Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar

On 11/21/24 12:18 AM, olcott wrote:

On 11/20/2024 10:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/20/24 10:45 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/20/2024 8:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/20/24 9:39 PM, olcott wrote:

>
What I say is proven true by the meaning of its words
and you lie about this condemning yourself to actual Hell.

>
No, and you have shown you don't KNOW the meaning of the words, because you are using "Terms of Art" in an art that you are just ignorant of.
>

>
DDD emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its "return"
instruction final halt state.

>
Which is an invalid criteria for a decider, and even invalid for saying "never"
>

>
THAT IS NOT THE SAME AS SAYING IT IS FALSE.

>
It surely isn't true, which is what you need it to be.
>

>
Of course it is true. I just don't get it why you want to
condemn yourself to Hell over this. Are you a fake Christian?

 It isn't a valid condition to talk about for a decider, so just like the Liar's Paradox, it is untrue.