Re: ChatGPT 4.0 keeps refuting every rebuttal of my work ---

On 10/23/2024 2:21 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-22 13:57:22 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 10/22/2024 2:07 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-21 13:44:01 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 10/21/2024 3:32 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-21 01:09:00 +0000, olcott said:
>

This is the recent dialogue that has been discussed
for a few days with exactly one more question added:
>
Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on the
behavior of the directly executed DDD()?
>
https://chatgpt.com/share/67158ec6-3398-8011-98d1-41198baa29f2
The first less than one page is the entire basis that
ChatGPT 4.0 uses to evaluate my work.

>
From the linked page: "This conversation may reflect the
link creator’s personalized data, which isn’t shared and
can meaningfully change how the model responds."
>
ChatGPT is not an authority on anything. If you can't make present
your argument then you can't argue. Opinions of an artificial idiot
are not interesting.

>
I dare you to find any mistake.
The less than half page that I teach it is all
correct C and correct software engineering.

>
If you put a working draft on a web page then I may try. ChatGPT
is inherently uninteresting. Usenet messages are too temporary
for anything other than response messages.
>

>
USENET messages seems to be the most reliable permanent archive.

 USENET is not an archive. It is possible to maintain an archive of
usenet messages but such arcive is not a part is USENET and is not
required by USENET rules.
 

https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/385090708_ChatGPT_Analyzes_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer
*I will update this periodically*

 We may comment when you post update notifications.
 

In the above version ChatGPT answers the following question:
>
Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on the behavior of the directly executed DDD()?

 That is not a well posed quesstion. What is the range of allowed
hyptheses for by "could"? What is the norm that defines "correct"?
 By the usual meaning of "report" it is not correct to say that HHH
reports anything. If simply says "true" or "false". The usual meainig
of "report" is that it would at least say what is true.
 Your question above is essentially whether "yes" nor "no" is the right
answer to an unkonwn question.
 

Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on the behavior of the directly executed DDD()?
Within this context:
https://chatgpt.com/share/67158ec6-3398-8011-98d1-41198baa29f2
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer