Newsportal USENET - Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Semantic Property of Finite String

Sujet : Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Semantic Property of Finite String
De : dbush.mobile (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dbush)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 13. Mar 2025, 21:48:37

Autres entêtes

Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vqvgb4$3kfru$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/13/2025 4:46 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/13/2025 4:27 AM, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:41:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 3/12/2025 7:56 PM, dbush wrote:
On 3/12/2025 8:41 PM, olcott wrote:
>
NOT WHEN IT IS STIPULATED THAT THE BEHAVIOR BEING MEASURED IS
>
The direct execution of DDD
>
is proven to be different than the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH
according to the semantics of the x86 language.
>
Which is weird, considering that a simulator should produce the same
behaviour.
>
>
DECIDERS ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT ON THE SEMANTIC OR SYNTACTIC PROPERTY OF
THEIR INPUT FINITE STRINGS.
And not if the input called a different simulator that didn't abort.
>
Replacing the code of HHH with an unconditional simulator and subsequently running HHH(DD) cannot possibly
reach its own final state no matter what HHH
does.
Replacing the code of HHH1 with an unconditional simulator and subsequently running HHH1(DD) does reach its
own final state.
If someone was not a liar they would say that
these are different computations.

Only because one changes the code that DD runs and one doesn't

Date	Sujet	#		Auteur
27 Apr 26	…

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal