sci.physics.relativity
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
6 Jul
05:27
Re: Positrons
7
Bertietaylor
7 Jul
19:40
Re: Positrons
6
Paul.B.Andersen
7 Jul
19:53
Re: Positrons
1
Athel Cornish-Bowden
7 Jul
22:20
Re: Positrons
1
Maciej Woźniak
7 Jul
23:02
Re: Positrons
3
Stefan Ram
8 Jul
13:57
Re: Positrons
2
Paul.B.Andersen
8 Jul
15:17
Re: Positrons
1
Stefan Ram
6 Jul
06:34
Dr. Cluster...
12
Chris M. Thomasson
6 Jul
06:47
Re: Dr. Cluster...
1
Chris M. Thomasson
6 Jul
10:36
Re: Dr. Cluster...
10
Nolan Kouropoulos
6 Jul
23:10
Re: Dr. Cluster...
9
Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul
12:59
Re: Dr. Cluster...
8
Jimmy Munaev
7 Jul
20:21
Re: Dr. Cluster...
6
Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul
21:19
Re: Dr. Cluster...
5
Patricio Bekhoev
7 Jul
21:40
Re: Dr. Cluster...
4
Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul
21:51
Re: Dr. Cluster...
3
Stanton Takeshita
8 Jul
01:41
Re: Dr. Cluster...
2
Chris M. Thomasson
8 Jul
11:47
Re: Dr. Cluster...
1
Orlirio Mukusev
7 Jul
20:21
Re: Dr. Cluster...
1
Chris M. Thomasson
8 Jul
09:19
"Physical time" is a delusion
1
Maciej Woźniak
4 Jul
20:46
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
7
Aether Regained
4 Jul
22:41
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
6
Bertitaylor
4 Jul
23:19
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
1
Jim Pennino
5 Jul
20:32
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
4
Aether Regained
5 Jul
20:44
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
3
Aether Regained
6 Jul
01:02
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
2
Antony Paraskos
8 Jul
08:32
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
1
Thomas Heger
27 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
21
Lucus Shalabanov
28 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
20
Bertitaylor
28 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
19
Oleg Tzeboev
2 Jul
01:03
Re: The Apollo moon landings
18
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
19:01
Re: The Apollo moon landings
17
Tyller Maksimchikov
2 Jul
23:06
Re: The Apollo moon landings
16
Bertitaylor
3 Jul
20:09
Re: The Apollo moon landings
15
Luther Makhmutov
3 Jul
22:28
Re: The Apollo moon landings
14
Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jul
00:11
Re: The Apollo moon landings
13
Bertitaylor
4 Jul
19:55
Re: The Apollo moon landings
2
Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jul
22:32
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Bertitaylor
4 Jul
22:31
Re: The Apollo moon landings
10
Anderw Bakadorov
4 Jul
23:02
Re: The Apollo moon landings
9
Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jul
23:05
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jul
11:53
Re: The Apollo moon landings
7
Vince Babakulov
5 Jul
12:50
Re: The Apollo moon landings
6
Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul
13:13
Re: The Apollo moon landings
5
Cesario Lokhanov
7 Jul
20:22
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul
20:39
Re: The Apollo moon landings
3
Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jul
21:33
Re: The Apollo moon landings
2
Pat Ruzaev
7 Jul
21:42
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jul
23:38
ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?
5
George Hammond
6 Jul
00:19
Re: ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?
3
Sean Beizerov
6 Jul
03:59
Re: ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?
2
George Hammond
6 Jul
08:35
Re: ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?
1
Fransisco Méndez
6 Jul
23:22
Re: ARE PHANTOM LIMBS PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH ?
1
Chris M. Thomasson
30 Jun 25
Bertietaylor 's formula
34
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
6
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
4
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
01:45
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
3
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
02:39
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
2
Python
2 Jul
03:21
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
9
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
7
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
3
Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
2
Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
3
Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
2
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
10:05
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
18
Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
17
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
15
Paul.B.Andersen
30 Jun 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
8
guido wugi
1 Jul
20:28
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
7
Paul.B.Andersen
1 Jul
21:48
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
guido wugi
1 Jul
22:35
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
5
Chris M. Thomasson
2 Jul
03:24
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
3
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
03:36
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
2
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
04:45
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Jim Pennino
5 Jul
19:34
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Deangelo Kalabukhov
1 Jul 25
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Jim Pennino
1 Jul
21:35
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
00:55
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
00:47
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
3
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
01:42
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
2
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
03:11
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
1
Jim Pennino
5 Jul
16:27
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Fonzie Mocharov
7 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
11
Jim Pennino
8 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Jonny Veselov
8 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
9
Jim Pennino
8 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
7
Powell Speech-language pathologists Ban
9 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
6
rhertz
9 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
2
Thomas Heger
10 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Bertitaylor
14 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
3
LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
2
Thomas Heger
5 Jul
11:25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Bertietaylor
10 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Jim Pennino
25 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
40
Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
39
bertitaylor
26 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
37
Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Lon Mahankov
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
34
Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
16
Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
14
Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
13
Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
7
Chris M. Thomasson
28 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
6
Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
5
Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
4
Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
3
Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
2
Bertitaylor
4 Jul
23:19
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
2
Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
3
Jim Pennino
28 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
2
Bertitaylor
28 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
16
Paul.B.Andersen
27 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Dekota Hamaev
29 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Jim Pennino
29 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Martino Krakowski
29 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Kerwin Baklanov
1 Jul 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
3
Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
2
Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
18:20
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
3
Paul.B.Andersen
2 Jul
18:46
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Maciej Woźniak
3 Jul
09:43
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Paul.B.Andersen
2 Jul
19:34
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jul
23:00
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Truman Agamov
3 Jul
15:06
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
1
Bertitaylor
4 Jul
22:54
Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from 2nd law
1
Orazio Vakulovsky
4 Jul
14:08
Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
1
Jim Pennino
9 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
6
Jim Pennino
10 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
4
Jim Pennino
10 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
3
Jim Pennino
10 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Yanko Habov
4 Jul
04:09
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Bertitaylor
11 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Shay Bagaev
28 Jun 25
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
10
Maciej Woźniak
28 Jun 25
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
2
Python
29 Jun 25
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
1
Maciej Woźniak
30 Jun 25
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
7
Maciej Woźniak
1 Jul
22:19
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
6
Maciej Woźniak
2 Jul
03:13
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
1
Python
2 Jul
22:08
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
4
Python
3 Jul
08:43
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
3
Python
3 Jul
20:54
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
2
Python
3 Jul
23:53
Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
1
Python
21 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
18
anthk
21 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
16
Stefan Ram
22 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
15
Jan Panteltje
24 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
14
Jan Panteltje
25 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
13
Jan Panteltje
26 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
12
Jan Panteltje
27 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
11
Jan Panteltje
28 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
10
Jan Panteltje
2 Jul
07:41
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
1
Jan Panteltje
2 Jul
20:03
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
8
squalk
2 Jul
21:21
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
3
squalk
2 Jul
23:30
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
1
Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jul
19:06
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
1
Thomas Heger
3 Jul
09:24
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
1
Jan Panteltje
3 Jul
09:37
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
1
Jan Panteltje
3 Jul
19:01
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
1
Thomas Heger
3 Jul
19:04
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
1
Thomas Heger
21 Jun 25
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware?
1
Chris M. Thomasson
15 Jun 25
The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
16
LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
9
J. J. Lodder
15 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
1
LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
1
LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
1
LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
4
LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
3
Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
1
Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
1
LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
3
Mikko
27 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jul
10:44
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
1
Mikko
19 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
3
Richard Hachel
20 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
2
Mikko
20 Jun 25
Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
1
Jonatan Babanov
2 Jul
03:33
The cause of gravity and unification of forces
11
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
04:51
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
1
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
07:32
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
8
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
14:41
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
7
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
22:55
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
6
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
23:09
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
2
Python
3 Jul
01:25
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
1
Bertitaylor
2 Jul
23:11
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
3
Jim Pennino
3 Jul
01:22
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
2
Bertitaylor
3 Jul
02:36
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
1
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
17:08
Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces
1
David Canzi
23 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
6
Jim Pennino
24 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
5
bertietaylor
24 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
4
Jim Pennino
25 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
3
Bertitaylor
25 Jun 25
Re: The Apollo moon landings
2
Jim Pennino
2 Jul
23:07
Re: The Apollo moon landings
1
Bertitaylor
19 Jun 25
The first postulate is a truism.
55
LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
53
Mikko
20 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
33
LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
32
Mikko
21 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
9
LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
5
Python
22 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Bertitaylor
22 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Maciej Woźniak
23 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Python
22 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
3
Mikko
23 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Mikko
22 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Jerald Warszawski
22 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Walid Paradjanov
23 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
4
LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Mikko
23 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Mikko
23 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
16
LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Mikko
27 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
14
Thomas Heger
27 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
13
Mikko
28 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
12
Thomas Heger
28 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
10
Athel Cornish-Bowden
29 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
8
Thomas Heger
29 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
7
Athel Cornish-Bowden
30 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
6
Thomas Heger
30 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
5
Athel Cornish-Bowden
30 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
2
Julio Di Egidio
30 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Python
1 Jul 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Thomas Heger
1 Jul 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Mikko
20 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
6
LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
5
Mikko
21 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Mikko
23 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25
Re: The first postulate is a truism.
1
Mikko
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal