Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth

On 8/18/2024 4:10 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-08-17 18:39:47 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 8/17/2024 1:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/17/24 2:11 PM, olcott wrote:>>>>

Utterly baseless false assumption that is directly
contradicted by the verified fact that x86utm takes
Halt7.obj as its input data, thus having all of the
machine code of HHH directly available to DDD.

>
But x86utm isn't HHH.
>
>
x86utm doesn't take "DDD" as its input, but the COFF file that contains the whole problem.
>

>
Thus DDD has direct access to HHH in this shared memory space.

 Which does meet the requirements of "emulation". In order to be
a valid emulation the memory space of the emulated system must
be simulated to the extend the emulated program acesses it.
 

*No: infinite loops need not be infinitely emulated*
A process similar to mathematical induction correctly
predicts when an unlimited emulation of an input
cannot possibly stop running unless aborted.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer