Sujet : Re: Halting Problem: What Constitutes Pathological Input --- TOTALLY CLUELESS
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 08. May 2025, 03:47:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <692a52d19762ab14922518857a1a5a1c2471e972@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/7/25 10:56 AM, olcott wrote:
On 5/7/2025 9:22 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 07/05/2025 14:22, olcott wrote:
On 5/7/2025 1:18 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>
<snip>
>
There's also an important difference between claiming that Mike's claim is counter-factual and /proving/ that his claim is counter- factual.
>
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
>
Yeah, you keep posting that, as if it had some kind of persuasive power.
>
It doesn't.
>
Every sufficiently competent C program has agreed.
The DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "return" instruction.
Nope. Just prove again that you are just a liar.
If you are totally clueless about programming you
won't get this.
No, it seems you are the totally clueless one, as you don't undertstand what a program is, and try to get away with equivocation.
…