Sujet : Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 03. Sep 2024, 15:03:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vb71fn$3b4ub$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/3/2024 3:39 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-09-02 13:33:36 +0000, olcott said:
On 9/1/2024 5:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-09-01 03:04:43 +0000, olcott said:
>
*I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases*
>
knowledge is a justified true belief such that the
justification is sufficient reason to accept the
truth of the belief.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem
>
The remaining loophole is the lack of an exact definition
of "sufficient reason".
>
>
Ultimately sufficient reason is correct semantic
entailment from verified facts.
The problem is "verified" facts: what is sufficient verification?
Stipulated to be true is always sufficient:
Cats are a know if animal.
Empirically verified to be true in the current moment:
I have a left hand right now, is sufficient.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…