Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages

In article <87v7wfrx26.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>,
Rainer Weikusat  <rweikusat@talktalk.net> wrote:

cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes:

In article <87zflrs1ti.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>,
Rainer Weikusat  <rweikusat@talktalk.net> wrote:

Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> writes:
>
[...]
>
>

Something which would match [0-9]+ in its first argument (if any) would
be:
>
#include "string.h"
#include "stdlib.h"
>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    char *p;
    unsigned c;
>
    p = argv[1];
    if (!p) exit(1);
    while (c = *p, c && c - '0' > 10) ++p;

>
This needs to be
>
while (c = *p, c && c - '0' > 9) ++p

>
No, that's still wrong.  Try actually running it.

>
If you know something that's wrong with that, why not write it instead
of utilizing the claim for pointless (and wrong) snide remarks?

>
I did, at length, in my other post.