Sujet : Re: Universal Compiler
De : Muttley (at) *nospam* DastardlyHQ.org
Groupes : comp.lang.c++ comp.theoryDate : 09. Feb 2025, 17:28:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <voal34$nl09$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 12:05:07 +0000
Mr Flibble <
leigh@i42.co.uk> wibbled:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:16:28 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org
wrote:
>
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:46:54 +0000
Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> wibbled:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:40:09 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com
wrote:
Take a ticket and join the clue of delusionals who think they can re-invent
the wheel so much better than people with decades of experience.
>
Ah, the ad hominim attack; why am I not surprised? You need to learn
how to properly engage in a technical argument, dear.
>
You have had a habit in the past of making grand pronouncements of your
own abilities and have demonstrated bugger all. Why will this be any
different?
>
I have demonstrated plenty.
Really? When and where?
Go on then, lets see it.
>
I will probably support Sinclair BASIC due to the nostalgia factor.
When you eventually do, be sure to let us know.
TBD
>
Oh right, so you're just working on a parser, not an actual compiler. Got it.
>
So you don't know what "TBD" means.
No, no idea whatsoever. But when you finally do decide, be sure to let us know
so we can marvel at the magnificence of your "compiler".
Re: Universal Compiler
Re: Universal Compiler