Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 6/10/2024 1:30 AM, Mikko wrote:Which assumption might be incorrect. Usually IQ tests are normalized soOn 2024-06-09 16:23:37 +0000, olcott said:My IQ is more than two standard deviations above the mean
On 6/9/2024 10:56 AM, Mikko wrote:The difference between two standard deviations from mean andOn 2024-06-09 13:58:35 +0000, olcott said:More than two standard deviations above the mean is atypical.
On 6/9/2024 3:38 AM, Mikko wrote:Loosely speaking all but last 2% is normal, and peoöoe usuallyOn 2024-06-09 04:02:11 +0000, olcott said:Thus directly disagreeing with the technical term that is
On 6/8/2024 10:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:In Mensa we call your kind of people "normal".On 6/8/24 10:58 PM, olcott wrote:I only missed Mensa by one point I am in the top 97%On 6/8/2024 9:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:No, are you THAT stupid?On 6/8/24 6:34 PM, olcott wrote:Are you asking how does infinite recursion terminate normally?On 6/8/2024 5:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:So, how does the x86 processor get back to executing that adderess in the direct simulation by the outer HH as required by your definition of correct simulation.On 6/8/24 6:04 PM, olcott wrote:Yes and by this same incorrect reasoningOn 6/8/2024 4:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:Except that the actual x86 trace never gets back there, so this is NOT a "Correct simulation" trace of the input.On 6/8/24 5:42 PM, olcott wrote:The simulated of DD is proven to be correct by the factOn 6/8/2024 4:37 PM, joes wrote:So, you should have stopped reading your own writing decades ago.Am Sat, 08 Jun 2024 15:15:45 -0500 schrieb olcott:>On 6/8/2024 2:59 PM, joes wrote:Am Sat, 08 Jun 2024 13:36:04 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 6/8/2024 1:12 PM, joes wrote:Still waiting on this.Am Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:10:33 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 6/8/2024 11:03 AM, Richard Damon wrote:What are all the other HH?On 6/8/24 11:32 AM, olcott wrote:On 6/8/2024 10:15 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 6/8/24 11:07 AM, olcott wrote:On 6/8/2024 9:54 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 6/8/24 10:20 AM, olcott wrote:On 6/8/2024 9:10 AM, Richard Damon wrote:A simulator that simulates something different than the real thing isDD *correctly* simulated by HH has provably different behavior than the
not a simulator.
directly behavior of the executed DD(DD).I mean, if one of them must be wrong, it can only be the simulator.I proved otherwise and you ignored it.
I am always going to stop reading at the first big mistake
so this mistake can be focused on an corrected.
When are you going to fix your x86utm to match your current definition of correct simulation?
that both execution traces match the x86 source-code of DD.
<sarcasm>
we know that all infinite recursion always
terminates normally because "infinite recursion" is a
term-of-the-art that means {terminates normally}.
</sarcasm>
applied to standard deviations above the mean. Top 3% is
on the tail of the bell curve.
speak loosely.
Two standard deviations below the mean is the measure of mental
impairment qualifying for disability benefits.
An actual Mensa member would know this.
past 98% of the population is so small it does not matter.
when we assume that a standard deviation is 15.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.