Sujet : Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 14. May 2025, 09:17:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <ee7015d55d1b71642a631530d0f4d3c52dafed9a@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Tue, 13 May 2025 21:43:32 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 5/13/2025 8:58 PM, dbush wrote:
Then maybe you should stop implying that Sipser agrees with the above
when it's been proven on multiple occasions that he has not.
*That* is dishonest.
I have the emails where he agreed that I could publish his agreement
with those exact words. Ben also checked this and verified it.
Please publish those instead of paraphrasing.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.