Sujet : Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 20. May 2025, 17:58:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <100icbu$2au2m$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 20/05/2025 17:46, olcott wrote:
On 5/20/2025 11:44 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 20/05/2025 17:18, olcott wrote:
No one has actually made any rebuttal of my actual points.
>
It's far from clear what your actual points are.
>
But I repeat myself.
>
Mike Terry Proves ---
How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
The evidence of articles posted in this newsgroup suggests strongly that what you think Mike Terry 'proves' is very different from what he thinks he's saying.
It also suggests that you are trying to muddy the waters.
I think you're being deliberately unclear and trying your utmost not to be understood.
Why, I know not. But you are not behaving as someone would who has confidence in his argument. If you truly believed you were right, you would be doing your utmost to make yourself clear. Every foolish repetition and every pointless evasion makes it harder and harder for anyone to take you seriously.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within