Sujet : Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 04. Jul 2024, 14:09:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <a9f31a178ec10c3a25aa7e03c2574cb3ad01d1c9@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 04 Jul 2024 07:53:07 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/4/2024 6:09 AM, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 03 Jul 2024 10:55:14 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/3/2024 10:52 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 03.jul.2024 om 15:24 schreef olcott:
On 7/3/2024 3:42 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 03.jul.2024 om 05:55 schreef olcott:
On 7/2/2024 10:50 PM, joes wrote:
Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:46:38 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/2/2024 2:17 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 21:00 schreef olcott:
On 7/2/2024 1:42 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 14:22 schreef olcott:
On 7/2/2024 3:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 03:25 schreef olcott:
Similarly, if you think that HHH can simulate itself correctly, you
are wrong.
int H(ptr p, ptr i);
int main()
{
return H(main, 0);
}
You showed that H returns, but that the simulation thinks it does not
return.
DDD is making it unnecessarily complex, but has the same problem.
main correctly emulated by H never stops running unless aborted.
As a matter of fact, H does abort it. H then returns to main,
which then stops running.
main correctly simulated by H never returns.
I was talking about main itself.
-- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:Objectively I am a genius.
…