Sujet : Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 04. Jul 2024, 12:05:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <c932a0dabd6ef1285bc553269e2d61b7d9eabc2b@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:27:50 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/30/2024 7:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/30/24 8:00 PM, olcott wrote:
>
THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT?
>
But it does, just after H gives up its simulation.
You have even show that with a simulation.
DDD correctly emulated by HHH calls an emulated HHH(DDD)
that emulates its own DDD that calls an emulated HHH(DDD)
that is either aborted at some point never returning or hits
out-of-memory error never returning
Running out of memory is only a physical constraint of no concern
to the theoretical behaviour.
-- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:Objectively I am a genius.
…