Sujet : Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- different execution traces have different behavior !!!
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 06. Oct 2024, 18:29:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <2996169ade3affa1d5f573667dafb110aefe86e0@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/6/24 1:07 PM, olcott wrote:
On 10/6/2024 11:59 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 10/6/24 8:39 AM, olcott wrote:
>
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH that can possibly
exist never returns. Each of these HHH emulators that does
return 0 correctly reports the above non-halting behavior.
>
>
>
>
No, the DDD return (if the HHH(DDD) gives an answer), just after the HHH that emulated them gave up.
>
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH that can possibly
exist never returns.
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH
Which, as you have been told but seems to be above your head means that the execution of DDD, the DDD that HHH emulated, which, for the HHH that return 0, is to halt.
What you MEAN is the
EMULATION of DDD by HHH
Buty that would reveal your error, so you just lie about it.
Each of these HHH emulators that emulates the above DDD
and returns 0 correctly reports the above non-halting
behavior.
Nope, Since as shown, the ACTUAL behavior of that DDD is to halt.
The emulation didn't get there, but that isn't what you words are talking about even if you want them to.
This just shows that
PPPP EEEEE TTTTT EEEEE RRRR
P P E T E R R
P P E T E R R
PPPP EEEEE T EEEEE RRRR
P E T E R R
P E T E R R
P EEEEE T EEEEE R R
OOO L CCC OOO TTTTT TTTTT
O O L C C O O T T
O O L C O O T T
O O L C O O T T
O O L C O O T T
O O L C C O O T T
OOO LLLLL CCC OOO T T
L IIIII EEEEE SSS
L I E S S
L I E S
L I EEEEE SSS
L I E S
L I E S S
LLLLL IIIII EEEEE SSS
AND THINKS THAT IS JUST OK.
…