Sujet : Re: DDD correctly emulated by EEE --- Correct Emulation Defined
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 22. Mar 2025, 19:00:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrmtrn$cvat$7@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/22/2025 12:34 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/22/25 10:52 AM, olcott wrote:
_DD()
[00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call EEE(DD)
[00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d pop ebp
[00002155] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>
When finite integer N instructions of the above x86
machine language DD are emulated by each x86 emulator
EEE[N] at machine address [000015c3] according to the
semantics of the x86 language no DD ever reaches its own
"ret" instruction at machine address [00002155] and
terminates normally.
>
Your can't emulate the above code for N > 4, as you get into undefine memory.
I have already addressed this objection dozens of times.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer