On 3/5/2025 7:26 PM, olcott wrote:In other words I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY BULLSHIT DEFLECTION.On 3/5/2025 5:16 PM, dbush wrote:In other words, you know that what you're working on has nothing to do with the halting problem, but you don't care.On 3/5/2025 5:51 PM, olcott wrote:>On 3/5/2025 3:39 PM, dbush wrote:>On 3/5/2025 4:37 PM, olcott wrote:>On 3/5/2025 3:03 PM, dbush wrote:>On 3/5/2025 3:55 PM, olcott wrote:>On 3/5/2025 10:14 AM, joes wrote:>Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott:>On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts
wrote:Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef
olcott:What is the next step?My proof requires a specific prerequisite order. OneIn other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, evenI WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDERWrong order,I will show that it is not straw-man after youWHich is the strawman, that you are too stupidIt is not my stupidity it is your dishonestlyWhich just show your stupidity, as DDSo, my claim remains: HHH fails to reachDD calls its own emulator when emulated by
the 'ret' instruction, where the direct
execution and some world-class simulators have no problem to reach it.
HHH. DD DOES NOT call its own emulator
when emulated by HHH1. DD DOES NOT call
its own emulator when directly executed.
doesn't HAVE its own emulator, and CAN'T
know who or if it is being emulated.
using the straw-man deception to change the
subject away from: DD correctly emulated by
HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
to recogines.
quit dodging that point.
though logically requried, because you need to hide your
fraud.
cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to
ten. DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally. Is the
first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof
>
*DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach* *its own
"ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>
It has taken two years to create this first step such that it is the the simplest way to state the key element of the whole
proof and make this element impossible to correctly refute.
>
EVERY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS POINT IS
DISHONEST.
>
Before agreeing on an answer, it is first required to agree on
the question.
*DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach* *its own
"ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>
This is irrefutable. Every attempt to show otherwise has been a
change of subject.
>
Until we have mutual agreement on that key most important point
upon which all other points depend this point will be repeated.
>
So if you say "there's a black cat in the kitchen" and I want to
know if there's a white dog in my living room, how is that in any
way useful?
In other words
You'll be disappointed when you realize what you've been working on is the wrong thing.
Off topic, thus ignored.
True(X) is required for righteousness.
>
You have proven that you know these things pretty well SO QUIT THE SHIT!
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
| Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
| 8 Apr 26 |  … |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.