Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 12/03/2025 02:29, olcott wrote:You can't freaking correctly determine that nitwit unlessThe lack of a counter-exampleI gave you three upthread. I can give you a dozen more at the drop of a hat if you want them, but here's one 25-year-old gem to be going on with.
#define M 002354l
#define A 000644l
#define G 000132l
#define I 000322l
#define C 000374l
#define a ;
#define b for
#define c ++
#define d %
#define e int
#define f ,
#define g -
#define h 011
#define i =
#define j {
#define k )
#define l '\n'
#define m main
#define n <
#define o }
#define p >
#define q &&
#define r (
#define s ||
#define t ?
#define u putchar
#define v void
#define w '*'
#define x :
#define y ' '
#define _ /
#define C_O_O_L return
e u r e k a
e
m r
v k j
j j j j
j j j j j
j j j j j j
j j j j j j j
j e z a b r z i
M _ A _ G _ I _ C
a z n G a u r z d h
+ z _ h p M _ A q z d
h + z _ h n M _ G q z _
h n z d h + M _ I q z _ h
p z d h g M _ C t w x y k f
z d h g h + 1 s u r l k f z c
k a u r l k a j j j j j j j j j
j j C_O_O_L M _ A _ G _ I _ C a o
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
I don't trust you not to cheat, of course, but I invite anyone else to feed this code to the OP's decision program and report on the result.
sufficiently proves that youThe exact meaning of your specific claim is of no consequence
have no basis for *the exact meaning of my specific claim*
unless it's attempting to overturn Turing's `On Computable Numbers'. If that's what you're trying to do, then you've certainly got guts because you're trying to square the circle.--
If that's /not/ what you're trying to do, then you need to work on your communication skills.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.