Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
Am Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:18:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 8/20/2024 5:29 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Op 20.aug.2024 om 06:33 schreef olcott:On 8/19/2024 11:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 8/19/24 11:50 PM, olcott wrote:On 8/19/2024 10:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 8/19/24 10:47 PM, olcott wrote:Counter factual. HHH∞ is hypothetical thus takes no memory.Not all HHH can be at the same memory at the same time.But HHHn isn't given DDD∞ as its input, so that doesn't matter.All of the DDD have identical bytes it is only the HHH that varies.
HHHn(DDD) predicts the behavior of HHH∞(DDD).
HHH and DDD remains at the same physical machine address locations.
HHH_oo can be implemented.A change of one line of code would do this.
When HHHn is in the memory, then DDD calls HHHn, not HHH∞.HHH∞ is hypothetical thus takes no memory. HHHn(DDD) predicts the
When HHHn is doing the simulation, HHHn is in that memory, therefore,
it should simulate HHHn, not HHH∞.
They cannot be at the same memory location at the same time, unless you
are cheating with the Root variable to switch between HHHn and HHH∞,
which causes HHHn to process the non-input HHH∞ instead of the input
HHHn.
behavior of a hypothetical HHH∞(DDD) as described below
HHHn should simulate itself, and HHH_oo should also be simulated by*This is HHHn and it does emulate itself emulating DDD*
itself.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.