Sujet : Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 25. Jun 2025, 16:42:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103h5dc$2rinm$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/25/2025 2:38 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-06-24 14:39:52 +0000, olcott said:
*ChatGPT and I agree that*
The directly executed DDD() is merely the first step of
otherwise infinitely recursive emulation that is terminated
at its second step.
No matter who agrees, the directly executed DDD is mote than
merely the first step of otherwise infinitely recursive
emulation that is terminated at its second step. Not much
more but anyway. After the return of HHH(DDD) there is the
return from DDD which is the last thing DDD does before its
termination.
*HHH(DDD) the input to HHH specifies non-terminating behavior*
The fact that DDD() itself halts does not contradict that
because the directly executing DDD() cannot possibly be an
input to HHH in the Turing machine model of computation,
thus is outside of the domain of HHH.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer