Sujet : Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 20. Aug 2024, 02:38:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <va0s29$376ed$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/19/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/19/24 8:50 PM, olcott wrote:
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
*It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to*
*the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop*
*running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded)
X = DDD emulated by HHH∞ according to the semantics of the x86 language
Y = HHH∞ never aborts its emulation of DDD
Z = DDD never stops running
The above claim boils down to this: (X ∧ Y) ↔ Z
void EEE()
{
HERE: goto HERE;
}
HHHn correctly predicts the behavior of DDD the same
way that HHHn correctly predicts the behavior of EEE.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…