sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :12
Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Feb 26 * Re: energy and mass189Ross Finlayson
23 Feb 26 +* Re: energy and mass174J. J. Lodder
24 Feb 26 i`* Re: energy and mass173J. J. Lodder
24 Feb 26 i `* Re: energy and mass172Ross Finlayson
24 Feb 26 i  +- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
25 Feb 26 i  `* Re: energy and mass170Bill Sloman
25 Feb 26 i   +* Re: energy and mass168J. J. Lodder
25 Feb 26 i   i+- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
25 Feb 26 i   i+* Re: energy and mass2john larkin
26 Feb 26 i   ii`- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
26 Feb 26 i   i+* Re: energy and mass126Bill Sloman
26 Feb 26 i   ii+- Re: energy and mass1Maciej Woźniak
26 Feb 26 i   ii+* Re: energy and mass4Gerhard Hoffmann
26 Feb 26 i   iii`* Re: energy and mass3J. J. Lodder
26 Feb 26 i   iii `* Re: energy and mass2Gerhard Hoffmann
26 Feb 26 i   iii  `- Re: energy and mass1Domingo Totolos
26 Feb 26 i   ii+* Re: energy and mass119Ross Finlayson
26 Feb 26 i   iii+* Re: energy and mass57Maciej Woźniak
26 Feb 26 i   iiii`* Re: energy and mass56Ross Finlayson
26 Feb 26 i   iiii +* Re: energy and mass3Maciej Woźniak
26 Feb 26 i   iiii i`* Re: energy and mass2Maciej Woźniak
26 Feb 26 i   iiii i `- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
28 Feb 26 i   iiii `* Re: energy and mass52Thomas Heger
28 Feb 26 i   iiii  +* Re: energy and mass48Bill Sloman
1 Mar 26 i   iiii  i`* Re: energy and mass47Thomas Heger
1 Mar 26 i   iiii  i `* Re: energy and mass46Bill Sloman
3 Mar 26 i   iiii  i  `* Re: energy and mass45Thomas Heger
3 Mar 26 i   iiii  i   `* Re: energy and mass44Bill Sloman
5 Mar11:57 i   iiii  i    `* Re: energy and mass43Thomas Heger
5 Mar15:43 i   iiii  i     `* Re: energy and mass42Bill Sloman
5 Mar16:03 i   iiii  i      +* Re: energy and mass10Jeroen Belleman
5 Mar22:03 i   iiii  i      i`* Re: energy and mass9Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
6 Mar03:20 i   iiii  i      i `* Re: energy and mass8Ross Finlayson
6 Mar20:01 i   iiii  i      i  `* Re: energy and mass7john larkin
7 Mar06:48 i   iiii  i      i   `* Re: energy and mass6Bill Sloman
7 Mar06:56 i   iiii  i      i    `* Re: energy and mass5Ross Finlayson
7 Mar13:16 i   iiii  i      i     +* Re: energy and mass3john larkin
7 Mar14:31 i   iiii  i      i     i`* Re: energy and mass2Bill Sloman
7 Mar16:08 i   iiii  i      i     i `- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
7 Mar14:29 i   iiii  i      i     `- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
5 Mar17:42 i   iiii  i      +* Re: energy and mass5Ross Finlayson
5 Mar19:44 i   iiii  i      i+- Re: energy and mass1Don
5 Mar19:48 i   iiii  i      i+* Re: energy and mass2Don
5 Mar21:32 i   iiii  i      ii`- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
5 Mar19:57 i   iiii  i      i`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
8 Mar09:40 i   iiii  i      `* Re: energy and mass26Thomas Heger
8 Mar15:37 i   iiii  i       `* Re: energy and mass25Bill Sloman
10 Mar09:19 i   iiii  i        `* Re: energy and mass24Thomas Heger
10 Mar16:56 i   iiii  i         +* Re: energy and mass15Ross Finlayson
10 Mar17:13 i   iiii  i         i+* Re: energy and mass8john larkin
10 Mar17:21 i   iiii  i         ii+- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
10 Mar20:04 i   iiii  i         ii+* Re: energy and mass5Jeroen Belleman
10 Mar20:51 i   iiii  i         iii+* Re: energy and mass3john larkin
10 Mar20:55 i   iiii  i         iiii+- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
11 Mar05:00 i   iiii  i         iiii`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
11 Mar04:53 i   iiii  i         iii`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
11 Mar10:01 i   iiii  i         ii`- Re: energy and mass1Thomas Heger
10 Mar17:16 i   iiii  i         i+* Re: energy and mass5Ross Finlayson
10 Mar18:20 i   iiii  i         ii`* Re: energy and mass4Bill Sloman
10 Mar18:37 i   iiii  i         ii `* Re: energy and mass3Ross Finlayson
11 Mar05:32 i   iiii  i         ii  `* Re: energy and mass2Bill Sloman
11 Mar07:23 i   iiii  i         ii   `- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
11 Mar13:15 i   iiii  i         i`- Re: energy and mass1Paul B. Andersen
10 Mar17:01 i   iiii  i         `* Re: energy and mass8Bill Sloman
10 Mar21:45 i   iiii  i          +* Re: energy and mass3J. J. Lodder
11 Mar05:42 i   iiii  i          i`* Re: energy and mass2Bill Sloman
11 Mar11:20 i   iiii  i          i `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
11 Mar09:57 i   iiii  i          `* Re: energy and mass4Thomas Heger
11 Mar10:54 i   iiii  i           +* Re: energy and mass2Gerhard Hoffmann
11 Mar14:07 i   iiii  i           i`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
11 Mar14:06 i   iiii  i           `- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
28 Feb 26 i   iiii  +* Re: energy and mass2Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26 i   iiii  i`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
1 Mar 26 i   iiii  `- Re: energy and mass1Thomas Heger
28 Feb 26 i   iii`* Re: energy and mass61Thomas Heger
28 Feb 26 i   iii `* Re: energy and mass60Bill Sloman
1 Mar 26 i   iii  `* Re: energy and mass59Thomas Heger
1 Mar 26 i   iii   +* Re: energy and mass57Bill Sloman
3 Mar 26 i   iii   i`* Re: energy and mass56Thomas Heger
3 Mar 26 i   iii   i `* Re: energy and mass55Bill Sloman
3 Mar 26 i   iii   i  +* Re: energy and mass3Ross Finlayson
4 Mar 26 i   iii   i  i`* Re: energy and mass2Bill Sloman
7 Mar23:39 i   iii   i  i `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
6 Mar09:37 i   iii   i  `* Re: energy and mass51Thomas Heger
6 Mar14:36 i   iii   i   `* Re: energy and mass50Bill Sloman
7 Mar07:12 i   iii   i    +* Re: energy and mass47Bill Sloman
7 Mar15:59 i   iii   i    i`* Re: energy and mass46Ross Finlayson
8 Mar01:33 i   iii   i    i `* Re: energy and mass45Bill Sloman
8 Mar04:19 i   iii   i    i  `* Re: energy and mass44Ross Finlayson
8 Mar15:44 i   iii   i    i   `* Re: energy and mass43Bill Sloman
9 Mar02:52 i   iii   i    i    `* Re: energy and mass42Bill Sloman
9 Mar04:04 i   iii   i    i     +* Re: energy and mass39Ross Finlayson
9 Mar04:17 i   iii   i    i     i+* Re: energy and mass18Ross Finlayson
9 Mar14:09 i   iii   i    i     ii`* Re: energy and mass17Bill Sloman
9 Mar15:36 i   iii   i    i     ii +* Re: energy and mass14Ross Finlayson
9 Mar17:09 i   iii   i    i     ii i+* Re: energy and mass2Ross Finlayson
10 Mar04:29 i   iii   i    i     ii ii`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
10 Mar04:17 i   iii   i    i     ii i`* Re: energy and mass11Bill Sloman
10 Mar21:21 i   iii   i    i     ii i `* Re: energy and mass10J. J. Lodder
10 Mar23:57 i   iii   i    i     ii i  +* Re: energy and mass7Maciej Woźniak
11 Mar06:14 i   iii   i    i     ii i  i`* Re: energy and mass6Bill Sloman
11 Mar08:13 i   iii   i    i     ii i  i +* Re: energy and mass4Maciej Woźniak
11 Mar13:50 i   iii   i    i     ii i  i i+* Re: energy and mass2Paul B. Andersen
11 Mar14:39 i   iii   i    i     ii i  i ii`- Re: energy and mass1Maciej Woźniak
11 Mar14:24 i   iii   i    i     ii i  i i`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
11 Mar11:20 i   iii   i    i     ii i  i `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
11 Mar05:56 i   iii   i    i     ii i  `* Re: energy and mass2Bill Sloman
11 Mar11:20 i   iii   i    i     ii i   `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
9 Mar18:59 i   iii   i    i     ii `* Re: energy and mass2Ross Finlayson
9 Mar21:18 i   iii   i    i     ii  `- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
9 Mar13:59 i   iii   i    i     i`* Re: energy and mass20Bill Sloman
9 Mar15:32 i   iii   i    i     i `* Re: energy and mass19Ross Finlayson
9 Mar21:49 i   iii   i    i     i  +* Re: energy and mass17J. J. Lodder
9 Mar23:24 i   iii   i    i     i  i`* Re: energy and mass16Ross Finlayson
10 Mar05:37 i   iii   i    i     i  i +* Re: energy and mass14Bill Sloman
10 Mar06:07 i   iii   i    i     i  i i`* Re: energy and mass13Ross Finlayson
10 Mar06:58 i   iii   i    i     i  i i `* Re: energy and mass12Bill Sloman
10 Mar07:26 i   iii   i    i     i  i i  `* Re: energy and mass11Ross Finlayson
10 Mar17:36 i   iii   i    i     i  i i   +* Re: energy and mass3Bill Sloman
10 Mar18:13 i   iii   i    i     i  i i   i`* Re: energy and mass2Ross Finlayson
11 Mar06:51 i   iii   i    i     i  i i   i `- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
10 Mar18:33 i   iii   i    i     i  i i   `* Re: energy and mass7Bill Sloman
10 Mar18:45 i   iii   i    i     i  i i    +* Re: energy and mass5Ross Finlayson
11 Mar06:26 i   iii   i    i     i  i i    i`* Re: energy and mass4Bill Sloman
11 Mar08:19 i   iii   i    i     i  i i    i +* Re: energy and mass2Maciej Woźniak
11 Mar14:34 i   iii   i    i     i  i i    i i`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
11 Mar08:28 i   iii   i    i     i  i i    i `- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
10 Mar21:45 i   iii   i    i     i  i i    `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
10 Mar21:21 i   iii   i    i     i  i `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
10 Mar04:51 i   iii   i    i     i  `- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
11 Mar07:02 i   iii   i    i     `* Re: energy and mass2Bill Sloman
11 Mar11:20 i   iii   i    i      `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
8 Mar09:53 i   iii   i    `* Re: energy and mass2Thomas Heger
8 Mar16:07 i   iii   i     `- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
1 Mar 26 i   iii   `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
26 Feb 26 i   ii`- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
28 Feb 26 i   i`* Re: energy and mass38Don
28 Feb 26 i   i +* Re: energy and mass3Ross Finlayson
5 Mar17:54 i   i i`* Re: energy and mass2Ross Finlayson
5 Mar20:12 i   i i `- Re: energy and mass1Bill Sloman
28 Feb 26 i   i `* Re: energy and mass34Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
28 Feb 26 i   i  +* Re: energy and mass3Python
28 Feb 26 i   i  i+- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
28 Feb 26 i   i  i`- Re: energy and mass1Maciej Woźniak
28 Feb 26 i   i  +- Re: energy and mass1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
28 Feb 26 i   i  +* Re: energy and mass2Ross Finlayson
28 Feb 26 i   i  i`- Re: energy and mass1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
1 Mar 26 i   i  +* Re: energy and mass24Don
1 Mar 26 i   i  i+* Re: energy and mass22Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii`* Re: energy and mass21Don
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii +* Re: energy and mass19Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii i+* Re: energy and mass17Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii`* Re: energy and mass16Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii `* Re: energy and mass15Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii  +* Re: energy and mass7Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii  i+* Re: energy and mass3Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii  ii`* Re: energy and mass2Ross Finlayson
2 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii  ii `- Re: energy and mass1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
2 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii  i+- Re: energy and mass1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
2 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii  i`* Re: energy and mass2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
2 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii  i `- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii  `* Re: energy and mass7Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii   +* Re: energy and mass3Taylor Mészáros
2 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii   i`* Re: energy and mass2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
2 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii   i `- Re: energy and mass1Winford Balabolkin
2 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii   `* Re: energy and mass3Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
3 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii    `* Re: energy and mass2Thomas Heger
3 Mar 26 i   i  ii ii     `- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii i`- Re: energy and mass1Don
1 Mar 26 i   i  ii `- Re: energy and mass1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
1 Mar 26 i   i  i`- Re: energy and mass1Maciej Woźniak
1 Mar 26 i   i  +- Re: energy and mass1Thomas Heger
1 Mar 26 i   i  +- Re: energy and mass1Maciej Woźniak
3 Mar 26 i   i  `- Re: energy and mass1Thomas Heger
25 Feb 26 i   `- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
24 Feb 26 `* Re: energy and mass14Bill Sloman
24 Feb 26  +- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
24 Feb 26  `* Re: energy and mass12J. J. Lodder
24 Feb 26   `* Re: energy and mass11Bill Sloman
24 Feb 26    `* Re: energy and mass10J. J. Lodder
24 Feb 26     +* Re: energy and mass6Bill Sloman
24 Feb 26     i`* Re: energy and mass5J. J. Lodder
24 Feb 26     i +- Re: energy and mass1Ross Finlayson
27 Feb 26     i `* Re: energy and mass3Bill Sloman
27 Feb 26     i  `* Re: energy and mass2J. J. Lodder
27 Feb 26     i   `- Re: energy and mass1Jovany Márton
24 Feb 26     `* Re: energy and mass3Ross Finlayson
24 Feb 26      +- Re: energy and mass1Don
24 Feb 26      `- Re: energy and mass1J. J. Lodder
11 Mar13:14 o Re: "seems" like a minute1Richard Harnden
3 Mar 26 * Black hole27Richard Hachel
3 Mar 26 +* Re: Black hole6Micheal Babadjanov
8 Mar20:28 i`* Re: Black hole5Tristan Wibberley
8 Mar22:41 i +- Re: Black hole1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Mar01:32 i +- Re: Black hole1Stefan Ram
9 Mar02:06 i `* Re: Black hole2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
11 Mar12:38 i  `- Re: Black hole1Benton Mersinias
3 Mar 26 +* Re: Black hole6Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
3 Mar 26 i`* Re: Black hole5Richard Hachel
3 Mar 26 i +* Re: Black hole2Marlon Pantelakos
3 Mar 26 i i`- Re: Black hole1Richard Hachel
4 Mar 26 i `* Re: Black hole2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
4 Mar 26 i  `- Re: Black hole1Ross Finlayson
3 Mar 26 +- Re: Black hole1Maciej Woźniak
3 Mar 26 `* Re: Black hole13Vittorio Dubanowski
3 Mar 26  +* Re: Black hole7Richard Hachel
4 Mar17:49  i`* Re: Black hole6Python
4 Mar18:16  i +* Re: Black hole4Maciej Woźniak
4 Mar18:24  i i`* Re: Black hole3Python
4 Mar18:51  i i +- Re: Black hole1Ross Finlayson
4 Mar22:05  i i `- Re: Black hole1Python
4 Mar21:19  i `- Re: Black hole1Wenceslao Vassilikos
4 Mar 26  `* Re: Black hole5Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
4 Mar 26   +* Re: Black hole3Ross Finlayson
4 Mar21:47   i`* Re: Black hole2Wilson Tatenaka
5 Mar00:46   i `- Re: Black hole1Ross Finlayson
4 Mar21:39   `- Re: Black hole1Troy Vassilopulos
11 Mar11:04 o Re: "seems" like a minute1Palmer Kefalas
11 Mar07:49 o Re: The lies of relativistic scum have short legs1Maciej Woźniak
11 Mar01:08 * UTC second (was: The lies of relativistic scum have short legs)2Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
11 Mar07:30 `- Re: UTC second1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
10 Mar14:19 o Re: "seems" like a minute1Maciej Woźniak
9 Mar03:57 * If Michelson-Gale-Pearson can detect the tangential motion of Earth's surface why shouldn't Michelson-Morley apparatuses?6amirjf nin
9 Mar04:14 +- Re: If Michelson-Gale-Pearson can detect the tangential motion of Earth's surface why shouldn't Michelson-Morley apparatuses?1Ross Finlayson
9 Mar05:32 +* Re: If Michelson-Gale-Pearson can detect the tangential motion of Earth's surface why shouldn't Michelson-Morley apparatuses?3Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
9 Mar07:04 i+- Re: If Michelson-Gale-Pearson can detect the tangential motion of Earth's surface why shouldn't Michelson-Morley apparatuses?1Maciej Woźniak
9 Mar14:15 i`- Re: If Michelson-Gale-Pearson can detect the tangential motion of Earth's surface why shouldn't Michelson-Morley apparatuses?1Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
9 Mar11:06 `- Re: If Michelson-Gale-Pearson can detect the tangential motion of Earth's surface why shouldn't Michelson-Morley apparatuses?1Maciej Woźniak
7 Mar11:58 * Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728 (Re: AI solves probl;em Knuth was/is working on!)10Mild Shock
7 Mar12:08 `* Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728)9Mild Shock
7 Mar16:21  +* Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728)6Ross Finlayson
7 Mar16:36  i`* Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728)5Ross Finlayson
8 Mar10:00  i `* Only, three decades in software engineering? Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728)4Mild Shock
8 Mar10:19  i  `* Re: Only, three decades in software engineering? Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728)3Mild Shock
8 Mar10:34  i   `* Amazing Visual Perception, even for ASCII Input [GPT 5.3] (Was: Only, three decades in software engineering?)2Mild Shock
8 Mar20:21  i    `- Visual Perception helps reading Matrices, Fractions, etc.. (Re: Amazing Visual Perception, even for ASCII Input [GPT 5.3])1Mild Shock
9 Mar03:10  `* Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728)2x
9 Mar11:21   `- Biobrain cannot digest "Artificial" in AI (Was: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here)1Mild Shock
9 Mar03:38 o Re: Where does Relativity come from????1Ross Finlayson
9 Mar03:35 o Re: Time Dilation Experiments1Ross Finlayson
9 Mar03:35 o Re: What does gravity do to wobble the Earth?1Ross Finlayson
7 Mar15:39 * Next target < 30'000 USD (May 2022 Price) (Re: The wait is over : BTC Is indeed crashing [22.11.2025]6Mild Shock
8 Mar20:43 `* The Revolution got Confiscated: Next target < 3'000 USD (Was: Next target < 30'000 USD (May 2022 Price))5Mild Shock
8 Mar21:05  +- Re: The Revolution got Confiscated: Next target < 3'000 USD (Was: Next target < 30'000 USD (May 2022 Price))1Mild Shock
8 Mar21:05  `* Mar-A-Lago Faces will be begging for CBDC (Re: The Revolution got Confiscated: Next target < 3'000 USD)3Mild Shock
8 Mar21:37   `* Chlorophyll-Powered Quantum Coins [Solar Punks] (Was: Mar-A-Lago Faces will be begging for CBDC)2Mild Shock
8 Mar22:12    `- 2025 was the year of energy and materials (Was: Chlorophyll-Powered Quantum Coins [Solar Punks])1Mild Shock
5 Mar03:08 * Re: If Sagnac experiments get non-null results then why shouldn't Krisher et al.'s 1990 experiment?4amirjf nin
5 Mar13:37 `* Re: If Sagnac experiments get non-null results then why shouldn't Krisher et al.'s 1990 experiment?3Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
6 Mar22:11  `* Re: If Sagnac experiments get non-null results then why shouldn't Krisher et al.'s 1990 experiment?2amirjf nin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal