sci.physics.relativity
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
3 Jul
08:31
The purpose of science
20
Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul
17:00
Re: The purpose of science
12
gharnagel
3 Jul
17:14
Re: The purpose of science
9
Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul
19:21
Re: The purpose of science
8
gharnagel
3 Jul
20:20
Re: The purpose of science
6
gharnagel
3 Jul
20:45
Re: The purpose of science
1
Bernabe Baráth Lim
3 Jul
22:08
Re: The purpose of science
4
Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul
01:12
Re: The purpose of science
3
gharnagel
4 Jul
05:28
Re: The purpose of science
2
Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul
18:25
Re: The purpose of science
1
gharnagel
4 Jul
00:42
Re: The purpose of science
1
Viahaul Turkov Yuan
4 Jul
01:03
Re: The purpose of science
2
Oliber Kefalas Pian
4 Jul
04:02
Re: The purpose of science
1
bertietaylor
4 Jul
04:11
Re: The purpose of science
1
bertietaylor
6 Jul
06:56
Re: The purpose of science
5
Thomas Heger
6 Jul
07:11
Re: The purpose of science
4
Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul
07:57
Re: The purpose of science
3
Thomas Heger
7 Jul
10:15
Re: The purpose of science
2
Thomas Heger
7 Jul
10:46
Re: The purpose of science
1
Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul
07:10
Re: The purpose of science
1
Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24
The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
65
LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
32
J. J. Lodder
21 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
5
LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
4
Mikko
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
3
LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
Mikko
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Joda Muromtsov Hui
21 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
9
LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
8
J. J. Lodder
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
5
Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Darrell Wojewódzki
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
13
LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
3
Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Mikko
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
9
J. J. Lodder
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
4
Athel Cornish-Bowden
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
3
J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
Mikko
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Mikko
22 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
29
Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
28
LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
27
Tom Roberts
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
23
J. J. Lodder
25 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
22
Tom Roberts
25 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Stuart Balboni
25 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
19
Thomas Heger
25 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
18
Ross Finlayson
26 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
16
J. J. Lodder
26 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
15
Ross Finlayson
4 Jul
21:29
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
14
J. J. Lodder
4 Jul
21:51
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul
22:04
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
5
Ross Finlayson
5 Jul
21:00
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
4
J. J. Lodder
6 Jul
02:53
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
3
Ross Finlayson
6 Jul
21:56
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
J. J. Lodder
7 Jul
04:27
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Ross Finlayson
5 Jul
11:01
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
7
Leolin Balakirev
6 Jul
02:15
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
6
bertietaylor
6 Jul
07:04
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
5
Thomas Heger
6 Jul
13:41
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
3
Richard Hachel
6 Jul
21:37
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Ross Finlayson
7 Jul
10:19
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Thomas Heger
6 Jul
13:48
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
bertietaylor
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Rollie Kokoris Lao
24 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
3
JanPB
25 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
2
Ross Finlayson
25 Jun 24
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
1
Ross Finlayson
28 Jun 24
In relativity "s" is for "spin"
25
LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Jun 24
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
5
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Jul
13:28
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
4
bertietaylor
2 Jul
14:33
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
2
Turkul Julidov Seto
3 Jul
00:01
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
bertietaylor
7 Jul
10:01
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Volney
29 Jun 24
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Mayker Belgibaev
29 Jun 24
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
17
Mikko
29 Jun 24
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Maciej Wozniak
29 Jun 24
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
15
LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Kennedy Barabás Hor
30 Jun
11:43
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
13
Mikko
30 Jun
22:15
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
2
J. J. Lodder
1 Jul
07:21
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Maciej Wozniak
1 Jul
00:44
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
10
LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jul
22:10
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
9
J. J. Lodder
2 Jul
01:49
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
8
Ross Finlayson
2 Jul
07:36
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Maciej Wozniak
2 Jul
09:35
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
6
J. J. Lodder
2 Jul
22:22
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
5
Ross Finlayson
3 Jul
07:02
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul
21:03
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
3
J. J. Lodder
3 Jul
21:37
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
2
Ross Finlayson
4 Jul
18:16
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24
Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
1
Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24
Spacetime
34
gharnagel
25 Jun 24
Re: Spacetime
32
Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24
Re: Spacetime
31
gharnagel
27 Jun 24
Re: Spacetime
30
Thomas Heger
27 Jun 24
Re: Spacetime
29
gharnagel
27 Jun 24
Re: Spacetime
1
Maciej Wozniak
30 Jun 24
Re: Spacetime
27
Thomas Heger
30 Jun
15:03
Re: Spacetime
26
gharnagel
4 Jul
06:48
Re: Spacetime
25
Thomas Heger
4 Jul
18:39
Re: Spacetime
24
gharnagel
4 Jul
20:37
Re: Spacetime
16
Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul
23:10
Re: Spacetime
15
gharnagel
5 Jul
15:01
Re: Spacetime
14
gharnagel
5 Jul
15:21
Re: Spacetime
10
Maciej Wozniak
5 Jul
15:43
Re: Spacetime
9
gharnagel
5 Jul
18:37
Re: Spacetime
8
gharnagel
6 Jul
15:29
Re: Spacetime
7
gharnagel
6 Jul
16:43
Re: Spacetime
5
Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul
21:59
Re: Spacetime
4
gharnagel
6 Jul
23:33
Re: Spacetime
1
Erich Missiakos Kong
6 Jul
23:41
Re: Spacetime
2
gharnagel
7 Jul
07:42
Re: Spacetime
1
Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul
18:17
Re: Spacetime
1
Rexx Hatukaev
5 Jul
18:17
Re: Spacetime
3
Athel Cornish-Bowden
5 Jul
18:25
Re: Spacetime
1
Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul
00:53
Re: Spacetime
1
gharnagel
5 Jul
06:53
Re: Spacetime
7
Thomas Heger
5 Jul
07:06
Re: Spacetime
3
Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul
07:15
Re: Spacetime
2
Thomas Heger
6 Jul
07:47
Re: Spacetime
1
Maciej Wozniak
5 Jul
14:25
Re: Spacetime
3
gharnagel
5 Jul
15:18
Re: Spacetime
1
Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul
07:53
Re: Spacetime
1
Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24
Re: Spacetime
1
Harens Balahovski Bian
4 Jul
15:30
Langevin's paradox again
10
Richard Hachel
4 Jul
17:27
Re: Langevin's paradox again
4
Python
4 Jul
19:04
Re: Langevin's paradox again
1
Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Jul
20:23
Re: Langevin's paradox again
2
Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul
23:19
Re: Langevin's paradox again
1
Richard Hachel
4 Jul
20:27
Re: Langevin's paradox again
5
gharnagel
4 Jul
21:06
Re: Langevin's paradox again
1
Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul
22:54
Re: Langevin's paradox again
3
Richard Hachel
4 Jul
23:32
Re: Langevin's paradox again
2
gharnagel
5 Jul
00:14
Re: Langevin's paradox again
1
Emette Warszawski Wei
3 Jul
12:35
Schrödinger's E = ℎν heresy
2
Aether Regained
4 Jul
04:05
Re: Schrödinger's E = ℎν heresy
1
bertietaylor
2 Jul
15:57
Re: Albert Einstein's movie
2
gharnagel
2 Jul
16:38
Re: Albert Einstein's movie
1
Rhett Csontos Kang
2 Jul
15:51
Re: Albert Einstein's movie
1
bertietaylor
29 Jun 24
REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
13
LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
3
LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
2
Ross Finlayson
30 Jun 24
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
1
Ross Finlayson
30 Jun
11:45
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
9
Mikko
30 Jun
11:59
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
1
Maciej Wozniak
30 Jun
22:15
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
7
J. J. Lodder
30 Jun
23:42
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
5
LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jul
00:30
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
1
Clayburn Kalakos
1 Jul
22:10
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
1
J. J. Lodder
2 Jul
01:34
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
1
Ross Finlayson
2 Jul
09:35
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
1
J. J. Lodder
1 Jul
07:20
Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
1
Maciej Wozniak
24 May 24
Location
10
neus
25 May 24
Re: Location
1
Mikko
26 May 24
Re: Location
7
Thomas Heger
27 May 24
Re: Location
3
Thomas Heger
28 May 24
Re: Location
2
Thomas Heger
28 May 24
Re: Location
1
Dekota Bakaleinikov
27 May 24
Re: Location
3
neus
28 May 24
Re: Location
2
Maciej Wozniak
28 May 24
Re: Location
1
neus
30 Jun
23:28
Re: Location
1
neus
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
108
Roeidi Hegedüs
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
86
Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
22
Python
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
9
Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
8
Python
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
6
Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
4
Python
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
3
Richard Hachel
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
2
Alejandro Ślązak Mei
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Moebius
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Kory Muksinov Mak
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
12
Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
11
Python
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
9
Python
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
8
Maciej Wozniak
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Darin Stamatelos Zhai
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
6
gharnagel
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
2
Osmel Pásztor Woo
22 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
bertietaylor
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
3
Maciej Wozniak
17 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
2
gharnagel
17 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Richard Hachel
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
63
JanPB
16 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
61
Richard Hachel
17 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
60
Athel Cornish-Bowden
17 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
59
Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
58
gharnagel
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
56
Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
55
Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
54
gharnagel
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
50
Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Python
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
48
gharnagel
18 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
47
gharnagel
19 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
46
Maciej Wozniak
19 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
45
gharnagel
19 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
44
Maciej Wozniak
19 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
43
gharnagel
20 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
42
gharnagel
20 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
41
gharnagel
20 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
40
Maciej Wozniak
20 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
39
gharnagel
20 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
37
Maciej Wozniak
20 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
36
gharnagel
20 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
34
Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
30
gharnagel
21 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
29
Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
27
gharnagel
21 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
26
Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
25
gharnagel
22 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
23
Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
22
gharnagel
22 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
21
Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
20
gharnagel
22 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
19
Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
18
gharnagel
22 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
17
Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
16
gharnagel
23 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
14
Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
13
gharnagel
23 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
11
Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
10
gharnagel
23 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
9
gharnagel
24 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
8
Maciej Wozniak
24 Jun 24
Re: Space and spacetime
1
Hugo Madarász Hew
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal