Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 04. Aug 2024, 19:54:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <a7d98f536ed0dfcab52215e73ff85556026f3f0a@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/4/24 9:11 AM, olcott wrote:
On 8/4/2024 1:26 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 03.aug.2024 om 17:20 schreef olcott:>>
When you try to show how DDD simulated by HHH does
reach its "return" instruction you must necessarily
must fail unless you cheat by disagreeing with the
semantics of C. That you fail to have a sufficient
understanding of the semantics of C is less than no
rebuttal what-so-ever.
>
Fortunately that is not what I try, because I understand that HHH cannot possibly simulate itself correctly.
>
 void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
 In other words when HHH simulates itself simulating DDD it
is supposed to do something other than simulating itself
simulating DDD ???  Do you expect it to make a cup of coffee?
 
No, but to be correct it need to complete that to the end.
Of course to do that you need to find some N that is greater than N+1, which is an impossible task.
Thus, HHH can not correctly emulate itself.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal