sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Mar 25 * Re: USA is deeply wrecked (Was: yeah, only in your dreams [dead cat bounce])7Physfitfreak
22 Mar 25 `* Re: USA is deeply wrecked6Bertitaylor
22 Mar 25  `* Re: USA is deeply wrecked5Physfitfreak
31 Mar08:40   `* Re: USA is deeply wrecked4Bertitaylor
31 Mar16:58    `* Re: USA is deeply wrecked3vallor
1 Apr05:14     `* Re: USA is deeply wrecked2Bertitaylor
3 Apr02:22      `- [OT] Linux on Windows (was: Re: USA is deeply wrecked)1vallor
3 Apr00:44 * Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)3Physfitfreak
3 Apr00:51 +- Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Apr01:50 `- Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)1Physfitfreak
3 Apr01:05 o Malvinas are Argentinians since ever. Einstein supported UK and Falklands1rhertz
31 Mar21:40 * Muon paradox48LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar22:09 +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar22:28 +* Re: Muon paradox21LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar22:54 i`* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr02:02 i `* Re: Muon paradox19Richard Hachel
1 Apr04:08 i  +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr05:01 i  +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr18:49 i  i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:01 i  i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr11:35 i  `* Re: Muon paradox14guido wugi
1 Apr11:48 i   +* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
1 Apr18:38 i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:24 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:31 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr16:38 i   `* Re: Muon paradox9LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:26 i    `* Re: Muon paradox8Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:41 i     +* Re: Muon paradox3Ross Finlayson
1 Apr20:24 i     i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:56 i     i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr20:12 i     `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr08:45 i      `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr10:13 i       +- Re: Muon paradox1Rubin Yablokov
2 Apr17:45 i       `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr18:42 +* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:38 i`* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr20:15 i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:24 i `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr10:45 i  `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr12:33 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
2 Apr18:46 i   `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr18:56 +* Re: Muon paradox15Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:17 i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr19:44 i+* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:54 ii+* Re: Muon paradox2Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr22:26 iii`- Re: Muon paradox1Edilberto Gayazov
1 Apr20:19 ii+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:42 ii`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr09:21 ii `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr20:06 i+* Re: Muon paradox6LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr11:00 ii`* Re: Muon paradox5Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr18:58 ii +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr20:32 ii +* Re: Muon paradox2Aether Regained
2 Apr22:33 ii i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr22:33 ii `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:02 i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr22:08 `* Re: Muon paradox3Kent Bazhukov
1 Apr22:21  `* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr23:01   `- Re: Muon paradox1Lane Babenkov
5 Mar 25 * Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)43Physfitfreak
5 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Bertietaylor
10 Mar 25 i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1bertitaylor
5 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1vallor
9 Mar 25 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)37Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Jim Pennino
11 Mar 25  i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9%
12 Mar 25  i i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i ii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
12 Mar 25  i i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Jim Pennino
12 Mar 25  i i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25  i i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4%
13 Mar 25  i i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25  i i    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25  i i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25  i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25  i  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
14 Mar 25  i  `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)20Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
28 Mar23:55   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)12Physfitfreak
29 Mar01:24    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
30 Mar19:24    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Physfitfreak
30 Mar21:04     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
30 Mar21:12      +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr15:51      i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr17:39      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
2 Apr00:48       +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
2 Apr20:50       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
2 Apr20:54        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
2 Apr21:07         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
2 Apr21:32          `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
29 Mar01:50 * The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.18rhertz
29 Mar01:53 +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.2rhertz
29 Mar01:55 i`- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
29 Mar02:52 +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.3Ross Finlayson
30 Mar10:17 i`* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.2Ross Finlayson
30 Mar16:10 i `- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
29 Mar14:25 +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
30 Mar09:28 +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1bertitaylor
30 Mar09:35 +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1J. J. Lodder
30 Mar16:37 +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.8gharnagel
30 Mar17:55 i`* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.7rhertz
31 Mar00:53 i +* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.2gharnagel
31 Mar02:35 i i`- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1Ross Finlayson
31 Mar07:05 i +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1Thomas Heger
1 Apr20:18 i `* Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.3Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr23:03 i  +- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
1 Apr23:05 i  `- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1rhertz
2 Apr20:57 `- Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.1Aether Regained
2 Apr17:20 * Re: How? ? ?7Elpidio Babadjan
2 Apr17:56 +* Re: How? ? ?2Python
2 Apr19:09 i`- Re: How? ? ?1Torre Turupanov
2 Apr18:16 `* Re: How? ? ?4Richard Hachel
2 Apr19:06  `* Re: How? ? ?3Astor Holopov
2 Apr19:53   `* Re: How? ? ?2Richard Hachel
2 Apr19:59    `- Re: How? ? ?1Ilia Bakhvalov
31 Mar21:44 * Albert in Relativityland6LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr19:54 `* Re: Albert in Relativityland5Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr19:57  +- Re: Albert in Relativityland1Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr20:28  `* Re: Albert in Relativityland3LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr10:13   `* Re: Albert in Relativityland2Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr19:25    `- Re: Albert in Relativityland1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr07:51 o Re: Muon's local time1Thomas Heger
25 Feb 25 * Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)12Physfitfreak
1 Mar 25 +- Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)1Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 `* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)10Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  `* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)9Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   `* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)8Physfitfreak
23 Mar 25    +- Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)1Physfitfreak
29 Mar21:28    `* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)6Physfitfreak
30 Mar01:09     +* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)4Physfitfreak
30 Mar19:44     i`* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)3Physfitfreak
2 Apr01:52     i `* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)2Physfitfreak
2 Apr02:23     i  `- Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)1Physfitfreak
30 Mar08:04     `- Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)1Thomas Heger
31 Mar04:51 o Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Physfitfreak
25 Mar 25 * The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)27Physfitfreak
25 Mar 25 +- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 i `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25 +* You didn't write this text (Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-))2Mild Shock
26 Mar 25 i`- Re: You didn't write this text (Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-))1Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Jim Burns
26 Mar 25 i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)13Physfitfreak
26 Mar 25 i+- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
28 Mar23:30 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)11Physfitfreak
28 Mar23:42 i +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3x
29 Mar02:53 i i+- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
29 Mar09:42 i i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Fransico Dudorov
29 Mar02:33 i `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)7Ross Finlayson
29 Mar06:20 i  `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)6Physfitfreak
29 Mar16:24 i   +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)4Ross Finlayson
29 Mar18:09 i   i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Physfitfreak
29 Mar18:49 i   i `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
29 Mar19:31 i   i  `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
29 Mar16:27 i   `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
27 Mar07:14 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3x
27 Mar18:12 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
28 Mar05:29 i `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
30 Mar17:46 `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Physfitfreak
30 Mar17:58  `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
15 Mar 25 * Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.62rhertz
15 Mar 25 +* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.6gharnagel
15 Mar 25 i+* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.2rhertz
16 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1J. J. Lodder
15 Mar 25 i`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.3Maciej Wozniak
16 Mar 25 i `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.2rhertz
16 Mar 25 i  `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1gharnagel
16 Mar 25 +* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.54rhertz
16 Mar 25 i+- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Mar 25 i+* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.5LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.4Ross Finlayson
18 Mar 25 ii `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.3Ross Finlayson
19 Mar 25 ii  `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.2Ross Finlayson
30 Mar10:21 ii   `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Ross Finlayson
17 Mar 25 i`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.47Paul.B.Andersen
18 Mar 25 i `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.46rhertz
18 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.45Paul.B.Andersen
18 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.44rhertz
18 Mar 25 i    `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.43rhertz
18 Mar 25 i     +* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.41gharnagel
18 Mar 25 i     i`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.40rhertz
18 Mar 25 i     i `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.39gharnagel
19 Mar 25 i     i  +* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.37rhertz
19 Mar 25 i     i  i+* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.4gharnagel
19 Mar 25 i     i  ii+- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
19 Mar 25 i     i  ii`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.2rhertz
19 Mar 25 i     i  ii `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1gharnagel
19 Mar 25 i     i  i+* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.31Paul.B.Andersen
19 Mar 25 i     i  ii+* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.27rhertz
20 Mar 25 i     i  iii+- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1gharnagel
20 Mar 25 i     i  iii`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.25Paul.B.Andersen
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii +* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.2Python
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii i`- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii +* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.21rhertz
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii i+* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.4gharnagel
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii ii`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.3rhertz
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii ii `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.2gharnagel
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii ii  `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii i`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.16Paul.B.Andersen
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii i `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.15rhertz
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  +* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.9rhertz
22 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  i+- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
22 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  i`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.7Paul.B.Andersen
22 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  i `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.6rhertz
23 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  i  `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.5rhertz
23 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  i   `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.4rhertz
24 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  i    `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.3Paul.B.Andersen
24 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  i     `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.2rhertz
24 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  i      `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Codey Stamatelos Kang
22 Mar 25 i     i  iii i  `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.5Paul.B.Andersen
22 Mar 25 i     i  iii i   `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.4rhertz
23 Mar 25 i     i  iii i    `* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.3Paul.B.Andersen
24 Mar 25 i     i  iii i     +- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1rhertz
24 Mar 25 i     i  iii i     `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
21 Mar 25 i     i  iii `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
19 Mar 25 i     i  ii+- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
20 Mar 25 i     i  ii`* Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.2J. J. Lodder
20 Mar 25 i     i  ii `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
19 Mar 25 i     i  i`- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Paul.B.Andersen
19 Mar 25 i     i  `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Maciej Wozniak
18 Mar 25 i     `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Mar 25 `- Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.1rhertz
20 Mar 25 * Modern cosmology's crises22Ross Finlayson
20 Mar 25 +* Re: Modern cosmology's crises18Ross Finlayson
21 Mar 25 i`* Re: Modern cosmology's crises17Ross Finlayson
22 Mar 25 i `* Re: Modern cosmology's crises16Ross Finlayson
22 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Modern cosmology's crises15Physfitfreak
22 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Modern cosmology's crises6x
22 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: Modern cosmology's crises5%
22 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: Modern cosmology's crises4x
23 Mar 25 i   i  +- Re: Modern cosmology's crises1Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25 i   i  `* Re: Modern cosmology's crises2%
23 Mar 25 i   i   `- Re: Modern cosmology's crises1x
22 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Modern cosmology's crises8Bertitaylor
23 Mar 25 i    `* Re: Modern cosmology's crises7Chris Ahlstrom
23 Mar 25 i     `* Re: Modern cosmology's crises6Johnny LaRue

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal