Liste des Groupes | Revenir à l misc |
On 18/04/2024 10:36, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:Why not include c.l.forth?On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:30:49 +0200, David Brown wrote:"word" in Forth terminology is more like "function" in common imperative languages. (It is not exactly the same, since Forth "words" are much more flexible - that is both a good thing and a bad thing.)
>With the list of pointers design of Forth, you can just>
redefine these "local" words as you need to, and ignore any previous
definitions.
So, they reinvented local variables, and thought it was some great
innovation ...
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.