Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 2024-11-02 13:35:57 +0000, olcott said:2 + 3 = 5 is correct anyone disagreeing is wrong.
On 11/2/2024 8:18 AM, joes wrote:The word "correctly" is not a part of a truth but depends on comparisonAm Sat, 02 Nov 2024 06:19:49 -0500 schrieb olcott:>On 11/2/2024 3:43 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2024-11-01 12:10:41 +0000, olcott said:On 11/1/2024 5:40 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2024-11-01 00:12:37 +0000, olcott said:On 10/31/2024 6:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 10/31/24 7:43 PM, olcott wrote:On 10/31/2024 6:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 10/31/24 12:12 PM, olcott wrote:On 10/31/2024 11:03 AM, Andy Walker wrote:On 31/10/2024 11:01, Mikko wrote:On 2024-10-30 11:17:45 +0000, Andy Walker said:On 30/10/2024 03:50, Jeff Barnett wrote:It is also deceptive to call a statement true when you really onlyIt is also deceptive to call a statement {false} when you really onlyThat may be its base meaning but the full meaning includes all falseNot at all. The base meaning of {lie} requires intentional deception.A false assertion is a lie even if nobody asserts it.It can't possibly be a lie because I am not even asserting it as aWhich is just a lie, so you are just admitting to not knowing whatSo, are you willing to state that you are admitting that nothingI am admitting one of two things:
you might come up with has any bearing on the original halting
problem because you are working in a new framework?
(1) Everyone has misconstrued the original halting problem as not
applying to the behavior actually specified by the actual input
finite string.
the facts are.
truth only a possible truth of two possible truths.
statements. The statement itself does not change when someone states it
so there is no clear advantage in saying that the statement was not a
lie until someone stated it.
mean that the statement is inconsistent with the current received view
and not false in every sense.
In this case the most honest thing to say is X is not the way that most
experts look at it. X is not a lie and X is not even false.
mean that there might be a sense in which it is, without telling.
>
It is true that HHH correctly rejects DDD as non-halting
on the basis that DDD emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own return instruction.
to something unspecified.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.