Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 2025-05-20 14:42:36 +0000, olcott said:I have suggested to him that he puts ALL of the words --- all the important ones, anyway --- on a Web site so that he doesn't feel obliged to post reams and reams of copy-paste over and over. It would be one single place where he can make himself abundantly clear.
On 5/20/2025 2:13 AM, Mikko wrote:True, but the incorrectness is in the atribution of the claim,On 2025-05-20 04:24:02 +0000, olcott said:>
>On 5/19/2025 5:20 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2025-05-18 20:19:19 +0000, olcott said:>
>>>
You keep the strawman fallacy.
A straw man fallacy is a (usually) correct refutation of something.
The strawman fallacy is stipulated to be incorrect
that is what the word "fallacy" means.
not in the refutation. If there is a fallacy in the refutation
then it is called by some other term, depending on the what is
wrong there.
Yes, but that hasn't stopped you.>It seems quite stupid to say that an error of reasoning>
is correct. You might as well have said all dogs are cows.
A straw man fallacy is not an error of reasoning. It is a false
attribution of the claim that is refuted.
Any attempt to refute X by changing the subject to Y
is dishonest.
You can never find out because you can't determine what I have noticed>*The rules of correct reasoning define it as incorrect*>
If the correctness of an inference depends on who presented the
claim the those "rules of correct reasoning" are unsound.
How many times do I have to repeat this before you
notice ALL of the words that I said?
and what not.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.