Sujet : Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 02. Oct 2024, 10:42:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <vdj4hr$2k6$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (FreeBSD/14.1-RELEASE-p3 (amd64))
olcott <
polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/1/2024 2:15 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/1/2024 7:39 AM, olcott wrote:
Simulating Termination Analyzer H is Not Fooled by Pathological Input D
[ .... ]
https://chatgpt.com/share/66fbec5c-7b10-8011-9ce6-3c26424cb21c
The above link to a ChatGPT conversation is entirely
complete with the first part being the entire input
provided to ChatGPT. The second part is the output that
ChatGPT deriving from analyzing this input.
You are aware that programs like ChatGPT are know for "hallucinating"
non-facts? They have even less understanding of the truth than you do.
In fact, they tend to regurgitate whatever "facts" they are fed with.
In other words you can convince it that its analysis
of my work is incorrect. I dare you to try to do that.
I've got better things to do with my time. Real live competent
mathematicians have shown your work to be incorrect. What a dumb chat
program regurgitates has no relevance to anything.
[ .... ]
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
-- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
…