Sujet : Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 16. Nov 2024, 18:18:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhak59$47n9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/16/2024 10:51 AM, joes wrote:
Am Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:17:21 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/16/2024 8:26 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/16/24 9:09 AM, olcott wrote:
On 11/16/2024 6:36 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/15/24 11:17 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/15/2024 10:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/15/24 10:57 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/15/2024 9:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/15/24 10:32 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/15/2024 9:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/15/24 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/14/2024 8:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/14/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/14/2024 2:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/14/24 3:28 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/14/2024 2:22 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
joes <noreply@example.org> wrote:
That behavior that HHH is supposed to be reporting on is
the behavior of the actual direct exectution of the program
described by the input,
>
IN OTHER WORDS YOU ARE SAYING THAT HHH SHOULD STUPIDLY
IGNORE THE FACT THAT DDD DOES SPECIFY THAT HHH MUST EMULATE
ITSELF EMULATING DDD
Your "Source Code", is NOT an axiom of the system.
WHich isn't a complete program, so a LIE to call it one.
>
I never called it a complete program and you swear your own allegiance
to the father of lies by saying that I did.
I hereby swear allegiance to the father of lies.
That may seem funny from an atheist POV unless and until
it directly results in eternal incineration.
In any case people that lie about my work prove their
lack of moral integrity.
Which HHH does DDD call, the one that aborts?
This has never made any damn difference.
The fact remains that DDD emulated by any HHH cannot
possibly reach its own "return" instruction final halt
state no matter WTF else IS THE CORRECT BASIS.
When an emulator emulates an infinite loop we do not
count this emulated infinite loop as halting when we
yank the power cord out.
HALTING IS ONLY REACHING A FINAL HALT STATE.
That I have to keep telling you this seems to
indicate that you are a liar.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…