Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method

On 5/13/2024 9:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/13/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:

>
Remember, p defined as ~True(L, p) is BY DEFINITION a truth bearer, as True must return a Truth Value for all inputs, and ~ a truth valus is always the other truth value.
>

>
Can a sequence of true preserving operations applied to expressions
that are stipulated to be true derive p?

On 5/15/2024 8:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > Which has NOTHING to do with the problem with True(L, p)
 > being true when p is defined in L as ~True(L, p)
*YOU ALREADY AGREED THAT True(L, p) IS FALSE*

>
No, so True(L, p) is false
and thus ~True(L, p) is true.
 

>
Can a sequence of true preserving operations applied to expressions
that are stipulated to be true derive ~p?

 

On 5/15/2024 7:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > Which has NOTHING to do with the above,
 > as we never refered to False(L,p).
*YOU ALREADY AGREED THAT false(L, p) IS FALSE*

>
No, so False(L, p) is false,
 

Please try and keep these two thoughts together at the same time
*I need to make another point that depends on both of them*
*YOU ALREADY AGREED THAT True(L, p) IS FALSE*
*YOU ALREADY AGREED THAT false(L, p) IS FALSE*
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer