Re: OT: "All Rights Reserved" misleading nonsense

Kaz Kylheku wrote:
 > On 2025-10-18, Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> wrote:
 >> On 2025-10-18, Tristan Wibberley wrote:
 >>
 >>> The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except
 >>> citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except as noted
 >>> in the sig.
 >>
 >> Eh, do drop the quite inaccurate and nowadays even not necessary at
 >> all (given that all signataries to the Buenos Aires convention have
 >> adhered to the Berne convention) "All Rights Reserved" ...
 >
 > "All Rights Reserved" means that the author has not waived any
 > copyrights; the work may not be copied or redistributed other than by
 > the copyright holder.
 >
 > "This work may be freely redistributed under such and such conditions"
 > and "all rights reserved" are conflicting statements, since the author
 > has waived (thus not reserved) the distribution right (to be the sole
 > redistributor).
In my young, fatuous days, i vandalized a few softwares to say
"All rights reversed".  ;)