Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:

On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.

I wonder why Olcott keeps repeating that HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction, where the direct execution or world-class simulators have no problem to reach the 'ret' instruction of exactly the same finite string as input.

>
The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
own "ret" instruction.
>

And that is exactly what Olcott does not show.

>
Likewise I never attempt to show exactly how
all squares are round.
>

So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction, where the direct execution and some world-class simulators have no problem to reach it.

>
DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HHH1.
DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.

>
Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its own emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated.
>

>
It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using
the straw-man deception to change the subject away from:
>
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
>
>

>
WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines.
>

>
I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit
dodging that point.
>

 Wrong order,

Date	Sujet	#		Auteur
8 Apr 26	…

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal