Sujet : Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 04. Jul 2024, 16:58:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v66gqc$2qr6f$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/4/2024 10:03 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:32:10 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/4/2024 8:09 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 04 Jul 2024 07:53:07 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/4/2024 6:09 AM, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 03 Jul 2024 10:55:14 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/3/2024 10:52 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Similarly, if you think that HHH can simulate itself correctly, you
are wrong.
int H(ptr p, ptr i);
int main()
{
return H(main, 0);
}
You showed that H returns, but that the simulation thinks it does
not return.
main correctly emulated by H never stops running unless aborted.
As a matter of fact, H does abort it. H then returns to main,
which then stops running.
main correctly simulated by H never returns.
I was talking about main itself.
That is not the one that HHH examines.
Huh? HHH examines main. Sure, it doesn’t /simulate/ the return.
You don't know enough about operating system programming
to understand this.
There is more than one main() process. One of them cannot
possibly halt and the other one halts.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…