Sujet : Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 23. Jun 2025, 18:34:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103c36l$1cme6$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/23/2025 10:34 AM, joes wrote:
Am Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:30:07 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/23/2025 6:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
In particular, the pattern you are trying to claim to use, is part of
the Halting Program D, DD, and DDD, so it is BY DEFINITION incorrect.
If you read the 38 pages you will see how this is incorrect. ChatGPT
"understands" that any program that must be aborted at some point to
prevent its infinite execution is not a halting program.
Such as HHH, making it not a decider (when simulated).
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
*dead obvious to any first year computer science student*
My claim is that DDD correctly simulated by any simulating
termination analyzer HHH that can possibly exist cannot possibly
reach its own simulated "return" statement final halt state.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer