Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 5/7/2025 9:22 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:Nope. Just prove again that you are just a liar.On 07/05/2025 14:22, olcott wrote:Every sufficiently competent C program has agreed.On 5/7/2025 1:18 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:>
<snip>
>>There's also an important difference between claiming that Mike's claim is counter-factual and /proving/ that his claim is counter- factual.>
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
Yeah, you keep posting that, as if it had some kind of persuasive power.
>
It doesn't.
>
The DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "return" instruction.
If you are totally clueless about programming youNo, it seems you are the totally clueless one, as you don't undertstand what a program is, and try to get away with equivocation.
won't get this.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.