Re: Richard given an official cease-and-desist order regarding counter-factual libelous statements

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Richard given an official cease-and-desist order regarding counter-factual libelous statements
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 12. Oct 2024, 09:29:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <vedc19$3k25$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-10-11 22:34:13 +0000, olcott said:

On 10/11/2024 5:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
O

No, it shows that HHH can not correctly emulate DDD and return an answer.
 That you can't even pay attention to the fact that we are
only talking about the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH and
not talking about whether or not HHH returns a value would
seem to be a good incompetence defense to defamation.
You are not paying attention to the fact that DDD returns if and only
if HHH(DDD) returns, so the qestions whether HHH returns and wehther
DDD returns are essentially the same.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal