Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 2024-06-01 18:34:22 +0000, olcott said:It turns out that "that is what the phrase means" is merely a false
On 6/1/2024 1:28 PM, joes wrote:Your "DD correctly simulated by pure function HH" is an attemptAm Fri, 31 May 2024 09:25:40 -0500 schrieb olcott:>On 5/31/2024 2:50 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 31.mei.2024 om 00:01 schreef olcott:On 5/30/2024 4:54 PM, joes wrote:Am Thu, 30 May 2024 09:55:24 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>typedef int (*ptr)(); // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00 int H(ptr p, ptr i);
01 int D(ptr p)
02 {
03 int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
04 if (Halt_Status)
05 HERE: goto HERE;
06 return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11 H(D,D);
12 return 0;
13 }>Everyone with sufficient knowledge of C can easily determine that DYeah, of course not, if H doesn’t halt.
correctly emulated by any *pure function* H (using an x86 emulator)
cannot possibly reach its own simulated final state at line 06 and
halt.The fuck? If H halts, then D can definitely reach past line 4.*pure function H definitely halts you are confused*Or maybe you did not know that every computation that never reachesSince the claim is that H is also a computation, it holds for H, as
its own final state *DOES NOT HALT* even if it stops running because
it is no longer simulated.
well. That means that H *DOES NOT HALT* even if it stops running because
it is no longer simulated.
>
*Trying to get away with changing the subject away from this*
*is known as the strawman deception*
>
DD correctly simulated by pure function HH cannot possibly reach
its own final state at line 06 in any finite number of steps of
correct simulation.
to deceive. Otherwise you would just say "DD" because that is
what the phrase means.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.