `- Re: Biobrain cannot digest "Artificial" in AI (Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here)1Tristan Wibberley
7 Mar 26 * Re: What time is it?2Maciej Woźniak
7 Mar 26 `- Re: What time is it?1Maciej Woźniak
7 Mar 26 o Re: What time is it?1Maciej Woźniak
7 Mar 26 o Re: What time is it?1Maciej Woźniak
6 Mar 26 * Re: Geo-Strategy #101: Printing Bitcoin (Re: Will Jesus Christ return before 2027?)4Emmet Badaev
6 Mar 26 `* Re: Geo-Strategy #101: Printing Bitcoin (Re: Will Jesus Christ return before 2027?)3Ross Finlayson
6 Mar 26  `* Re: Geo-Strategy #101: Printing Bitcoin (Re: Will Jesus Christ return before 2027?)2Lucilo Nakamura
6 Mar 26   `- Re: Geo-Strategy #101: Printing Bitcoin (Re: Will Jesus Christ return before 2027?)1Ross Finlayson
6 Mar 26 o Re: What time is it?1Boris Bazanov
6 Mar 26 o Re: What time is it?1Jerbel Winogrodzki
27 Feb 26 * LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))11Mild Shock
27 Feb 26 +* Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))8Ross Finlayson
27 Feb 26 i+* Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))6Beauford Barzetti
27 Feb 26 ii`* Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))5Ross Finlayson
27 Feb 26 ii `* Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))4Marcello Fernández
28 Feb 26 ii  `* Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))3Ross Finlayson
28 Feb 26 ii   `* Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))2Levy Stamatas
28 Feb 26 ii    `- Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))1Ross Finlayson
5 Mar 26 i`- Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover] (Re: Is Causal AI simply ReLU (Geoffrey E. Hinton 2010))1Ross Finlayson
28 Feb 26 +- Original Subject established by Chinese Scientists [Extenics] (Was: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover])1Mild Shock
6 Mar 26 `- Odysseus PTSD: Does Function need Consistency? (Re: LRM moving from FOM to TCS [Lean Prover])1Mild Shock
5 Mar 26 o Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-standard)1Ross Finlayson
3 Mar 26 * Re: Black hole12Vittorio Dubanowski
3 Mar 26 +* Re: Black hole7Richard Hachel
4 Mar 26 i`* Re: Black hole6Python
4 Mar 26 i +* Re: Black hole4Maciej Woźniak
4 Mar 26 i i`* Re: Black hole3Python
4 Mar 26 i i +- Re: Black hole1Ross Finlayson
4 Mar 26 i i `- Re: Black hole1Python
4 Mar 26 i `- Re: Black hole1Wenceslao Vassilikos
4 Mar 26 `* Re: Black hole4Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
4 Mar 26  +- Re: Black hole1Troy Vassilopulos
4 Mar 26  `* Re: Black hole2Wilson Tatenaka
5 Mar 26   `- Re: Black hole1Ross Finlayson
23 Feb 26 * Re: Cardinalities of sets17WM
23 Feb 26 `* Re: Cardinalities of sets16Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
24 Feb 26  `* Re: Cardinalities of sets15wm
25 Feb 26   `* Re: Cardinalities of sets14Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
25 Feb 26    `* Re: Cardinalities of sets13WM
26 Feb 26     `* Re: Cardinalities of sets12Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
26 Feb 26      +- Re: Cardinalities of sets1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 26      `* Re: Cardinalities of sets10WM
26 Feb 26       `* Re: Cardinalities of sets9Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
27 Feb 26        +- Re: Cardinalities of sets1Ross Finlayson
27 Feb 26        `* Re: Cardinalities of sets7WM
28 Feb 26         `* Re: Cardinalities of sets6Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
28 Feb 26          +* Re: Cardinalities of sets4Ross Finlayson
28 Feb 26          i+- Re: Cardinalities of sets1Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26          i`* Re: Cardinalities of sets2Ross Finlayson
4 Mar 26          i `- Re: Cardinalities of sets1Ross Finlayson
28 Feb 26          `- Re: Cardinalities of sets1WM
4 Mar 26 o Re: AI solves probl;em Knuth was/is working on!1Mild Shock
3 Mar 26 * Re: Black hole2Marlon Pantelakos
3 Mar 26 `- Re: Black hole1Richard Hachel
2 Mar 26 o Re: UTC (was: Lies of relativistic scum have short legs)1Wellington Kalakos
1 Mar 26 * Re: OK!.. It's On! :-)3Lindsay Takamura
2 Mar 26 `* Re: OK!.. It's On! :-)2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
2 Mar 26  `- Re: OK!.. It's On! :-)1Erich Babenyshev
1 Mar 26 * Re: energy and mass3Taylor Mészáros
2 Mar 26 `* Re: energy and mass2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
2 Mar 26  `- Re: energy and mass1Winford Balabolkin
1 Mar 26 * Re: energy and mass2Ross Finlayson
2 Mar 26 `- Re: energy and mass1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
2 Mar 26 o Re: Relearning the Calculus1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
1 Mar 26 o Re: Lies of relativistic scum have short legs1Barbaro Dovlatov
25 Feb 26 * Re: energy and mass7Esequiel Stamatelos
26 Feb 26 `* Re: energy and mass6Emette Totolos
26 Feb 26  +* Re: energy and mass3Ross Finlayson
27 Feb 26  i`* Re: energy and mass2Keelyn Imagawa
27 Feb 26  i `- Re: energy and mass1Chadwick Katsukawa

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal