Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
Op 12.jun.2025 om 17:30 schreef olcott:The code of the input to HHH(DD) specifies
Even after many corrections, Olcott repeated his claims without learning anything from his previous errors.
Lack of knowledge does not make someone look stupid, but the resistance against learning does.
int DD()Showing the failure of HHH to reach the end of the simulation.
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
>
It is a verified fact that DD() *is* one of the forms
of the counter-example input as such an input would
be encoded in C. Christopher Strachey wrote his in CPL.
>
// rec routine P
// §L :if T[P] go to L
// Return §
// https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article/7/4/313/354243
void Strachey_P()
{
L: if (HHH(Strachey_P)) goto L;
return;
}
>
https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article-abstract/7/4/313/354243? redirectedFrom=fulltext
>
It *is* a verified fact DD correctly simulated by HHH
cannot possibly reach its own "return" statement
final halt state.
A simulation that is no problem for other world-class simulators.--
What is the purpose to verify the fact of a failure? Another confirmation of the halting theorem?
>Halt.c includes code to abort and halt the simulation.
All of the above code is fully operational in this file
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
>
HHH is not able to simulate this code correctly, because the criteria to abort are incorrect. It aborts the simulation even for some halting programs, including the simulation of itself.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.