Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider
De : abc (at) *nospam* def.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 07. Aug 2024, 14:12:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8vrsb$32fso$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/7/2024 1:59 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-08-04 19:33:36 +0000, olcott said:
 
On 8/4/2024 2:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/4/24 2:49 PM, olcott wrote:
On 8/4/2024 1:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/4/24 10:46 AM, olcott wrote:
When we define an input that does the opposite of whatever
value that its halt decider reports there is a way for the
halt decider to report correctly.
>
int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
int main()
{
   HHH(DD);
}
>
HHH returns false indicating that it cannot
correctly determine that its input halts.
True would mean that its input halts.
>
>
But false indicates that the input does not halt, but it does.
>
>
I made a mistake that I corrected on a forum that allows
editing: *Defining a correct halting decidability decider*
1=input does halt
0=input cannot be decided to halt
>
And thus, not a halt decider.
>
Sorry, you are just showing your ignorance.
>
And, the problem is that a given DD *CAN* be decided about halting, just not by HHH, so "can not be decided" is not a correct answer.
>
A single universal decider can correctly determine whether
or not an input could possibly be denial-of-service-attack.
0=yes does not halt or pathological self-reference
1=no  halts
 Conventionally the value 0 is used for "no" (for example, no errors)
and value 1 for "yes". If there are different "yes" results other
A Conventional halt decider is 1 for halts and 0 for does not halt.
0 also means input has pathological relationship to decider.
In other words 1 means good input and 0 means bad input.

numbers in addition to 1 can be used. For example, for the question
"is there anu errors?" the number may identify the error. For a
partial halt decider the best values are
-1 = does not halt
0 = not determined
1 = halts.
 In C the value 0 is interpreted as false and every other number,
positive or negative, is interpreted as true in every context
where a boolean value is expected.
 
I have known that since K&R was the standard.
I met Bjarne Stroustrup we he went around the country
promoting his new C++ language at the local universities.
He was a tee shirt and blue jeans kind of guy.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal