sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567
Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jul08:31 * The purpose of science20Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul17:00 +* Re: The purpose of science12gharnagel
3 Jul17:14 i+* Re: The purpose of science9Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul19:21 ii`* Re: The purpose of science8gharnagel
3 Jul20:20 ii +* Re: The purpose of science6gharnagel
3 Jul20:45 ii i+- Re: The purpose of science1Bernabe Baráth Lim
3 Jul22:08 ii i`* Re: The purpose of science4Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul01:12 ii i `* Re: The purpose of science3gharnagel
4 Jul05:28 ii i  `* Re: The purpose of science2Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul18:25 ii i   `- Re: The purpose of science1gharnagel
4 Jul00:42 ii `- Re: The purpose of science1Viahaul Turkov Yuan
4 Jul01:03 i`* Re: The purpose of science2Oliber Kefalas Pian
4 Jul04:02 i `- Re: The purpose of science1bertietaylor
4 Jul04:11 +- Re: The purpose of science1bertietaylor
6 Jul06:56 +* Re: The purpose of science5Thomas Heger
6 Jul07:11 i`* Re: The purpose of science4Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul07:57 i `* Re: The purpose of science3Thomas Heger
7 Jul10:15 i  `* Re: The purpose of science2Thomas Heger
7 Jul10:46 i   `- Re: The purpose of science1Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul07:10 `- Re: The purpose of science1Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 * The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.65LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 24 +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.32J. J. Lodder
21 Jun 24 i+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.5LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 ii`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.4Mikko
23 Jun 24 ii `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24 ii  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Mikko
23 Jun 24 ii   `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Joda Muromtsov Hui
21 Jun 24 i+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 ii`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.8J. J. Lodder
22 Jun 24 ii +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 ii +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.5Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 ii i+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 ii ii`- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24 ii i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24 ii i `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24 ii `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 i+- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 i+- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Darrell Wojewódzki
22 Jun 24 i+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.13LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 ii+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 iii`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 iii `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Mikko
22 Jun 24 ii`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.9J. J. Lodder
22 Jun 24 ii +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 ii +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 ii +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.4Athel Cornish-Bowden
23 Jun 24 ii i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24 ii i `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Mikko
23 Jun 24 ii i  `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24 ii `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24 i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24 i `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Mikko
22 Jun 24 +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.29Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.28LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24 i `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.27Tom Roberts
23 Jun 24 i  +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i  +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.23J. J. Lodder
25 Jun 24 i  i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.22Tom Roberts
25 Jun 24 i  i +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24 i  i +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Stuart Balboni
25 Jun 24 i  i `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.19Thomas Heger
25 Jun 24 i  i  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.18Ross Finlayson
26 Jun 24 i  i   +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24 i  i   `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.16J. J. Lodder
26 Jun 24 i  i    `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.15Ross Finlayson
4 Jul21:29 i  i     `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.14J. J. Lodder
4 Jul21:51 i  i      +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul22:04 i  i      +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.5Ross Finlayson
5 Jul21:00 i  i      i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.4J. J. Lodder
6 Jul02:53 i  i      i `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3Ross Finlayson
6 Jul21:56 i  i      i  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2J. J. Lodder
7 Jul04:27 i  i      i   `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
5 Jul11:01 i  i      `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.7Leolin Balakirev
6 Jul02:15 i  i       `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.6bertietaylor
6 Jul07:04 i  i        `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.5Thomas Heger
6 Jul13:41 i  i         +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3Richard Hachel
6 Jul21:37 i  i         i+- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
7 Jul10:19 i  i         i`- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Thomas Heger
6 Jul13:48 i  i         `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1bertietaylor
23 Jun 24 i  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24 i   `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Rollie Kokoris Lao
24 Jun 24 `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3JanPB
25 Jun 24  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Ross Finlayson
25 Jun 24   `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
28 Jun 24 * In relativity "s" is for "spin"25LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Jun 24 +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"5LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Jul13:28 i`* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"4bertietaylor
2 Jul14:33 i +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2Turkul Julidov Seto
3 Jul00:01 i i`- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1bertietaylor
7 Jul10:01 i `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Volney
29 Jun 24 +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Mayker Belgibaev
29 Jun 24 +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"17Mikko
29 Jun 24 i+- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
29 Jun 24 i`* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"15LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24 i +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Kennedy Barabás Hor
30 Jun11:43 i `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"13Mikko
30 Jun22:15 i  +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2J. J. Lodder
1 Jul07:21 i  i`- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
1 Jul00:44 i  `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jul22:10 i   `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"9J. J. Lodder
2 Jul01:49 i    `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"8Ross Finlayson
2 Jul07:36 i     +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
2 Jul09:35 i     `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"6J. J. Lodder
2 Jul22:22 i      `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"5Ross Finlayson
3 Jul07:02 i       +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul21:03 i       `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"3J. J. Lodder
3 Jul21:37 i        `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2Ross Finlayson
4 Jul18:16 i         `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24 * Spacetime34gharnagel
25 Jun 24 +* Re: Spacetime32Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24 i`* Re: Spacetime31gharnagel
27 Jun 24 i `* Re: Spacetime30Thomas Heger
27 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Spacetime29gharnagel
27 Jun 24 i   +- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
30 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Spacetime27Thomas Heger
30 Jun15:03 i    `* Re: Spacetime26gharnagel
4 Jul06:48 i     `* Re: Spacetime25Thomas Heger
4 Jul18:39 i      `* Re: Spacetime24gharnagel
4 Jul20:37 i       +* Re: Spacetime16Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul23:10 i       i`* Re: Spacetime15gharnagel
5 Jul15:01 i       i `* Re: Spacetime14gharnagel
5 Jul15:21 i       i  +* Re: Spacetime10Maciej Wozniak
5 Jul15:43 i       i  i`* Re: Spacetime9gharnagel
5 Jul18:37 i       i  i `* Re: Spacetime8gharnagel
6 Jul15:29 i       i  i  `* Re: Spacetime7gharnagel
6 Jul16:43 i       i  i   +* Re: Spacetime5Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul21:59 i       i  i   i`* Re: Spacetime4gharnagel
6 Jul23:33 i       i  i   i +- Re: Spacetime1Erich Missiakos Kong
6 Jul23:41 i       i  i   i `* Re: Spacetime2gharnagel
7 Jul07:42 i       i  i   i  `- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul18:17 i       i  i   `- Re: Spacetime1Rexx Hatukaev
5 Jul18:17 i       i  `* Re: Spacetime3Athel Cornish-Bowden
5 Jul18:25 i       i   +- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul00:53 i       i   `- Re: Spacetime1gharnagel
5 Jul06:53 i       `* Re: Spacetime7Thomas Heger
5 Jul07:06 i        +* Re: Spacetime3Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul07:15 i        i`* Re: Spacetime2Thomas Heger
6 Jul07:47 i        i `- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
5 Jul14:25 i        `* Re: Spacetime3gharnagel
5 Jul15:18 i         +- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul07:53 i         `- Re: Spacetime1Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24 `- Re: Spacetime1Harens Balahovski Bian
4 Jul15:30 * Langevin's paradox again10Richard Hachel
4 Jul17:27 +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Python
4 Jul19:04 i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Jul20:23 i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul23:19 i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
4 Jul20:27 `* Re: Langevin's paradox again5gharnagel
4 Jul21:06  +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul22:54  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Richard Hachel
4 Jul23:32   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2gharnagel
5 Jul00:14    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Emette Warszawski Wei
3 Jul12:35 * Schrödinger's E = ℎν heresy2Aether Regained
4 Jul04:05 `- Re: Schrödinger's E = ℎν heresy1bertietaylor
2 Jul15:57 * Re: Albert Einstein's movie2gharnagel
2 Jul16:38 `- Re: Albert Einstein's movie1Rhett Csontos Kang
2 Jul15:51 o Re: Albert Einstein's movie1bertietaylor
29 Jun 24 * REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:13LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24 +* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:3LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24 i`* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:2Ross Finlayson
30 Jun 24 i `- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Ross Finlayson
30 Jun11:45 `* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:9Mikko
30 Jun11:59  +- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Maciej Wozniak
30 Jun22:15  `* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:7J. J. Lodder
30 Jun23:42   +* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:5LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jul00:30   i+- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Clayburn Kalakos
1 Jul22:10   i+- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1J. J. Lodder
2 Jul01:34   i+- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Ross Finlayson
2 Jul09:35   i`- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1J. J. Lodder
1 Jul07:20   `- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Maciej Wozniak
24 May 24 * Location10neus
25 May 24 +- Re: Location1Mikko
26 May 24 +* Re: Location7Thomas Heger
27 May 24 i+* Re: Location3Thomas Heger
28 May 24 ii`* Re: Location2Thomas Heger
28 May 24 ii `- Re: Location1Dekota Bakaleinikov
27 May 24 i`* Re: Location3neus
28 May 24 i `* Re: Location2Maciej Wozniak
28 May 24 i  `- Re: Location1neus
30 Jun23:28 `- Re: Location1neus
15 Jun 24 * Re: Space and spacetime108Roeidi Hegedüs
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Space and spacetime86Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 i+* Re: Space and spacetime22Python
15 Jun 24 ii+* Re: Space and spacetime9Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 iii`* Re: Space and spacetime8Python
15 Jun 24 iii +- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 iii `* Re: Space and spacetime6Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 iii  +* Re: Space and spacetime4Python
15 Jun 24 iii  i`* Re: Space and spacetime3Richard Hachel
16 Jun 24 iii  i `* Re: Space and spacetime2Alejandro Ślązak Mei
16 Jun 24 iii  i  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Moebius
16 Jun 24 iii  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Kory Muksinov Mak
15 Jun 24 ii`* Re: Space and spacetime12Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 ii `* Re: Space and spacetime11Python
15 Jun 24 ii  +* Re: Space and spacetime9Python
16 Jun 24 ii  i`* Re: Space and spacetime8Maciej Wozniak
16 Jun 24 ii  i +- Re: Space and spacetime1Darin Stamatelos Zhai
16 Jun 24 ii  i `* Re: Space and spacetime6gharnagel
16 Jun 24 ii  i  +* Re: Space and spacetime2Osmel Pásztor Woo
22 Jun 24 ii  i  i`- Re: Space and spacetime1bertietaylor
16 Jun 24 ii  i  `* Re: Space and spacetime3Maciej Wozniak
17 Jun 24 ii  i   `* Re: Space and spacetime2gharnagel
17 Jun 24 ii  i    `- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Richard Hachel
16 Jun 24 i`* Re: Space and spacetime63JanPB
16 Jun 24 i +* Re: Space and spacetime61Richard Hachel
17 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Space and spacetime60Athel Cornish-Bowden
17 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Space and spacetime59Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Space and spacetime58gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i   `* Re: Space and spacetime56Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 i i    `* Re: Space and spacetime55Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i     `* Re: Space and spacetime54gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i      +* Re: Space and spacetime50Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i      i+- Re: Space and spacetime1Python
18 Jun 24 i i      i`* Re: Space and spacetime48gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i      i `* Re: Space and spacetime47gharnagel
19 Jun 24 i i      i  `* Re: Space and spacetime46Maciej Wozniak
19 Jun 24 i i      i   `* Re: Space and spacetime45gharnagel
19 Jun 24 i i      i    `* Re: Space and spacetime44Maciej Wozniak
19 Jun 24 i i      i     `* Re: Space and spacetime43gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i      `* Re: Space and spacetime42gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i       `* Re: Space and spacetime41gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i        `* Re: Space and spacetime40Maciej Wozniak
20 Jun 24 i i      i         `* Re: Space and spacetime39gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i          +* Re: Space and spacetime37Maciej Wozniak
20 Jun 24 i i      i          i`* Re: Space and spacetime36gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i          i +* Re: Space and spacetime34Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i i+* Re: Space and spacetime30gharnagel
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii`* Re: Space and spacetime29Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii +* Re: Space and spacetime27gharnagel
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i`* Re: Space and spacetime26Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i `* Re: Space and spacetime25gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  +* Re: Space and spacetime23Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i`* Re: Space and spacetime22gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i `* Re: Space and spacetime21Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i  `* Re: Space and spacetime20gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i   `* Re: Space and spacetime19Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i    `* Re: Space and spacetime18gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i     `* Re: Space and spacetime17Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i      `* Re: Space and spacetime16gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       +* Re: Space and spacetime14Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i`* Re: Space and spacetime13gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i +* Re: Space and spacetime11Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i`* Re: Space and spacetime10gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i `* Re: Space and spacetime9gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i  `* Re: Space and spacetime8Maciej Wozniak
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Hugo Madarász Hew

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal