Sujet : Re: HHH(DDD)==0
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 09. Oct 2024, 11:08:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <ve5kmb$2k3oc$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-10-09 03:47:10 +0000, olcott said:
On 10/8/2024 7:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
> Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
> someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar". So which are you?
> Not sane? Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is
> incapable of conceding them? Or lying when you describe Peter? You
> must surely have better things to do. Meanwhile, you surely noticed
> that Peter is running rings around you.
I am incapable of conceding this self-evident truth:
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH that can possibly
exist never returns
That is not self-evident or even meaningful without a definition of
"each corresponding HHH".
-- Mikko
…